Skip to main content
Original Articles

Validation of the French Version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.125

Abstract. The study was designed to investigate the psychometric properties of the French version and the cross-language replicability of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). The HiPIC is an instrument to assess the five dimensions of the five-factor model for children. Subjects were 552 children aged between 8 and 12 years, rated by one or both parents. At the domain level, reliability ranged from .83 to .93 and at the facet level, reliability ranged from .69 to .89. Differences between genders were congruent with those found in the Dutch sample. Girls scored higher on Benevolence and Conscientiousness. Age was negatively correlated with Extraversion and Imagination. For girls, we also observed a decrease of Emotional Stability. A series of exploratory factor analyses confirmed the overall five-factor structure for girls and boys. Targeted factor analyses and congruence coefficients revealed high cross-language replicability at the domain and at the facet levels. The results showed that the French version of the HiPIC is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing personality with children and has a particularly high cross-language replicability.

References

  • Allik, J. Laidra, K. Realo, A. Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445– 462 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aluja, A. García, O. Rossier, J. García, L.F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591– 604 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J.B. van Aken, M.A.G. (2003). Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9-year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17, 1– 17 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T. Herbst, J.H. McCrae, R.R. Siegler, I.C. (2000). Personality at midlife: Stability, intrinsic maturation, and response to life events. Assessment, 7, 365– 378 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T. McCrae, R.R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 219-237). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T. Terracciano, A. McCrae, R.R. (2000). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322– 331 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Clercq, B. De Fruyt, F. Van Leeuwen, K. (2004). A “little five” lexically based perspective on personality disorder symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 479– 499 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Clercq, B. De Fruyt, F. Koot, H.M. Benoit, Y. (2004). Quality of life in children surviving cancer: A personality and multiinformant perspective. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 579– 590 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Fruyt, F. Mervielde, I. Hoekstra, H.A. Rolland, J.-P. (2000). Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329– 345 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Fruyt, F. Vollrath, M. (2003). Interparent agreement on higher and lower level traits in two countries. Effects of parent and child gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 289– 301 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417– 440 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W.G. Jensen-Campbell, L.A. Finch, J.F. (1997). The self as a mediator between personality and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 392– 404 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohnstamm, G.A. Halverson, C.F. Mervielde, I. Havill, V.L. (1998). Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big Five? . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lamb, M.E. Chuang, S.S. Wessels, H. Broberg, A.G. Hwang, C.P. (2002). Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five in early childhood: A longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Development, 73, 1517– 1524 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L.A. Perving & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed. pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. de Lima, P.M. Simoes, A. Ostendorf, F. Angleitner, A. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult lifespan: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466– 477 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. Terracciano, A. Parker, W.D. Mills, C.J. De Fruyt, F. (2002). Personality traits development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456– 1468 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. Zonderman, A.B. Costa, P.T. Bond, M.H. Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552– 566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mervielde, I. Asendorpf, J. (2000). Variable centered and person-centered approaches to childhood personality. In S. Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37-76). London: Routledge First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mervielde, I. De Fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Personality Psychology (pp. 107-127). Netherlands: Tilburg University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mervielde, I. De Fruyt, F. (2002). Assessing children's traits with the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 129-146). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis . New York: McGraw-Hill First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R.W. Fraley, R.C. Roberts, B.W. Trzesniewski, K.H. (2001). A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617– 640 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R.W. Trzesniewski, K.H. Tracy, J.L. Gosling, S.D. Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 423– 434 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rossier, J. (2005). A review of the cross-cultural equivalence of several frequently used personality inventories. International Journal of Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5, 175– 188 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rossier, J. Dahourou, D. McCrae, R.R. (2005). Structural and mean level analyses of the five-factor model and locus of control: Further evidence from Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 227– 246 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rossier, J. Meyer de Stadelhofen, F. Berthoud, S. (2004). A comparison of the hierarchical structures of the NEO-PI-R and of the 16PF5. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 27– 38 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rossier, J. Wenger, S. Berthoud, S. (2001). Validation interne de la version française du NEO-PI-R et influence de l'âge, du sexe et de la profession. [Internal validation of the French version of the NEO-PI-R and impact of age, gender, and profession] Psychologie et Psychométrie, 22, 59– 82 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shiner, R.L. Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development, and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 2– 32 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Leeuwen, K. De Fruyt, F. Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children's and adolescents' problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210– 220 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar