Preventing Suicide in Prisons, Part II
International Comparisons of Suicide Prevention Services in Correctional Facilities
Abstract
Abstract. The International Association for Suicide Prevention created a Task Force on Suicide in Prisons to better disseminate the information in this domain. One of its objectives was to summarize suicide-prevention activities in the prison systems. This study of the Task Force uncovered many differences between countries, although mental health professionals remain central in all suicide prevention activities. Inmate peer-support and correctional officers also play critical roles in suicide prevention but there is great variation in the involvement of outside community workers. These differences could be explained by the availability of resources, by the structure of the correctional and community services, but mainly by the different paradigms about suicide prevention. While there is a common and traditional paradigm that suicide prevention services are mainly offered to individuals by mental health services, correctional systems differ in the way they include (or not) other partners of suicide prevention: correctional officers, other employees, peer inmates, chaplains/priests, and community workers. Circumstances, history, and national cultures may explain such diversity but they might also depend on the basic way we think about suicide prevention at both individual and environmental levels.
References
(1992). Adjusting to prison life. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 275-359). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
(1988). Current views on inmate visiting. Proceedings of the First National Conference on the Family and Corrections, Sacramento. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from www.ifs.univie.ac.at/uncjin/mosaic/famcorr/fmcorcon3.html
(1999). Suicides in detentie. [Suicides in prison]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Elsevier
(2005). Demographic, criminal, and psychiatric factors related to inmate suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35, 63–75
(2001). Identifying suicide risk in penal institutions in The Netherlands. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 3, 22–28
(1998). Evaluation of VIVA (Voluntary Investing in a Viable Affective Life). Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada
(2001). Nonfatal self-harm in Western Australian prisons: Who, where, when, and why. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 34, 47–66
(2002). Jailhouse Blues revisited. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37, 68–73
(2002). Die letzte psychiatrische Anstalt. [The last psychiatric hospital] Recht & Psychiatrie, 20, 162–167
(2005). Suicide in prison. Lancet, 366, 1242–1244
(2004). Suicide in custody: A case-control study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 494–498
(2004). Piekeren in detentie. [Worrying in prison] Sancties, 6, 334–340
(2007). Preventing suicide in prisons, Part I. Recommendations from the International Association for Suicide Prevention Task Force on suicide in prisons. Crisis, 28, 113–121
(2006). The role of the prison environment 15. in prison suicide and prisoner distress. In G.E. Dear (Ed.), Preventing suicide and other self-harm in prison (pp. 16-28). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan
(2006). Improving staff-prisoner relations. In G.E. Dear (Ed.), Preventing suicide and other self-harm in prison (pp. 103-117). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan
(2005). Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: Comparison on data on service provision from six European countries. British Medical Journal, 330, 123–126
(2003). The Styal Report: The death in custody of a woman and the series of deaths in HMP/YOI Styal August 2002-August 2003. London, UK: Author
(1997). Befriending in prisons. Crisis, 18, 148–151
(2006). The role of peer-support in reducing self-harm in prison. In G.E. Dear (Ed.), Preventing suicide and other self-harm in prison (pp. 153-166). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan
(2005). World prison population list (sixth ed.). London, UK: International Centre for Prison Studies of the King's College