Skip to main content
Article

N170 – An Index of Categorical Face Perception?

An ERP Study of Human, Nonhuman Primate, and Dog Faces

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000057

The N170 ERP component is larger for human faces than objects and sensitive to their orientation and race. To learn how it reflects the processing of faces of different species, we recorded event-related potentials in response to upright or inverted unfamiliar faces of human beings, monkeys, and dogs of different races as well as objects. Upright and inverted faces were presented in a between-subject design and elicited a reliable N170. It decreased from human to monkey to dog faces, and inversion enhanced and delayed it for all categories. We suggest that the results favor categorical over prototypical processing.

References

  • Adolphs, R. (2008). Fear, faces, and the human amygdala. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 166–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amaral, D. G. , Price, J. L. , Pitkanen, A. , Carmichael, S. T. (1992). Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction (pp. 1–66). New York, NY: Wiley-Liss. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Assal, G. , Favre, C. , Anderes, J. P. (1984). Non-reconnaissance d’animaux familiers chez un paysan: Zooagnosie ou prosopagnosie pour les animaux [Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer. Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals]. Reviews in Neurology, 140, 580–584. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Batty, M. , Taylor, M. J. (2003). Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 613–620. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentin, S. , Allison, T. , Puce, A. , Perez, A. , McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–565. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blonder, L. X. , Smith, C. D. , Davis, C. E. , Kesler-West, M. L. , Garrity, T. F. , Avison, M. J. , Andersen, A. H. (2004). Regional brain response to faces of humans and dogs. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 384–394. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, B. , Sroka, H. , Munitz, H. (1969). Prosopagnosia with animal face agnosia. Cortex, 5, 164–169. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bruyer, R. , Laterre, C. , Seron, X. , Feyereisen, P. , Strypstein, E. , Pierrard, E. , Rectem, D. (1983). A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces. Brain and Cognition, 3, 257–284. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campanella, S. , Quinet, P. , Bruyer, R. , Crommelinck, M. , Guerit, J. M. (2002). Categorical perception of happiness and fear facial expressions: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 210–227. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, R. , Pascalis, O. , Coleman, M. , Wallace, S. B. , Benson, P. J. (1997). Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 264, 1429–1434. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carmel, D. , Bentin, S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition, 83, 1–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chao, L. L. , Haxby, J. V. , Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913–919. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chao, L. L. , Martin, A. , Haxby, J. V. (1999). Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces? Neuroreport, 10, 2945–2950. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cunningham, W. A. , Johnson, M. K. , Raye, C. L. , Chris Gatenby, J. , Gore, J. C. , Banaji, M. R. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15, 806–813. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Haan, M. , Pascalis, O. , Johnson, M. H. (2002). Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 199–209. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diamond, R. , Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107–117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dubois, S. , Rossion, B. , Schiltz, C. , Bodart, J. M. , Michel, C. , Bruyer, R. , Crommelinck, M. (1999). Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces. NeuroImage, 9, 278–289. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694–705. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emery, N. J. , Amaral, D. G. (1999). The role of the primate amygdala in social cognition. In R. D. Lane, L. Nadel (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion (pp. 156–191). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gajewski, P. D. , Schlegel, K. , Stoerig, P. (2008). Effect of human race and face inversion on the N170. Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 157–165. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Halgren, E. , Raij, T. , Marinkovic, K. , Jousmäki, V. , Hari, R. (2000). Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 69–81. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haxby, J. V. , Hoffman, E. A. , Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223–233. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kanwisher, N. , Stanley, D. , Harris, A. (1999). The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals. Neuroreport, 10, 183–187. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Itier, R. J. , Latinus, M. , Taylor, M. J. (2006). Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity?. NeuroImage, 29, 667–676. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Itier, R. J. , Van Roon, P. , Alain, C. (2011). Species sensitivity of early face and eye processing. NeuroImage, 54, 705–713. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joseph, J. E. (2001). Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: A critical review and meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 119–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LeDoux, J. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23, 727–738. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Levin, D. T. , Beale, J. M. (2000). Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 386–401. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McNeil, J. E. , Warrington, E. K. (1993). Prosopagnosia: A face-specific disorder. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 46, 1–10. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morris, J. S. , Friston, K. J. , Buchel, C. , Frith, C. D. , Young, A. W. , Calder, A. J. , Dolan, R. J. (1998). A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain, 121, 47–57. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pascalis, O. , Bachevalier, J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: A cross species study. Behavioural Processes, 43, 87–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pascalis, O. , de Haan, M. , Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321–1323. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perrett, D. I. , Rolls, E. T. , Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 328–342. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phelps, E. A. , O’Connor, K. J. , Cunningham, W. A. , Funayama, E. S. , Gatenby, J. C. , Gore, J. C. , Banaji, M. R. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal for Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729–738. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rolls, E. T. (1992). Neurophysiology and functions of the primate amygdala. In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction (pp. 143–165). New York, NY: Wiley-Liss. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rossion, B. , Gauthier, I. (2002). How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 62–74. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rossion, B. , Joyce, C. , Cottrell, G. W. , Tarr, M. J. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage, 20, 1609–1624. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rossion, B. , Kung, C. , Tarr, M. J. (2004). Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 14521–14526. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rousselet, G. A. , Macé, M. J. , Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2004). Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? Journal of Vision, 4, 13–21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sams, M. , Hietanen, J. K. , Hari, R. , Ilmoniemi, R. J. , Lounasmaa, O. V. (1997). Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroscience, 77, 49–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thierry, G. , Martin, C. D. , Downing, P. , Pegna, A. J. (2007). Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 505–511. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tong, F. , Nakayama, K. , Moscovitch, M. , Weinrib, O. , Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wild-Wall, N. , Dimigen, O. , Sommer, W. (2008). Interaction of facial expressions and familiarity: ERP evidence. Biological Psychology, 77, 138–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whalen, P. J. , Rauch, S. L. , Etcoff, N. , McInerney, S. C. , Lee, M. B. , Jenike, M. A. (1998). Masked presentations of emotional facial expressions modulate amygdala activity without explicit knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 411–418. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar