A Systematic Mapping of Suicide Bereavement and Postvention Research and a Proposed Strategic Research Agenda
Abstract
Abstract.Background: Suicide may have disruptive and/or devastating effects on family, friends, and the broader community. Of late, increased interest from suicide researchers has given rise to an upsurge in research productivity addressing suicide bereavement and postvention. At this critical juncture, the establishment of an agenda will help guide the direction of future scholarly research in this field. Aims: To conduct an exhaustive systematic mapping review and bibliometric analysis of peer-reviewed suicide bereavement and postvention research published over the past 50 years. Method: A comprehensive and strategic search of electronic databases and web-based search engines for original research studies was conducted resulting in the identification of 443 articles. Results: Since 1965, the global research activities in the field of suicide bereavement and postvention is approximately 8.86 papers per year. There remains a lack of evaluation studies on the effects of interventions/programs with the majority of papers being explanatory in nature. Several areas of study within this field remain neglected. Limitations: While the search strategy was rigorous, potential limitations exist due to nonstandardized nomenclature and English language only inclusion, which inherently favors research from high-income countries. Conclusion: Suggested topics for a research agenda are proposed from the current limitations in the field.
References
(2017). Current postvention research and priorities for the future: Results of a survey. Crisis, 38(3), 202–206. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000459
(2014). Suicide bereavement and postvention in major suicidology journals. Lessons learned for the future of postvention. Crisis, 35(5), 338–348. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000269
(2012). Essential questions on suicide bereavement and postvention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 24–32. 10.3390/ijerph9010024
(2015). Predictors of article impact in suicidology: The bereavement literature, A research note. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 45(1), 18–24.
(2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329–342.
(2014). The continuum of survivorship: Definitional issues in the aftermath of suicide. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 10.1111/sltb.12093
(2009). Systematic mapping guidance. London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
(2016). The World Bank Classification of Countries by Income (Policy Research Working Paper 7528). Retrieved from http://econ.worldbank.org
(2005). Connecting science to intervention: Advances, challenges, and the promise of evidence-based practice. Social Work Research, 29(3), 131–135.
(2013). Exposure to suicide and suicidality in Korea: Differential effects across men and women. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 59(3), 224–231. 10.1177/0020764012441296
(2014). Uncovering and identifying the missing voices in suicide bereavement. Suicidology Online, 5, 1–12.
(2017). Is exposure to suicide beyond kin associated with suicidal behavior? A review of the evidence. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(4), 461–474. 10.1111/sltb.12308
(2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1.
(2013). Institutional Review Boards: Challenges for suicide bereavement research. Crisis, 34(5), 297–304. 10.1027/0227-5910/a000191
(2008). Medical journals and authorship in low-income countries. Croatian Medical Journal, 49(5), 681–683. 10.3325/cmj.2008.5.681
(2014). Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk. The Lancet. 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70224-X
(2016).
Challenges to defining and classifying suicide and suicidal behaviors . In R. O'ConnorJ. PirkisEds., International handbook of suicide prevention: Research, policy and practice (2nd ed., pp. 11–35). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
