Development and Validation of the Gatekeeper Behavior Scale
A Tool to Assess Gatekeeper Training for Suicide Prevention
Abstract
Abstract.Background: Community-based gatekeeper trainings are effective tools in increasing gatekeeper skills but few validated measures assess impact. Aims: This study aimed at determining the validity of an 11-item Gatekeeper Behavior Scale (GBS) to assess gatekeeper skills that predict behavior. Method: To validate the scale, 8,931 users were administered GBS surveys at pretraining, posttraining, and follow-up periods. The training was one of five from the suite of online At-Risk mental health learning simulations for university faculty/staff or students or high/middle school educators. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis revealed the three-factor model based on the subscales of preparedness, likelihood, and self-efficacy fit the data best. Factor loadings showed all items correlated highly with theoretical constructs (r ≥ .84, p < .001). The GBS had high internal consistency (α = 0.93). Criterion-related validity for likelihood to discuss concerns at posttraining was significantly related to approaching students believed to be in psychological distress (r = .219, p < .001). Likelihood to refer significantly correlated with the number of students referred (r = .235, p < .001). Convergent validity was established via a correlation between self-efficacy in motivating someone to seek help and general self-efficacy (r = .519, p < .001). Conclusion: The GBS appears to be a valid tool in measuring the impact of online gatekeeper training simulations and holds promise for assessing other delivery methods.
References
2009). Confirmatory factor analysis using Amos, LISREL, Mplus, SAS/STAT CALIS (UITS Working paper). Indiana University, Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~statmath/stat/all/cfa/index.html
(2011). Using an avatar-based simulation to train families to motivate veterans with post-traumatic stress to seek help at the VA. Games for Health, 1(1), 21–28. 10.1089/g4h.2011.0003
(2004). An outcome evaluation of the SOS suicide prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 446–451.
(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
(2009). School-based suicide prevention: Research advances and practice implications. School Psychology Review, 38(2), 233
(2015). Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: A theoretical model and review of the empirical literature. Santa Monica, CA: Rand National Defense Research Institute.
(2010). Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
. (2001). Suicide prevention in Aboriginal communities: Application of community gatekeeper training. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(4), 315–321.
(2007). Control-group study of an intervention training program for youth suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37, 135–144.
(2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.
(2011). Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among adults aged ≥18 years – United States, 2008–2009. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (no. SS-13). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6013a1.htm
(2007). Proximate outcomes of gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in the workplace. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 37(6), 659–670. 10.1521/suli.2007.37.6.659
(2011). Does practice make perfect? A randomized control trial of behavioral rehearsal on suicide prevention gatekeeper skills. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 32(3), 195–211. 10.1007/s10935-011-0250-z
(2010). Standardization in psychological research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 88–96.
(1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2001). Youth suicide prevention. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 31(Suppl), 6–31. 10.1521/suli.31.1.5.6.2421
(1994). Prevention of suicide: Aspirations and evidence. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 308(6938), 1227–1233.
(2009). Gatekeeper training as a preventative intervention for suicide: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 54(4), 260.
. (2012). Randomized trial of suicide gatekeeper training for social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(3), 270–281. 10.1177/1049731511436015
(1996). The use of simulations in an educational context: Broad and narrow foci. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 25, 123–133.
(1996). The use of simulations to assess the impact of an adolescent suicide response curriculum. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 26(4), 359–364.
(1996). Great ideas revisited. Techniques for evaluating training programs. Revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Training and Development, 50(1), 54–59.
(2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
(2013). The impact of universal suicide-prevention programs on the help-seeking attitudes and behaviors of youths. Crisis, 34(2), 82–97. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000178
(2003). Risk of suicide and related adverse outcomes after exposure to a suicide prevention program in the US Air Force: Cohort study. British Journal of Medicine, 327, 1376–1378.
(2015). Products. Retrieved from http://www.kognito.com/products/
. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. 10.1177/0146167292181001
(2005). Suicide prevention strategies: A systematic review. JAMA, 294(16), 2064–2074. 10.1001/jama.294.16.2064
(2008). Evaluation of gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in veterans. Archives of Suicide Research, 12(2), 148–154. 10.1080/13811110701857491
(2009). Suicide prevention programs in the schools: A review and public health perspective. School Psychology Review, 38(2), 168.
(2010). Mplus (Version 6) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(1997). The suicide intervention response inventory: A revision and validation. Death Studies, 21(1), 59–81. 10.1080/074811897202137
(2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
(2003). Many helping hearts: An evaluation of peer gatekeeper training in suicide risk assessment. Death Studies, 27(4), 321–333.
(2008). Randomized trial of a gatekeeper program for suicide prevention: 1-year impact on secondary school staff. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(1), 104–115. 10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.104
(2013). A systematic review process to evaluate suicide prevention programs: A sample case of community-based programs. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 35–51. 10.1002/jcop.21509
(