The Personal Structure of Personal Need for Structure
Abstract
Abstract. This study investigated the responses of N = 1,789 participants to a set of 12 Likert-type items for the assessment of personal need for structure (PNS). Mixture-distribution Rasch models were used to analyze the homogeneity of the response format across items and the homogeneity of the item parameters and category parameters across persons. Model selection yielded a two-class rating scale model as the favorite model. This model contains the assumptions that the Likert response scale is used in a constant way for all items but that the item or category parameters differ between two latent subpopulations. The parameter estimates revealed large differences in the threshold parameters for the response categories between the two subpopulations. While the larger subpopulation showed a tendency to avoid extreme response categories, the smaller subpopulation used the whole range of the response scale. The different response styles identified by the mixture-distribution Rasch analysis were validated by significantly higher Extraversion scores for participants in the smaller subpopulation that showed more extreme and impulsive rating behavior. The results confirmed that PNS reflects quantitative interindividual differences, and they also showed that the total score of the 12 PNS items forms a combination of the latent PNS trait and response style.
References
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561– 573Andrich, D. (1982). An extension of the Rasch model for ratings providing both location and dispersion parameters. Psychometrika, 47, 105– 113Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI) . [NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)]. Göttingen: HogrefeEid, M. , Zickar, M.J. (2007). Detecting response styles and faking in personality and organizational assessments by mixed Rasch models. In M. von Davier & C.H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. Extensions and applications (pp. 255-270). New York: Springer Science + Business MediaFischer, G.H. , Molenaar, I.W. Eds. (1995). Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications . New York: Springer-VerlagMachunsky, M. , Meiser, T. (2006). Personal need for structure als differenzialpsychologisches Konstrukt in der Sozialpsychologie: Psychometrische Analyse und Validierung einer deutschsprachigen PNS-Skala. [Personal need for structure as a construct of dispositional differences in social psychology: Psychometric analysis and validation of a German PNS scale] Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 87– 97Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149– 174McLachlan, G. , Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models . New York: WileyMislevy, R.J. , Verhelst, N. (1990). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika, 55, 195– 215Moskowitz, G.B. (1993). Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 132– 142Neuberg, S.L. , Newsom, J.T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113– 131Perreault, S. , Bourhis, R.Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92– 103Rasch, G. (1968). An individualistic approach to item analysis. In P.F. Lazarsfeld & N.W. Henry (Eds.), Readings in mathematical social science (pp. 89-107). Cambridge: MIT PressRasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests . Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original published 1960, Copenhagen: Danish Institute of Educational Research)Rost, J. (1988). Measuring attitudes with a threshold model drawing on a traditional scaling concept. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 397– 409Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271– 282Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 75– 92Rost, J. , Carstensen, C.H. , von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed Rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 324-332). Münster: WaxmannRost, J. , Carstensen, C.H. , von Davier, M. (1999). Sind die Big Five Rasch-skalierbar? Eine Reanalyse der NEO-FFI-Normierungsdaten. [Are the Big Five Rasch-scalable? A reanalysis of the NEO-FFI norm data] Diagnostica, 45, 119– 127Schaller, M. , Boyd, C. , Yohannes, J. , O'Brien, M. (1995). The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 544– 555Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461– 464Thompson, E.P. , Roman, R.J. , Moskowitz, G.B. , Chaiken, S. , Bargh, J.A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474– 489Thompson, M.M. , Naccarato, M.E. , Parker, K.C.H. , Moskowitz, G.B. (2001). The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions. In G.B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 19-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaumvon Davier, M. (1997). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse categorical data - Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Methods of Psychological Research, 2, 29– 48von Davier, M. (2001). WINMIRA 2001 - A Windows program for analyses with the Rasch model, with the latent class analysis, and with the mixed Rasch model . Software distributed by Assessment Systems Corporation, USA, and Science Plus Group, Groningen, The Netherlandsvon Davier, M. , Carstensen, C.H. Eds. (in press). Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. Extensions and applications . New York: Springer Science + Business Mediavon Davier, M. , Rost, J. (1995). Polytomous mixed Rasch models. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 371- 379). New York: Springer-Verlagvon Davier, M. , Yamamoto, K. (2007). Mixture distribution and hybrid Rasch models. In M. von Davier & C.H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. Extensions and applications (pp. 99-115). New York: Springer-Verlag