Abstract
The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and its screening version, the PCL:SV, are clinical assessment instruments for the observer rating of psychopathic personality in offenders. Given the link between PCL-R/SV total scores and violent offending, these instruments have been incorporated into various risk assessment protocols in forensic psychology. The purpose of the present study was to examine the predictive validity of the PCL-R/SV instruments in German-speaking countries. We collated data from 11 published studies (total-N = 2,412 offenders). Based on suitable diagnostic cutscores for prototypical psychopathy, the proportions of true-positive and false-positive cases with respect to violent reoffending were compared. Overall, sensitivity was estimated at 27% and specificity at 88% for the PCL-R (or at 28% and 90% for the PCL:SV, respectively). At critical score levels, the odds for violent offense recidivism were more than two times higher than at subcritical levels for both instruments. A decision-theory analysis suggested that the implicit utility of false-positive risk assessments was about halfway between the minimal utility of false-negative assessments and the maximal utility of correct assessments. Both the PCL-R and its screening version are viable instruments for the prediction of violent offense recidivism in German-speaking countries.
References
(1995). A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition, 57, 1–29. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-P
(2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 698–718. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
(1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20. Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
(1997). Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 981–991. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<981::AID-SIM510>3.0.CO;2-N
(2010). Mesolimbic dopamine reward system hypersensitivity in individuals with psychopathic traits. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 419–421. doi: 10.1038/nn.2510
(2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567–590. doi: 10.1177/0093854809333610
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2010). Antisocial personality disorder is on a continuum with psychopathy. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 426–433. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.006
(2009). Gender differences in structured risk assessment: Comparing the accuracy of five instruments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 337–348. doi: 10.1037/a0015155
(2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 259–274. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9176-x
(1999). Evaluating the screening version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL:SV): An item-response theory analysis. Psychological Assessment, 11, 3–13. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.3
(2005). Psychologische Kriminalprognose: Wege zu einer integrativen Methodik für die Beurteilung der Rückfallwahrscheinlichkeit bei Strafgefangenen
[Psychological prognosis of criminal reoffending: Ways toward an integrative methodology for the assessment of the probability for reoffending among prison inmates] . Herbolzheim, Germany: Centaurus.(2006). Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of criminal reoffence in a German prison sample: A comparative study of LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29, 431–442. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp. 2006.03.001
(2004). Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. British Medical Journal, 329, 168–169. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168
(2000). Violence risk prediction: Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303–311. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.4.303
(2007). Midas: A program for meta-analytical integration of diagnostic accuracy studies in Stata, Vol. 2011, Ann Arbor, MI: Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School.
(2009). midas: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. [online document]. Retrieved from http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/m/midas.pdf
(2009). Psychopathische Persönlichkeitscharakteristika bei einer Gruppe von verurteilten Sexualstraftätern: Zusammenhänge zwischen Tätertypus und Einfluss auf Rückfälligkeit
[Psychopathic personality traits in a group of convicted sexual offenders: Relationships between offender type and influence on reoffending] . Neuropsychiatrie, 23(Suppl. 1), 1–6.(2012). Dimensionale Struktur und prognostische Relevanz der PCL-R in einer Population österreichischer Sexualstraftäter
[Dimensional structure and prognostic relevance of the PCL-R in a population of Austrian sexual offenders] . Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 95, 235–251.(2012). Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 575–584. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2013
(1999). Predicting recidivism: LSI-R vs. PCL-R. Canadian Psychology Abstracts, 40, 2a.
(1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works? Criminology, 34, 575–607. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x
(2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397–426. doi: 10.1177/0093854802029004004
(2003). Erratum. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 722–724. doi: 10.1177/0093854803256464
(2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x
(2012). The potential role of the striatum in antisocial behavior and psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 817–822. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.027
(2007). Psychopathic disorders and the criminal law in Switzerland. In , The international handbook on psychopathic disorders and the law (Vol. 2): Laws and policies (pp. 229–242). Chichester, UK: Wiley doi: 10.1002/9780470772973.ch16
(2007). A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: Evidence for dimensionality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 701–716. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.701
(2006). Examining the utility of the PCL:SV as a screening measure using competing factor models of psychopathy. Psychological Assessment, 18, 225–230. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.225
(2010). Individual confidence intervals do not inform decision-makers about the accuracy of risk assessment evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 275–281. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9227-3
(2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
(2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 154–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07303.x
(2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136. doi: 10.1023/A:1005482921333
(1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8
(1991). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
(2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R): (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
(2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452
(2010). The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: Comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22, 446–454. doi: 10.1037/a0013635
(2007). Characterizing the value of actuarial violence risk assessments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1638–1658. doi: 10.1177/0093854807307029
(2013). Bayes and base rates: What is an informative prior for actuarial violence risk assessment? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31, 103–124. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2048
(1995). Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 167–178. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.167
(2013). Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31, 81–102. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2049
(1995). Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Screening Version (PCL:SV). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
(2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the “margins of error” of group v. individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(Suppl. 49), 60–65. doi: 10.1192/bjp.190.5.s60
(2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 25, 233–243. doi: 10.1037/a0030391
(1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
(1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139–170. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x
(2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186
(2008). Criminal recidivism in sexual homicide perpetrators. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 5–20. doi: 10.1177/0306624X07307450
(2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV) in offenders with axis I disorders. Psychological Assessment, 16, 90–95. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.90
(1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
(2010). Do core interpersonal and affective traits of PCL-R psychopathy interact with antisocial behavior and disinhibition to predict violence? Psychological Assessment, 22, 569–580. doi: 10.1037/a0019618
(2006). Katamnestische Ergebnisse der Begutachtung von 138 Straftätern zur Frage der bedingten Entlassung
[Follow-up results on the mental health assessment of 138 offenders on the question of conditional release] . Neuropsychiatrie, 20, 64–70.(2012). Aggressive behavior and measurement of psychopathy in female inmates of German prisons – A preliminary study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp. 2012.02.007
(2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6
(2007). Risks of diagnosing psychopathic disorders. In , The international handbook of psychopathic disorders and the law (Vol. 1): Diagnosis and treatment (pp. 136–146). Chichester, UK: Wiley doi: 10.1002/9780470516157.ch8
(1957). A study of anxiety in the sociopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 6–10. doi: 10.1037/h0047232
(1994). Foundations of medical diagnosis: What actually are the parameters involved in Bayes’ theorem? Statistics in Medicine, 13, 201–209. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130302
(2013). Normative data for the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in German-speaking countries: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0093854813492519
(2010). Assessment of risk for violent recidivism through multivariate Bayesian classification. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16, 418–450. doi: 10.1037/a0021312
(2005). Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York, NY: Springer.
