Measurement Invariance of the Parent Version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Across Community and Clinical Populations
Abstract
Abstract. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a popular screening instrument for the detection of social-emotional and behavioral problems in children in community and clinical settings. To sensibly compare SDQ scores across these settings, the SDQ should measure psychosocial difficulties and strengths in the same way across community and clinical populations, that is, the SDQ should be measurement invariant across both populations. We examined whether measurement invariance of the parent version of the SDQ holds using data from a community sample (N = 707) and a clinical sample (N = 931). The results of our analysis suggest that measurement invariance of the SDQ parent version across community and clinical populations is tenable, implying that one can compare the SDQ scores of children across these populations. This is a favorable result since it is common clinical practice to interpret the scores of a clinical individual relative to norm scores that are based on community samples. The findings of this study support the continued use of the parent version of the SDQ in community and clinical settings.
References
2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(2008). A comparison of four scoring methods based on the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as used in the Dutch preventive child health care system. BMC Public Health, 8, 106–113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-106
(2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of French-speaking adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 1–8. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.1
(2010). The Dutch review process for evaluating the Quality of Psychological Tests: History, procedure, and results. International Journal of Testing, 10, 295–317. doi: 10.1080/15305058.2010.518325
(1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38, 581–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
(1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–799. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00494
(2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 380–406. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2003). Use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as an outcome measure in a child and adolescent mental health service. Australasian Psychiatry, 11, 334–337. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1665.2003.00544.x
(1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825
(2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4
(1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2007). Examining the structural validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in a US sample of custodial grandmothers. Psychological Assessment, 19, 189–198. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.189
(1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.
(2009). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in the Bergen Child Study: A conceptually and methodically motivated structural analysis. Psychological Assessment, 21, 352–364. doi: 10.1037/a0016317
(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74.
(2013). Effectiveness of Primary Care Triple P on child psychosocial problems in preventive child healthcare: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 11, 240–247. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-240
(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi: 173-180.1991-03242-001
(2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2
(2013). The parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Omega as an alternative to alpha and a test for measurement invariance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 44–50. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000119
(2010). Sex differences in adults’ motivation to achieve. Intelligence, 38, 433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.04.004
(2007). Multiple imputation for item scores when test data are factorially complex. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 60, 315–337. doi: 10.1348/000711006X117574
(2010). Incidence of missing item scores in personality measurement, and simple item-score imputation. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 17–30. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000003
(2003). Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 281–289. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0341-3
(2009). Comparing three short questionnaires to detect psychosocial dysfunction among primary school children: A randomized method. BMC Public Health, 9, 489–500. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-489
(2012). Uses of the SDQ, Retrieved from http://www.sdqinfo.org/d0.html
. (2011). Teacher ratings of children’s behavior problems and functional impairment across gender and ethnicity: Construct equivalence of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 466–481. doi: 10.1177/0022022110362752
(