Measurement Invariance of the Serbian Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale Across Age, Gender, and Time
Abstract
Abstract. The present research aimed at examining measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) across age, gender, and time. A total sample in Study 1 consisted of 2,595 participants from Serbia, with a mean age of 23.79 years (age range: 14–55 years). The final sample in Study 2 included 333 Serbian undergraduate students (Mage = 20.81; age range: 20–27 years), who completed the SWLS over periods of 6 and 18 months after the initial assessment. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the modified unidimensional model of the SWLS, with correlated residuals of items 4 and 5 tapping past satisfaction. The results of the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis supported the full scalar invariance across gender and over time and partial scalar invariance across age. Latent mean comparisons revealed that women reported higher life satisfaction than men. Additionally, adolescents reported higher life satisfaction than students and adults, with adults showing the lowest life satisfaction. Our findings indicate that the SWLS allows meaningful comparisons in life satisfaction across age, gender, and over time.
References
1998). The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in an Arabic-speaking sample. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 7, 113–119. doi: 10.1080/02673843.1998.9747816
(1999). The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815–826. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00180-9
(2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and individual Differences, 35, 1255–1260. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00332-X
(2011). The psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale using a nationally representative sample of China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 183–197. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9186-x
(2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psichothema, 20, 872–882.
(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
(2014).
(A research synthesis of validation practices used to evaluate the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) . In B. D. ZumboE. K. H. ChanEds., Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences (pp. 35–67). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07794-92011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the satisfaction with life scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1307–1317. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9859-x
(2011).
(Testing the invariance of values in the Benelux countries with the European Social Survey: Accounting for ordinality . In E. DavidovP. SchmidtJ. BillietEds., Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 149–171). New York, NY: Routledge.2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 558–575. doi: 10.1177/0022022112438397
(2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 55–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
(1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
(2009). Well-being for public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 391–406. doi: 10.1177/008124630903900402
(1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
(2011). The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 127–132. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000058
(2013). Gender and well-being around the world. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1, 212–232. doi: 10.1504/IJHD.2013.055648
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.030
(2016). The validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: A preliminary study. Quality of Life Research, 25, 3173–3180. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1331-5
(2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486–507. doi: 10.1177/0049124114543236
(2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2015). The pursuit of a remedy for gender inequality in wider Europe: Comparison of policies and indices in the EU, Nordic countries, and south east Europe. Economic Annals, 60, 127–156. doi: 10.2298/EKA1504127K
(2010). Approval of equal rights and gender differences in well-being. Journal of Population Economics, 23, 933–962. doi: 10.1007/s00148-009-0257-4
(2010). Longitudinal invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale for individuals with schizophrenia. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 234–241. doi: 10.1177/1049731509347860
(2014, May 5). The 2014 Legatum Prosperity Index. Retrieved from http://media.prosperity.com/2014/pdf/publications/PI2014Brochure_WEB.pdf
(2013). How does subjective well-being evolve with age? A literature review. Journal of Population Ageing, 6, 227–246. doi: 10.1007/s12062-013-9085-0
(2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 112–131.
(2014). Satisfaction with life in adolescents: Evaluation of the factor structure in a Norwegian sample. Social Indicators Research, 118, 657–671. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0451-3
(2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 411–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.002
(2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152. doi: 10.1080/17439760701756946
(2004). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong University students. Psychologia, 46, 225–234. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2003.225
(2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.05008
(1998). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 911–916. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00088-9
(2008). Life satisfaction across adulthood: Different determinants at different ages? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 153–164. doi: 10.1080/17439760701834602
(2007). Stability and specificity of meaning in life and life satisfaction over one year. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 161–179. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9011-8
(2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality and Quantity, 43, 599–616. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x
(2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. Lancet, 385, 640–648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0
(2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 92, 25–33. doi: 10.1007/s11205-008-9295-7
(2008). Gender differences in subjective wellbeing: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85, 329–349. doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9133-3
(2015). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) by gender and age in Angola. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.008
(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
(2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 37–41. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
(2011). Zadovoljstvo životom u Srbiji.
([Satisfaction with life in Serbia] . Primenjena Psihologija, 2, 151–177.2013). Satisfaction with Life Scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E82. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.82
(2011). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of the happiness gender gap. Mimeo Department of Economics, University of Milan-Bicocca: Milan, Italy.
(2016). A cross-national analysis of measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 28, 239–244. doi: 10.1037/pas0000181
(2009). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.002
(2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012
(