Multinomial Processing Tree Models for Discrete Choice
Abstract
This paper shows how to develop new multinomial processing tree (MPT) models for discrete choice, and in particular binary choice. First it reviews the history of discrete choice with special attention to Duncan Luce’s book Individual Choice Behavior. Luce’s choice axiom leads to the Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) paired-comparison model which is the basis of logit models of discrete choice used throughout the social and behavioral sciences. It is shown that a reparameterization of the BTL model is represented by choice probabilities generated from a finite state Markov chain, and this representation is closely related to the rooted tree structure of MPT models. New MPT models of binary choice can be obtained by placing restrictions on this representation of the BTL model. Several of these new MPT models for paired comparisons are described, compared to the BTL model, and applied to data from a replicated round-robin data structure.
References
1979). The statistical treatment of a Thurstonian model for rating chess players. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 39–60.
(1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57–86.
(2007). Using multinomial processing tree models to measure cognitive deficits in clinical populations. In , Advances in clinical cognitive science: Formal modeling of processes and symptoms (pp. 19–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
(1959). Choice point behavior. In , Studies in mathematical learning theory (pp. 109–124). Stanford: Stanford University Press (chap. 6).
(1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs, I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324–345.
(1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459.
(1995). A measurement-theoretic analysis of the fuzzy logic model of perception. Psychological Review, 102, 396–408.
(2000). Accuracy, scope, and flexibility of models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 3–19.
(1988). The method of paired comparisons (2nd ed.). London: Griffin.
(1976). A bibliography on the method of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 32, 241–252.
(1978). The rating of chess players: Past and present. New York: Arco.
(2000). Statistical distributions (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
(2001). Multivariate statistical modeling based on general linear models (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
(1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
(1966). An empirical evaluation and comparison of two models for discriminatory scales. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 174–183.
(1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21–47.
(1999). GPT.EXE: A powerful tool for the visualization and analysis of general processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 220–234.
(2004). Representing parametric order constraints in multi-trial applications of multinomial processing tree models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215–229.
(1997). The art of computer programming, Volume 1: Fundamental algorithms. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
(1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
(1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In , Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. III, pp. 249–410). New York: Wiley.
(1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). Bayes factor of model selection validates FLMP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 1–17.
(2000). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, [Special issue on Model Selection].
(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
(2003). Flexibility versus generalizability in model selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 29–44.
(in press ). A context-free language for binary multinomial processing tree models.1961). Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley.
(2007). Probability models (9th ed.). San Diego: Elsevier.
(2006). Multinomial processing tree models in social psychology [
(Multinomiale verarbeitungsbaummodelle in der sozial psychologie ]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 161–171.1963). Basic measurement theory. In , Handbook of mathematical psychology I (pp. 1–102). New York: Wiley.
(1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.
(1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281–299.
(1979). Preference trees. Psychological Review, 86, 542–573.
(