Analyzing Language in Suicide Notes and Legacy Tokens
Investigating Clues to Harm of Self and Harm to Others in Writing
Abstract
Abstract.Background: Identifying precursors that will aid in the discovery of individuals who may harm themselves or others has long been a focus of scholarly research. Aim: This work set out to determine if it is possible to use the legacy tokens of active shooters and notes left from individuals who completed suicide to uncover signals that foreshadow their behavior. Method: A total of 25 suicide notes and 21 legacy tokens were compared with a sample of over 20,000 student writings for a preliminary computer-assisted text analysis to determine what differences can be coded with existing computer software to better identify students who may commit self-harm or harm to others. Results: The results support that text analysis techniques with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) tool are effective for identifying suicidal or homicidal writings as distinct from each other and from a variety of student writings in an automated fashion. Conclusion: Findings indicate support for automated identification of writings that were associated with harm to self, harm to others, and various other student writing products. This work begins to uncover the viability or larger scale, low cost methods of automatic detection for individuals suffering from harmful ideation.
References
2010). Threat assessment teams: Workplace and school violence prevention. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 79(2), 15.
(2012).
(Seeing through deception: A computational approach to deceit detection in written communication . In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Deception Detection (pp. 15–22). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.1993). Comparing genuine and simulated suicide notes: A new perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 699–702.
(1999). The varieties of homicide and its research. Proceedings of the 1999 Meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group. Quantico, VA: FBI Academy, FBI, US Department of Justice.
. (2013). United States active shooter events from 2000 to 2010: Training and equipment implications. San Marcos, TX: Texas State University.
(2015). Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000029
(2013). Text analysis for detecting terrorism-related articles on the web. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 38, 16–21.
(2014). Re-thinking typologies of multiple murders: The missing category of serial-mass murder and its theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 16, 122–126.
(2008). Serial murder, multi-disciplinary perspectives for investigators. Behavioral analysis unit for violent crime. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/serial-murder
. (2014). Mass shootings in America. Moving beyond Newtown. Homicide Studies, 18(1), 125–145.
(1998). Multiple homicide: Patterns of serial and mass murder. Crime and Justice, 23, 407–455.
(2007). Extreme killing: Understanding serial and mass murder. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
(2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37, 3–19.
(2007). The content of suicide notes from attempters and completers. Crisis, 28, 102–104.
(2013). Hungry like the wolf: A word-pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 102–114.
(2014). Shooting for accuracy: Comparing data sources on mass murder. Homicide Studies, 18(1), 105–124.
(2009a). Rampage school shooters: A typology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 79–86.
(2009b). Why kids kill: Inside the minds of school shooters. London, UK: Macmillan.
(2010). Expanding the sample: Five school shooters. Retrieved from http://www.schoolshooters.info
(2013). Psychiatric medications and school shooters. Retrieved from http://www.schoolshooters.info
(2007).
(Suicide and culture . In D. LesterJ. R. Rogers, Suicide: A global issue (pp. 209–232). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.2009). Learning about suicide from the diary of Cesare Pavese. Crisis, 30, 222–224.
(2014). College student stressors, depression, and suicidal ideation. Psychological Reports, 114, 293–296.
(2010). Content differences in suicide notes by sex, age, and method: A study of Australian suicide notes. Psychological Reports, 106, 475–476.
(2007).
(Using computational text analysis tools to compare the lyrics of suicidal and non-suicidal songwriters . In D. S. McNamaraG. TraftonEds.. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.2005). Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. JAMA, 16, 2064–2074.
(1999). The classroom avenger: A behavioral profile of school based shootings. The Forensic Examiner, 8, 16–18.
(2013). International handbook of threat assessment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
. (2005). Serial murder: Multi-disciplinary perspectives for investigators. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
(2013). Screening and assessment for suicide prevention: Tools and procedures for risk identification among juvenile justice youth. Washington, DC: National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention.
. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675.
(1966).
(Some characteristics of genuine versus simulated suicide notes . In P. StoneD. DunphyM. SmithD. OgilvieEds.. The General Inquirer: A computer approach to content analysis (pp. 527–535). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.1959). Motivation and language behavior: A content analysis of suicide notes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 58–67.
(2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: Critical Incident Response Group, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy.
(2010). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: Federal Bureau of Investigations.
(2007). Current issues and new directions in Psychology and Health: Listening to what people say – the value of narrative and computational linguistics in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 22, 631–635.
(2011). Using computer analyses to identify language style and aggressive intent: The secret life of function words. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4(2), 92–102.
(2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2001) [Software]. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
(1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 601–626.
(2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
(2003). Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 291.
(2010). Suicide note classification using natural language processing: A content analysis. Biomedical Informatics Insights, 3, 19–28.
(1999). Sources of stress among college students. College Student Journal, 33, 312–318.
(2013). The assessment of anonymous threatening communications. International Handbook of Threat Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2001). Word use in the poetry of suicidal and nonsuicidal poets. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 517–522.
(1963).
(A computer approach to content analysis: Studies using the General Inquirer System . In Proceedings of the May 21-23, 1963, Spring Joint Computer Conference (pp. 241–256). New York, NY: ACM.1956). Clues to suicide. Public Health Reports, 71, 109–114.
(1957). Clues to suicide. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54.
(2000). Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 3–56.
(