(2003). Judicial decision thresholds for violence risk management. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 1–6. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2003.10471174
(1996). Limitations of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and Bayes’ theorem in assessing diagnostic probabilities: A clinical example. Epidemiology, 8, 12–17. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199701000-00002
(1994a). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783–792. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
(1994b). Further comments on portraying the accuracy of violence predictions. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 587–593. doi: 10.1007/BF01499177
(1995). Dangerousness decisions: An essay on the mathematics of clinical violence prediction and involuntary hospitalization. University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 2, 95–138.
(2001). Intervals for posttest probabilities: A comparison of five methods. Medical Decision Making, 21, 498–507. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100608
(2007). Avoiding errors about “margins of error”. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 561 doi: 10.1192/bjp.191.6.561
(1992). Balancing risks and benefits: Another approach to optimizing diagnostic tests. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 4, 331–335.
(2007). The super-ordinate nature of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 102–117. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.102
(1986). Passive avoidance learning in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 252–256. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.95.3.252
(2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
(1985). Die Prognose im Massregelvollzug als kalkuliertes Risiko
[Prognosis in forensic psychiatry as calculated risk] . In Festschrift für Günter Blau zum 70. Geburtstag am 18. Dezember 1985 (pp. 309–325). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.(2013). The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: A meta-analytic review. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 1–14. doi: 10.1037/a0026482
(2008). Prognostische Validität der PCL:SV zur Vorhersage krimineller Rückfälle bei deutschen Straftätern
[Prognostic validity of the PCL:SV for the prediction of offense relapses in German criminal offenders] . Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 91, 405–415.(2010). Prospective actuarial risk assessment: A comparison of five assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 169–186. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08328755
(2010). Rückfälligkeit nach Entlassung aus dem Strafvollzug in der Schweiz: Die Validität des HCR-20
[Reoffending after release from prison in Switzerland: The validity of the HCR-20] . Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 161, 254–259.(2008). A probability-based measure of effect size: Robustness to base rates and other factors. Psychological Methods, 13, 19–30. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.19
(1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clincial Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00071.x
(2004). Meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
(2012). A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 237–246. doi: 10.1037/h0093973
(2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25, 980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
(2010a). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22, 433–445. doi: 10.1037/a0008512
(2010b). One measure does not a construct make: Directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research – Reply to Hare and Neumann (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22, 455–459. doi: 10.1037/a0014862
(2011). Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 38–42. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397271
(1991). “Biological markers” and psychiatric diagnosis: Risk-benefit balancing using ROC analysis. Biological Psychiatry, 29, 811–826. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(91)90200-6
(2006). Rückfallprognosen bei Sexualstraftätern – Vergleich der prädiktiven Validität von Prognoseinstrumenten
[Evaluation of risk assessment instruments for sex offenders] . Nervenarzt, 77, 587–595. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1945-2(2005). Psychopathic traits and risk of criminal recidivism in offenders with and without mental disorders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4, 89–97. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2005.10471215
(2004). Validität von Risikokalkulationen bei Straftätern – Kritik an einer methodischen Grundannahme und zukünftige Perspektiven
[Validity of risk calculations in offenders – Criticism of a basic methodological assumption, and future perspectives] . Fortschritte der Neurologie & Psychiatrie, 72, 260–269. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818395(2007). Violent and sexual offences: A validation of the predictive quality of the PCL:SV in Switzerland. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.04.001
(2007). Die prädiktive Qualität der Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) bei Gewalt- und Sexualstraftätern in der Schweiz
[The predictive quality of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) for violent and sex offenders in Switzerland: A validation study] . Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie, 75, 155–159. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-932203(2005). Testing of a four-factor model of psychopathy: Associations with gender, ethnicity, intelligence and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 466–476. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.466
(2007). A taxometric analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV): Further evidence of dimensionality. Psychological Assessment, 19, 330–339. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.330
(2008). Incremental validity of the Psychopathy Checklist facet scores: Predicting release outcome in six samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 396–405. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.396
(1997). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
(1996). DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder field trial. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 3–16. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.3
(2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes’s theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56–85. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.12.1.56
(2002). In cold blood: Characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 436–445. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.111.3.436
(2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi: 10.1037/a0020473
(2008). We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 687–697. doi: 10.1002/sim.2992
