Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.18.2.80

The study described here is part of an evaluation of a pilot project concerning the implementation of three psychiatric crisis units in general hospitals in Belgium. The purpose was to evaluate the short-term outcome of a multidisciplinary crisis intervention for psychiatric patients referred to the emergency department. Patients were assessed with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) at the time of referral to the emergency department and again 1 month later. Patients referred for a psychiatric crisis intervention were compared with patients receiving short-term psychiatric inpatient treatment in another hospital. Patients referred to the emergency department showed a considerable degree of psychiatric disturbance. The General Health Questionnaire appeared to be a good measure for assessment of the “state” aspect of a psychiatric disturbance. The state of distress was significantly reduced one month after referral in both treatment conditions. Nevertheless, an important proportion of patients remained in a state of considerable distress. The results indicate that a short hospital-based crisis intervention approach is comparable with more traditional acute inpatient treatment. However, in the case of more severely distressed patients it may be insufficient. Several limitations of this study are also discussed (risk of overestimation of improvement, influence of time or pre-existing differences).

References

  • Atha, C, Salkovskis, PM, Storer, DCognitive-behavioral problem solving in the treatment of patients attending a medical emergency department: A controlled trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, (1992). 36, 299–307 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bassuk, E, Gerson, SChronic crisis patients: A discrete clinical group. American Journal of Psychiatry, (1980). 137, 1513–1517 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bellack, LHandbook of intensive brief and emergency psychotherapy (B.E.P.) (2nd rev. ed.). C.P.S. Inc. (1992). Google Scholar

  • Brinkman, F, Van, den Berg RCrisishulpverlening. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum (1992). Google Scholar

  • Cremniter, D, Payant, C, Jamain, S, Thenault, M, Meidinger, A, Marsanne, S, Delmas, C, Zervis, C, Fermanian, JEvaluation of a sample of 457 psychiatric emergencies 2 years after the emergency room consultation. In JB Van Luyn, CATh Rijnders, HHP Vergouwen, A Wunderink (Eds), Emergency psychiatry today (pp. 45-48). Elsevier (1992). Google Scholar

  • De, Clercq M, Goffinet, S, Hoyois, Ph, Brusselmans, M, Andreoli, AProspective research: Assessment after 2 years of the outcome of 109 psychiatric emergencies treated according to the model of crisis intervention. In JB Van Luyn, CATh Rijnders, HHP Vergouwen, A Wunderink (Eds), Emergency psychiatry today (pp 39-45). Elsevier (1992). Google Scholar

  • Fisher, JA problem type classification for psychiatric emergencies. Comprehensive Psychiatry, (1979). 20, 270–274 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, DThe detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London, Oxford University Press (Maudsly Monograph No. 21) (1972). Google Scholar

  • Howard,, KA phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, (1993). 61, 678–685 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Koeter, MWJ, Ormel, J, van, den Brink W, Dijkstra, W, Schoenmaker, J, Staal, JDe waarde van de GHQ als toestandsmaat. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, (1987). 29, 667–679 Google Scholar

  • Koeter, MWJ, Ormel, JGeneral Health Questionnaire. Nederlandse bewerking. Handleiding. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger B.V. (1991). Google Scholar

  • McDowell, I, Newell, CMeasuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press (1987). Google Scholar

  • Mirin, SM, Namerow, MJWhy study treatment outcome?. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, (1991). 42, 1007–1013 MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ormel, J, Koeter, MWJ, vanden, Brink W, Giel, RMeasuring change with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). The problem of retest effects. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, (1989). 24, 227–232 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rosset, N, Andreoli, ACrisis intervention and affective disorders: a comparative cost-effectiveness study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, (1995). 30, 231–235 MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rund, DA, Hutzler, JCEmergency psychiatry. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co. (1983). Google Scholar

  • Slaby, AE, Perry, PLUse and abuse of psychiatric emergency services. International Journal of Psychiatry and Medicine, (1980-81). 10, 1–8 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Spooren, D, Jannes, C, Henderick, H, van, Heeringen CEpidemiology of psychiatric emergency referrals in Belgium. Crisis, (1996). 17, 15–21 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • Zdanowicz, N, Janne, P, Gillet, JB, Reynaert, C, Vause, MOveruse of emergency care in psychiatry. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, (1996). 3, 48–51 Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar