Abstract
Es wurde wiederholt darauf hingewiesen, dass der Anlaufwinkel eines Elfmeterschützen das Abwehrverhalten eines Torhüters beeinflussen könnte. Eine experimentelle Überprüfung des Einflusses des Anlaufwinkels auf die Vorhersage der Schussrichtung aus Torhütersicht liegt allerdings noch nicht vor. In einem videobasierten Experiment haben wir den Anlaufwinkel links- und rechtsfüßiger Schützen auf sechs Stufen variiert (0° – 50°) und je 20 Torhüter, Feldspieler und Nicht-Fußballer gebeten, die Schussrichtung vorherzusagen. Torhüter und Feldspieler erreichten bessere Leistungen als Nicht-Fußballer. In den 20°- und 30° Bedingungen zeigten sich die besten und in den 0°- und 40°-Bedingungen die schlechtesten Antizipationsleistungen. Außerdem wurden linksfüßige Schüsse schlechter eingeschätzt als rechtsfüßige Schüsse. Weitere Analysen ergaben, dass mit zunehmendem Anlaufwinkel seltener Schüsse in die unteren Torecken erwartet wurden und die Zuversicht in die Richtigkeit der Vorhersagen abnahm. Insgesamt deuten unsere als vorläufig zu betrachtenden Befunde an, dass die Antizipationsleistung von Torhütern durch den Anlaufwinkel von Elfmeterschützen beeinflusst wird.
Previous reports suggest that a penalty taker’s approach angle may affect goalkeepers’ interceptive actions. However, experimental verification of the influence of approach angle on shot direction prediction from a goalkeepers’ perspective has not yet been provided. In a video-based experiment, we manipulated left- and right-footed penalty-takers’ approach angles under six conditions (0° – 50°) and we asked goalkeepers, field players, and non-soccer-players (20 participants per group) to predict the penalties’ shot direction. Goalkeepers and field players outperformed non-soccer-players. Anticipation performance, on average, was best under the 20° and 30° conditions and worst under the 0° and 40° conditions, and left-footed shots were harder to predict than right-footed shots. Further analyses showed that the observers’ tendency to make bottom corner predictions as well as the confidence in their predictions overall decreased with increasing approach angle. Collectively, our findings provide preliminary evidence to suggest that goalkeepers’ anticipation performance is influenced by a penalty taker’s approach angle.
Literatur
(2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109 – 1116.
(2009). Response bias in judging deceptive movements. Acta Psychologica, 130, 235 – 240.
(2010). An examination of motor and perceptual contributions to the recognition of deception from others’ actions. Human Movement Science, 29, 94 – 102.
(2001). Footedness in world soccer: An analysis of France ’98. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, 855 – 864.
et al.(2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69 – 74.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
(2000). Understanding and measuring coordination and control in kicking skills in soccer: Implications for talent identification and skill acquisition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18, 703 – 714.
(2012). Anticipation from biological motion: The goalkeeper problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 848 – 864.
(2010a). Availability of advance visual information constrains association-football goalkeeping performance during penalty kicks. Perception, 39, 1111 – 1124.
(2010b). Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 706 – 720.
(2010). Individual differences in the visual control of intercepting a penalty kick in association football. Human Movement Science, 29, 401 – 411.
(2011). Deception, individual differences and penalty kicks: Implications for goalkeeping in association football. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 6, 515 – 521.
(2007). Effects of experience on the coordination of internally and externally timed soccer kicks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 423 – 432.
(1997). Cues for goalkeepers. High-tech methods used to measure penalty shot response. Soccer Journal, May/June, 30 – 33.
(2009). The advantage of being left-handed in interactive sports. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1641 – 1648.
(1988). A biomechanical analysis of the instep kick motion in soccer. In T. Reilly, A. Lees, K. Davids & W. J. Murphy (Eds.), Science and Football (pp. 449 – 455). London: E & FN Spon.
(2004). Knee biomechanics of the support leg in soccer kicks from three angles of approach. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 1017 – 1028.
(2010). The biomechanics of kicking in soccer: A review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 805 – 817.
(2011). Early visual cues associated with a directional place kick in soccer. Sports Biomechanics, 10, 125 – 134.
(2012). Side bias in human performance: A review on the left-handers’ advantage in sports. In T. Dutta, M. Mandal & S. Kumar (Eds.), Bias in Human Behaviour (pp. 163 – 182). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
(2014a). On-court position influences skilled tennis players’ anticipation of shot outcome. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36, 14 – 26.
(2014b). Skill differences in visual anticipation of type of throw in team-handball penalties. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 260 – 267.
(2012). On the advantage of being left-handed in volleyball: Further evidence of the specificity of skilled visual perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 446 – 453.
(2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 457 – 478.
(1996). Anticipation of professional soccer goalkeepers when facing right- and left-footed penalty kicks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 931 – 934.
(1993). Anticipation of soccer goalkeepers facing penalty kicks. In T. Reilly, J. Clarys & A. Stibbe (Eds.), Science and football II (pp. 250 – 253). London: E & FN Spon.
(2013). Dueling in the penalty box: Evidence-based recommendations on how shooters and goalkeepers can win penalty shootouts in soccer. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 209 – 229.
(2012). Expert anticipatory skill in striking sports: A review and a model. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 175 – 187.
(1987). Zur Antizipation des Elfmetertorschusses aus der Sicht des Torwarts. Leistungssport, 17, 23 – 32.
(1992). Seitigkeitstypologie im Leistungssport. Leistungssport, 22, 35 – 40.
(2003). Professionals play minimax. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 395 – 415.
(2005). Anticipation and visual search behaviour in expert soccer goalkeepers. Ergonomics, 48, 1686 – 1697.
(2010). Saving penalties, scoring penalties. In I. Renshaw, K. Davids & G. J. P. Savelsbergh (Eds.), Motor learning in practice: A constraints-led approach (pp. 57 – 68). London: Taylor & Francis, Routledge.
(2002). Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 279 – 287.
(2012). Human handedness in interactive situations: Negative perceptual frequency effects can be reversed! Journal of Sports Sciences, 30, 507 – 513.
(2009). The effects of approach angle on penalty kicking accuracy and kick kinematics with recreational soccer players. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 230 – 234.
(2012). The role of movement exaggeration in the anticipation of deceptive soccer penalty kicks. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 539 – 555.
(1996). Anticipation and confidence of decisions related to skilled performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 293 – 307.
(2013). Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 2765 – 2778.
(1993). Advance cue utilization in soccer. In T. Reilly, J. Clarys & A. Stibbe (Eds.), Science and football II (pp. 239 – 243). London: E & FN Spon.
(2002). A kinematic analysis of the prevalence of pre-impact cues in the football penalty kick. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 74 – 74.
(2009). Inside the brain of an elite athlete: The neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 585 – 596.