Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000025
Free first page

Literatur

  • Beilock, S. L. & Hohmann, T. (2010). „Embodied Cognition” – Ein Ansatz für die Sportpsychologie. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 17, 120–129. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • Cañal-Bruland, R. , van der Kamp, J. & van Kesteren, J. (2010). An examination of motor and perceptual contributions to recognizing deception in others’ actions. Human Movement Science, 29, 94– 102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Erlbaum. Google Scholar

  • Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849– 878. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Michaels, C.F. (2000). Information, perception, and action. What should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale, (1995)? Ecological Psychology, 12, 241– 258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129– 154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1986). Computational cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schütz-Bosbach, S. & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349– 355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Kamp, J. , Rivas, F , van Doorn, H. & Savelsbergh, G. (2008). Ventral and dorsal contributions in visual anticipation in fast ball sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 39, 100– 130. Google Scholar

  • Wöllner, C. & Cañal-Bruland, R. (2010). Keeping an eye on the violinist: motor experts show superior timing consistency in a visual perception task. Psychological Research, 74, 579–585. Google Scholar

  • Yang, S. , Gallo, D. & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Embodied memory judgments: A case of motor fluency. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 1359– 1365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar