Skip to main content
Multistudy Report

Development of the Teacher Attitudes Towards Self-Regulated Learning Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000322

Abstract. We describe the development and validation of an instrument for measuring the affective component of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning. The questionnaire assesses the affective component towards those cognitive and metacognitive strategies that are especially effective in primary school. In a first study (n = 230), the factor structure was verified via an exploratory factor analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis with data from a second study (n = 400) indicated that the theoretical factor structure is appropriate. A comparison with four alternative models identified the theoretically derived factor structure as the most appropriate. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures the degree to which teachers create learning environments that enable students to self-regulate their learning. Retrospective validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures teachers’ experiences with self-regulated learning. In a third study (n = 47), the scale’s concurrent validity was tested with scales measuring teachers’ evaluation of the desirability of different aspects of self-regulated learning in class. Additionally, predictive validity was demonstrated via a binary logistic regression, with teachers attitudes as predictor on their registration for a workshop on self-regulated learning and their willingness to implement a seven-week training program on self-regulated learning.

References

  • Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P. & Burden, R. (2010). A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 20, 191–211. doi: 10.1080/713663717 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Banaji, M. R. & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In S. T. FiskeD. T. GilbertG. LindzeyEds., Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 353–393). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bleeker, M. M. & Jacobs, J. E. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 97–109. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191–1205. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion, [Introduction to the test and questionnaire construction] (3rd ed.). Munich, Germany: Pearson Studium. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Council of the European Union (2002, July 9). Resolution of 27 June, 2002, on lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Communities, 45, C163/1–C163/3. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dignath, C. & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dignath, C., Buettner, G. & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dignath-van Ewijk, C. & van der Werf, G. (2012). What teachers think about self-regulated learning: Investigating teacher beliefs and teacher behavior of enhancing students’ self-regulation. Education Research International, 2012, 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2012/741713 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dix, A. C. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs and practices about self-regulated learning in secondary mathematics classrooms, Retrieved from http://ebookbrowsee.net/dix-a-pdf-d656345572 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. PratkanisS. J. BrecklerA. G. GreenwaldEds., Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–180). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H., Chen, J.-M., McDonel, E. C. & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339–357. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. & Olson, M. A. (2003). Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In M. A. HoggJ. CooperEds., The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 139–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 162–202). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J. & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hermans, R., van Braak, J. & van Keer, H. (2006). Development of the beliefs about primary education scale: Distinguishing a developmental and transmissive dimension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 127–139. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huskinson, T. L. H. & Haddock, G. (2006). Individual differences in attitude structure and the accessibility of the affective and cognitive components of attitude. Social Cognition, 24, 453–468. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katz, D. & Stotland, E. (1959). A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change. In S. KochEd., Psychology: A study of a science (pp. 423–475). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Killus, D. (2009). Förderung selbstgesteuerten Lernens im Kontext lehrer- und organisationsbezogener Merkmale.[Promoting self-directed learning in the context of teachers and organization-related features] Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55, 130–150. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75. doi: 10.1177/0146167295211007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lombaerts, K., de Backer, F., Engels, N., van Braak, J. & Athanasou, J. (2009). Development of the self-regulated learning teacher belief scale. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 79–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lombaerts, K., Engels, N. & van Braak, J. (2009). Determinants of teachers’ recognitions of self-regulated learning practices in elementary education. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 163–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of Golden Rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O.. (1998–2010). Mplus (Version 6.0). Los Angeles, CA: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12–30. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L. & Thauberger, C. (2007). Mentoring student teachers to design and implement literacy tasks that support self-regulated reading and writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 27–50. doi: 10.1080/10573560600837636 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, N. E. & Rahim, A. (2011). Studying self-regulated learning in classrooms. In B. J. ZimmermanD. H. SchunkEds., Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 122–136). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P. & Brehm, J. W. (1969). Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (4th ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stoeger, H., Sontag, C. & Ziegler, A. (2014). Impact of a teacher-led intervention on preference for self-regulated learning, finding main ideas in expository texts, and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 799–814. doi: 10.1037/a0036035 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stoeger, H., Steinbach, J., Obergriesser, S. & Matthes, B. (2014). What is more important for fourth-grade primary school students for transforming their potential into achievement: The individual or the environmental box in multidimensional conceptions of giftedness? High Ability Studies, 25, 5–21. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2014.914381 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stoeger, H. & Ziegler, A. (2008). Evaluation of a classroom based training to improve self-regulation in time management tasks during homework activities with fourth graders. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 207–230. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stoeger, H. & Ziegler, A. (2011). Self-regulatory training through elementary-school students’ homework completion. In B. J. ZimmermanD. H. SchunkEds., Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 87–101). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tillema, H. H. (2000). Belief change towards self-directed learning in student teachers: Immersion in practice or reflection on action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 575–591. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G. & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 23–35. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weinstein, C. E. & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. WittrockEd., Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Woolley, S. L., Benjamin, W. J. & Woolley, A. W. (2004). Construct validity of a self-report measure of teacher beliefs related to constructivist and traditional approaches to teaching and learning. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 319–331. doi: 10.1177/0013164403261189 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, A. & Stoeger, H. (2005). Trainingshandbuch selbstreguliertes Lernen I. Lernökologische Strategien für Schüler der 4. Jahrgangsstufe Grundschule zur Verbesserung mathematischer Kompetenzen, [Accompanying manual for a training program for self-regulated learning I: Resource strategies for fourth-grade elementary school students to improve math skills] Lengerich, Germany: Pabst. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social-cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. BoekaertsP. R. PintrichM. ZeidnerEds., Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar