Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Ziel dieser Studie war die Überprüfung des Einflusses der Effektivität von Bewältigungsverhalten (perfekt, ausgewogen, ungünstig) und der Art der sozialen Beziehung (Freundin, Bekannte) auf die Bereitschaft zu sozialer Unterstützung im Umgang mit einer alltagsnahen, leistungsbezogenen Stresssituation (Vorbereitung auf eine Prüfung). In einem experimentellen Design wurden N = 132 Teilnehmerinnen schriftlich fiktive Szenarien, in denen das Zielverhalten beschrieben war, vorgegeben und ihre Unterstützungsbereitschaft sowie ihre emotionalen Reaktionen Ärger und Mitleid erfasst. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass unabhängig von der Art der sozialen Beziehung Zielpersonen mit einem ausgewogenen und ungünstigen Bewältigungsverhalten eine höhere Bereitschaft zu sozialer Unterstützung auslösten als die Zielperson mit perfektem Bewältigungsverhalten. Die Zielperson mit ungünstiger Bewältigung löste am meisten und die Zielperson mit perfekter Bewältigung am wenigsten Mitleid aus. Mitleid erwies sich neben Ärger als stärkster Prädiktor zur Vorhersage der Unterstützungsbereitschaft.
Abstract. The aim of this study was to examine whether the effectiveness of coping behavior (perfect, balanced, poor) and the type of relationship between provider and recipient (friend, acquaintance) influenced the willingness to provide social support in coping with an achievement-related stressful situation (preparing for an exam). Based on an experimental design, N = 132 women were presented with vignettes depicting the target behavior as part of a fictitious scenario and were asked to rate their willingness to provide social support and their emotional reactions (anger, sympathy). Results showed that independent of the relationship between provider and recipient participants reported more willingness to provide social support when the coping behavior was balanced or poor, relative to the perfect coping behavior. The poorly coping target elicited the highest sympathy. Sympathy was found to be the strongest predictor for willingness to provide social support besides anger.
Literatur
(2005). Der Einfluss von Coping-Normen auf das Bewältigungsverhalten [Abstract]. In A. Helmes (Hrsg.), Lebensstiländerungen in Prävention Rehabilitation (S. 153). Lengerich: Pabst.
(1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer.
(2001). Weaving social support and relationships together. In B. R. Sarason & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Implications for clinical and community psychology (pp. 1-14). Chichester: Wiley & Son.
(1986). The mediator-moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173– 1182
(1991). Encouraging words concerning the evidence for altruism. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 159– 168
(1994). Effects of good versus bad mood and optimistic versus pessimistic outlook on social acceptance versus rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 138– 151
(1992). Elements of supportive interactions: When are attempts to help effective?. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp. 83-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1987). Correlates of social support receipt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 71– 80
(1990). Determinants of social support provision in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 437– 450
(2003). Whom would you rather help: An acquaintance mot responsible for her plight or a responsible sibling?. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 331– 340
(2003). Social support and quality of life. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 12, 25– 31
(2002). The stigma of being pessimistically biased. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 92– 107
(2002). Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen mit SVF 120 und SVF 78. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, instruments & computers, 36, 717– 731
(1995). On the advantages of modesty: The benefits of a balanced self- presentation. Communication Research, 22, 575– 591
(2006). Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Personal Relationships, 13, 207– 229
(1985). Effect of depression level and length of acquaintance on reaction of others to a request for help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1728– 1737
(2003). Soziale Unterstützung bei der Krankheitsbewältigung: Die Berliner Social Support Skalen (BSSS). Diagnostica, 49, 73– 82
(1992). Expectancies as mediators between recipient characteristics and social support intentions. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 65-87). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
(1990). Die Wirkung von Kontrollierbarkeit und Bewältigungsverhalten auf Emotionen und soziale Unterstützung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 21, 118– 125
(1990). The role of coping in support provision: The self-presentational dilemma of victims of life crises. In I. G. Sarason, B. R. Sarason & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 397-426). New York: John Wiley.
(1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488– 531
(2007). Optimism and social support: The providers’ perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 205– 215
(2003). Breaking the rules: Personal and social responses to coping norm-violations. Anxiety, Stress and Coping: An International Journal, 16, 133– 153
(2004). Explorations in the social construction of anger. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 197– 219
(1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Berlin: Springer.
(1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford Press.
(2006). The role of perceived similarity in supportive responses to victims of negative life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1537– 1546
(2006). Direct and indirect strategies of mobilization as determinants of social support provided for cancer patients. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 248– 267
(1998). Reactions to crime victims: Effects of victims’ emotional state and type of relationship. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 209– 226