Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article

Measurement Invariance of the Resistance to Peer Influence Scale Across Culture and Gender

Published Online:January 31, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000754

Abstract

Abstract. The current study aimed to test for measurement invariance of the Resistance to Peer Influence scale across samples of Chinese, Canadian, and Tanzanian. Participants included N = 3,771 students from four public schools in China (N = 2,073, Mage = 16.36 years, SD = 1.14 years; 925 boys), from sixteen public schools in Canada (N = 642, Mage = 12.13 years, SD = 0.78 years; 321 boys), and from four public schools in Tanzanian (N = 1,056, Mage = 15.87 years, SD = 2.02 years; 558 boys). Students provided self-reports of resistance to peer influence. The results from multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and the alignment optimization method demonstrated that configural, metric, and partial scalar invariances of resistance to peer influence held across gender and all three countries. Chinese boys had the highest factor mean levels and Canadian boys had the lowest. The findings help us understand peer influence resistance across cultures and genders.

References

  • Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, F. C. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060093 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Altikulaç, S., Bos, M. G., Foulkes, L., Crone, E. A., & van Hoorn, J. (2019). Age and gender effects in sensitivity to social rewards in adolescents and young adults. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 171–197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00171 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andrews, J. L., Foulkes, L., & Blakemore, S. J. (2020). