Effektivität digitaler Pflegeanwendungen bei Pflegebedürftigen im häuslichen Umfeld
Ein systematisches Review
Abstract
Zusammenfassung:Hintergrund: Die steigende Zahl Pflegebedürftiger stellt Gesundheitssysteme zunehmend vor Herausforderungen. Im Juni 2021 wurden digitale Pflegeanwendungen (DiPA) in den Leistungskatalog der gesetzlichen Pflegekassen in Deutschland aufgenommen. Diese sollen einer Verschlimmerung der Pflegebedürftigkeit entgegenwirken und/oder die Selbstständigkeit Pflegebedürftiger im häuslichen Umfeld unterstützen. Ziel: Ziel war es, national und international verfügbare Evidenz zur Effektivität von DiPA, entsprechend der Definition des Bundesinstituts für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), systematisch zu erfassen und aufzubereiten. Methode: Die Übersichtsarbeit wurde nach dem PRISMA-Statement mittels systematischer Recherchen in den Datenbanken Medline und Cinahl durchgeführt und durch eine umfassende Handsuche ergänzt (08/2022). Die Studienqualität wurde mit dem Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2) bewertet. Die Ergebnissynthese erfolgte narrativ. Ergebnisse: Es wurden acht randomisierte kontrollierte Studien eingeschlossen. Studienergebnisse zeigten Verbesserungen der Kognition, der Aktivitäten des täglichen Lebens und der Mobilität Pflegebedürftiger. Die Studienqualität ist aufgrund vorwiegend unverblindeter Studiendesigns und kleinen Fallzahlen niedrig bis moderat. Schlussfolgerungen: Die aktuell verfügbare Evidenz bietet weder den Herstellenden von DiPA noch den zuständigen Akteur_innen im Gesundheitswesen eine belastbare Grundlage zur Bewertung des Nutzens von DiPA. Weiterer Forschungsbedarf zur Effektivität von DiPA besteht. Insbesondere sind qualitativ hochwertige Studien notwendig, um das Potenzial von DiPA für den deutschen Pflegesektor abschätzen zu können.
Abstract:Background: The growing need for long-term care poses challenges for healthcare systems. In June 2021, digital care applications (DiPA) were introduced as a new service in the statutory long-term care insurance in Germany. Their aim is to counteract the increased care need and/or support independence in the home. Aim: This project systematically identified and reported on national and international evidence on DiPA effectiveness, as described by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). Methods: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement by means of systematic searches in the databases Medline and Cinahl, and supplemented by an extensive manual search (08/2022). Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). The results were synthesized narratively. Results: Eight randomized controlled studies were included; improvements in cognition, activities of daily living, and mobility in home care patients, were reported. Study quality was low to moderate, due to mostly unblinded study designs and low case numbers. Conclusions: The currently available evidence fails to provide a reliable basis for assessing the benefits of DiPA, to neither DiPA manufacturers, nor to responsible parties in the healthcare system. Further research on DiPA effectiveness, particularly with high-quality studies, are necessary to assess its potential in the German care sector.
Literatur
2019). Disease severity and minimal clinically important differences in clinical outcome assessments for Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. Alzheimer’s & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 5, 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.06.005
(2017). Tailored and Adaptive Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults at Risk for Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease, 60(3), 889–911. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170404
(2009). Computer-based cognitive training for mild cognitive impairment: results from a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders, 23(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819c6137
(2022). Attrition Within Digital Health Interventions for People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 24(2), e27735. https://doi.org/10.2196/27735
(Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM) (Hrsg) (2022). Das Verfahren für digitale Pflegeanwendungen (DiPA) nach § 78a SGB XI: Ein Leitfaden für Hersteller und Nutzende. https://www.bfarm.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Medizinprodukte/DiPA_Leitfaden.pdf?__blob=publicationFile2014). Effectiveness of eHealth interventions and information needs in palliative care: a systematic literature review. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(3), e72. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2812
(2015). Effectiveness of complex interventions focused on quality-of-life assessment to improve palliative care patients’ outcomes: a systematic review. Palliative medicine, 29(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314539718
(2019).
