A Need for Cognition Scale for Children and Adolescents
Structural Analysis and Measurement Invariance
Abstract
Abstract. Need for Cognition (NFC) signifies “the tendency for an individual to engage in and enjoy thinking” (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982, p. 116). Up to now, no scale of sufficient psychometric quality existed to assess NFC in children. Using data from three independent, diverse cross-sectional samples from Germany, Luxembourg, and Finland, we examined the psychometric properties of a new NFC scale intended to fill in this gap. In all samples, across grade levels ranging from 1 to 9, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized nested factor structure based on Mussel’s (2013) Intellect model, with one general factor Think influencing all items and two specific factors Seek and Conquer each influencing a subset of items. At least partial scalar measurement invariance with regard to grade level and sex could be demonstrated. The scale exhibited good psychometric properties and showed convergent and discriminant validity with an established NFC scale and other noncognitive traits such as academic self-concept and interests. It incrementally predicted mostly statistically significant but relatively small portions of academic achievement variance over and above academic self-concept and interest. Implications for research on the development of NFC and its role as an investment trait in intellectual development are discussed.
References
1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.
(2014). Adolescent and adult intellectual development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 246–251. doi: 10.1177/0963721414534960
(2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. MplusTechnical Appendix, Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf
(2011). Validierung einer modifizierten Kurzfassung des Fragebogens zur Erfassung emotionaler und sozialer Schulerfahrungen für die Klassen 1 bis 3.
([Validation of a modified short form of the Questionnaire for the Assessment of emotional and Social School Experiences for grades 1 to 3.] Presented at the 11. Arbeitstagung der Fachgruppe Differentielle Psychologie, Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Psychologische Diagnostik (September 26 to 28, 2011), Saarbrücken2013). Development and validation of the German Test for (Highly) Intelligent Kids – T(H)INK. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 171–181. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000142
(1994). Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben.
([Need for Coginition: A scale for the assessment of engagement and enjoyment during cognitive tasks] Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154.2006). Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality, and the relation with ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 819–828. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.007
(2013). On the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II: G is the key. Psychological Assessment, 25, 136–145. doi: 10.1037/a0029228
(2010). The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 964–981. doi: 10.1037/a0019644
(2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs: Hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00749.x
(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.
(1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
(1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
(1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. New York, NY: Elsevier.
(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.
(1999). The Problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 315–346. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
(2010). How students build their performance expectancies: The importance of need for cognition. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 399–409. doi: 10.1007/s10212-010-0027-4
(2011). Assessing measurement equivalence in ordered-categorical data. Psicológica: Revista de Metodología Y Psicología Experimental, 32, 403–421.
(2012). Predicting interest in and attitudes toward science from personality and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 771–775. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.005
(2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 82–96. doi: 10.1177/0146167209351886
(2013). Need for cognition: Its dimensionality and personality and intelligence correlates. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 230–240. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000119
(2000). Le besoin de cognition: une échelle française pour enfants et ses conséquences au plan sociocognitif.
([Need for Cognition: A French scale for children and its socio-cognitive effects] L’année psychologique, 100, 585–627. doi: 10.3406/psy.2000.286651992). Personality-intelligence relations: assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552.
(2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 121–132.
(2013). Need for cognition is related to higher general intelligence, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence, but not working memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 22–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.11.001
(2013). Dual-processing altruism. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00193. http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/05/how-to-cite-an-article-with-an-article-number-instead-of-a-page-range.html
(2002). Individual differences in child’s reasoning. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto). Retrieved from https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/15218/1/NQ63670.pdf
(2014). Teacher evaluation of student ability: What roles do teacher gender, student gender, and their interaction play? Educational Research, 56, 244–257. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2014.898909
(2001). A comparative-longitudinal study of action-control beliefs and school performance: On the role of context. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 237–245. doi: 10.1080/01650250042000258
(2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514–534. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1104_2
(1984). Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153–174.
(Martin R.Ugen S.Fischbach A. (Eds.). (2015). Épreuves Standardisées: Bildungsmonitoring für Luxemburg. Nationaler Bericht 2011 bis 2013
[Épreuves Standardisées: School monitoring for Luxembourg. National report 2011 to 2013] . Esch, Luxembourg: University of Luxembourg, LUCET. Retrieved from http://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/210462008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
(2014). Motivational characteristics of students in gifted classes: The pivotal role of need for cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.006
(2001). PISA 2000. Kompetenzen von Schülern im internationalen Vergleich: Nationaler Bericht Luxemburg
([PISA 2000. Students’ competencies in international comparison: National report for Luxembourg] . Retrieved from http://www.script.men.lu/documentation/pdf/publi/pisa/pisa-nat.pdf2010). Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 506–510. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.014
(2013). Intellect: A theoretical framework for personality traits related to intellectual achievements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 885–906. doi: 10.1037/a0031918
(2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/usersguide/Mplus%20user%20guide%20Ver_7_r3_web.pdf
(2004).
(The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion . In J. S. SeiterR. H. GassEds., Perspectives on persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 65–89). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.2014). Assessing need for cognition in early adolescence: Validation of a German adaption of the Cacioppo/Petty scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 65–72. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000170
(2011). Grundschul-NFC: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Need for Cognition bei Grundschulkindern
([Elementary school NFC: A scale for the assessment of need for coginition in elementary school children]. Unpublished research instrument . Trier, Germany: University of Trier.2003). Fragebogen zur Erfassung emotionaler und sozialer Schulerfahrungen von Grundschulkindern dritter und vierter Klassen–FEESS 3–4
([Questionnaire for the Assessment of emotional and social school experiences of third and fourth grade primary school children] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2004). Fragebogen zur Erfassung emotionaler und sozialer Schulerfahrungen von Grundschulkindern erster und zweiter Klassen–FEESS 1–2
([Questionnaire for the Assessment of emotional and social school experiences of first and second grade primary school children] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
(2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling a bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 5–26. doi: 10.1177/0013164412449831
(2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. doi: 10.1037/a0029315
(2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838
(2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363. doi: 10.1177/0734282911406661
(2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 167–180. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
(2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.
(2001). Individual differences in social loafing: Need for cognition as a motivator in collective performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 5, 150–158.
(1990). Further validation of the short form of the Need for Cognition Scale. Psychological Reports, 66, 321–322. doi: 10.2466/PR0.66.1.321-322
(2014). Rational thinking and cognitive sophistication: Development, cognitive abilities, and thinking dispositions. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1037–1048. doi: 10.1037/a0034910
(2014). Finnish primary school pupils’ performance in learning to learn assessments: A longitudinal perspective on educational equity (Vol. 360). Helsinki, Finland: Picaset.
(2012). Sources of variability in human communicative skills. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00310. http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/05/how-to-cite-an-article-with-an-article-number-instead-of-a-page-range.html
(2013). Investment and intellect: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 841–869. doi: 10.1037/a0030746
(2007). Integrating personality and intelligence: Typical intellectual engagement and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1635–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.022
(2014). The Role of strategy knowledge for the application of strategies in complex problem solving tasks. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19, 127–146. doi: 10.1007/s10758-014-9222-8
(2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://statmodel2.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf
(2012). Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.002
(