Validation of the French Version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC)
Abstract
Abstract. The study was designed to investigate the psychometric properties of the French version and the cross-language replicability of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). The HiPIC is an instrument to assess the five dimensions of the five-factor model for children. Subjects were 552 children aged between 8 and 12 years, rated by one or both parents. At the domain level, reliability ranged from .83 to .93 and at the facet level, reliability ranged from .69 to .89. Differences between genders were congruent with those found in the Dutch sample. Girls scored higher on Benevolence and Conscientiousness. Age was negatively correlated with Extraversion and Imagination. For girls, we also observed a decrease of Emotional Stability. A series of exploratory factor analyses confirmed the overall five-factor structure for girls and boys. Targeted factor analyses and congruence coefficients revealed high cross-language replicability at the domain and at the facet levels. The results showed that the French version of the HiPIC is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing personality with children and has a particularly high cross-language replicability.
References
Allik, J. Laidra, K. Realo, A. Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445– 462Aluja, A. García, O. Rossier, J. García, L.F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591– 604Asendorpf, J.B. van Aken, M.A.G. (2003). Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9-year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17, 1– 17Costa, P.T. Herbst, J.H. McCrae, R.R. Siegler, I.C. (2000). Personality at midlife: Stability, intrinsic maturation, and response to life events. Assessment, 7, 365– 378Costa, P.T. McCrae, R.R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 219-237). New York: GuilfordCosta, P.T. Terracciano, A. McCrae, R.R. (2000). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322– 331De Clercq, B. De Fruyt, F. Van Leeuwen, K. (2004). A “little five” lexically based perspective on personality disorder symptoms in adolescence. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 479– 499De Clercq, B. De Fruyt, F. Koot, H.M. Benoit, Y. (2004). Quality of life in children surviving cancer: A personality and multiinformant perspective. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 579– 590De Fruyt, F. Mervielde, I. Hoekstra, H.A. Rolland, J.-P. (2000). Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329– 345De Fruyt, F. Vollrath, M. (2003). Interparent agreement on higher and lower level traits in two countries. Effects of parent and child gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 289– 301Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417– 440Graziano, W.G. Jensen-Campbell, L.A. Finch, J.F. (1997). The self as a mediator between personality and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 392– 404Kohnstamm, G.A. Halverson, C.F. Mervielde, I. Havill, V.L. (1998). Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big Five? . Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumLamb, M.E. Chuang, S.S. Wessels, H. Broberg, A.G. Hwang, C.P. (2002). Emergence and construct validation of the Big Five in early childhood: A longitudinal analysis of their ontogeny in Sweden. Child Development, 73, 1517– 1524McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L.A. Perving & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed. pp. 139-153). New York: GuilfordMcCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. de Lima, P.M. Simoes, A. Ostendorf, F. Angleitner, A. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult lifespan: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466– 477McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T. Terracciano, A. Parker, W.D. Mills, C.J. De Fruyt, F. (2002). Personality traits development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456– 1468McCrae, R.R. Zonderman, A.B. Costa, P.T. Bond, M.H. Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552– 566Mervielde, I. Asendorpf, J. (2000). Variable centered and person-centered approaches to childhood personality. In S. Hampson (Ed.), Advances in personality psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37-76). London: RoutledgeMervielde, I. De Fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe. Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Personality Psychology (pp. 107-127). Netherlands: Tilburg University PressMervielde, I. De Fruyt, F. (2002). Assessing children's traits with the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 129-146). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & HuberMulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis . New York: McGraw-HillRobins, R.W. Fraley, R.C. Roberts, B.W. Trzesniewski, K.H. (2001). A longitudinal study of personality change in young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 69, 617– 640Robins, R.W. Trzesniewski, K.H. Tracy, J.L. Gosling, S.D. Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 423– 434Rossier, J. (2005). A review of the cross-cultural equivalence of several frequently used personality inventories. International Journal of Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5, 175– 188Rossier, J. Dahourou, D. McCrae, R.R. (2005). Structural and mean level analyses of the five-factor model and locus of control: Further evidence from Africa. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 227– 246Rossier, J. Meyer de Stadelhofen, F. Berthoud, S. (2004). A comparison of the hierarchical structures of the NEO-PI-R and of the 16PF5. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 27– 38Rossier, J. Wenger, S. Berthoud, S. (2001). Validation interne de la version française du NEO-PI-R et influence de l'âge, du sexe et de la profession. [Internal validation of the French version of the NEO-PI-R and impact of age, gender, and profession] Psychologie et Psychométrie, 22, 59– 82Shiner, R.L. Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development, and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 2– 32Van Leeuwen, K. De Fruyt, F. Mervielde, I. (2004). A longitudinal study of the utility of the resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types as predictors of children's and adolescents' problem behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 210– 220