(Analysing data and undertaking metaanalyses . In J. P. HigginsJ. ThomasJ. ChandlerM. CumpstonT. LiM. J. PageV. A. Welch (Hrsg.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (S. 241–284). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch10Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pflegewissenschaft eV (Hrsg) (2020). S1 Leitlinie – Häusliche Versorgung, soziale Teilhabe und Lebensqualität bei Menschen mit Pflegebedürftigkeit im Kontext ambulanter Pflege unter den Bedingungen der COVID-19-Pandemie – AWMF Registernummer 184–002, Leitlinienreport. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/184-002LGm_S1_Haeusliche-Versorgung-soziale-Teilhabe-Lebensqualitaet-bei-Menschen-mit-Pflegebedarf-COVID19-Pandemie_2021-04_1-abgelaufen.pdf2004). Defining patient-reported outcomes. Value in health: The journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 7 Suppl 1, S 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.7s102.x
(2005). The law of attrition. Journal of medical Internet research, 7(1), e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11
(2011). CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. Journal of medical Internet research, 13(4), e126. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1923
(2011). Computerised Cognitive Training for Older Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Study Using a Randomised Controlled Trial Design. Brain Impairment, 12(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.12.3.187
(2014). Empirical studies on the effectiveness of assistive technology in the care of people with dementia: a systematic review. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 8(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-09-2012-0021
(GKV-Spitzenverband (2019). Schriftenreihe Modellprogramm zur Weiterentwicklung der Pflegeversicherung: Band 15. Digitalisierung und Pflegebedürftigkeit – Nutzen und Potenziale von Assistenztechnologien. CW Haarfeld GmbH.2017). A Systematic Review of Reviews Evaluating Technology-Enabled Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 11(5), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817713506
(2022). Effect of an eHealth intervention on older adults’ quality of life and health-related outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of general internal medicine, 37(3), 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06888-1
(2015). Evaluating an Online Cognitive Training Platform for Older Adults: User Experience and Implementation Requirements. Journal of gerontological nursing, 41(8), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20150710-44
(2011). The Link between Cognitive Measures and ADLs and IADL Functioning in Mild Alzheimer’s: What Has Gender Got to Do with It? International journal of Alzheimer’s disease, 2011, 276734. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/276734
(2018). The impact of digital health interventions on health-related outcomes in the workplace: A systematic review. Digital health, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618770861
(2015). Cognitive Training Program to Improve Working Memory in Older Adults with MCI. Clinical gerontologist, 39(5), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2015.1120257
(2020). Pflege-Report 2019. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58935-9
(2011). Telerehabilitation in stroke care-a systematic review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2010.100105
(1983). Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 31(12), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x
(2023). Digitale Gesundheitsinterventionen entwickeln, evaluieren und implementieren (Teil I) – Diskussionspapier der Arbeitsgruppe Digital Health des Deutschen Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung (DNVF). Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany), 85(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1933-2779
(2016). Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: A systematic literature review. International journal of medical informatics, 85(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014
(2019). Digital technology and nursing care: a scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies. BMC health services research, 19(1), 400. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4238-3
(2020). Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review. BMC health services research, 20(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05106-8
(2020). Telerehabilitation services for stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 1(1), CD010255. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3
(2020). Home Monitoring in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. A Randomized Controlled Trial. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 202(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202002-0328OC
(2020). A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. European journal of epidemiology, 35(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5
(2021). Effectiveness of using assistive technology for time orientation and memory, in older adults with or without dementia. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 16(5), 472–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1650299
(2019). Acceptance of Mobile Health Applications: Examining Key Determinants and Moderators. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02791
(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
(2020). Efficacy of a Web App for Cognitive Training (MeMo) Regarding Cognitive and Behavioral Performance in People With Neurocognitive Disorders: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(3), e17167. https://doi.org/10.2196/17167
(2012). Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of internal medicine, 157(6), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537
(Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (Hrsg) (2012). Methodology Checklist 2: Randomised Controlled Trials – Notes for completion of checklist. https://www.sign.ac.uk/what-we-do/methodology/checklists/2013). The importance of statistical power. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 347(oct18 2), f
(6282 –f6282 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6282Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis) (Hrsg) (2020). Pflegebedürftige (Anzahl und Quote). https://www.gbe-bund.de/gbe/pkg_isgbe5.prc_menu_olap?p_uid=gast&p_aid=89953936&p_sprache=D&p_help=0&p_indnr=510&p_indsp=138&p_ityp=H&p_fid=2019). RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 366, l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
(2020). Home-based Upper Extremity Stroke Therapy Using a Multiuser Virtual Reality Environment: A Randomized Trial. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 101(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.182
(2020). Mapping the Evidence on the Effectiveness of Telemedicine Interventions in Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Hypertension: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(3), e16791. https://doi.org/10.2196/16791
(2015). Online cognitive training in healthy older adults: a preliminary study on the effects of single versus multi-domain training. Translational Neuroscience, 6(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2015-0003
(2022). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Glycemic Management among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074173
(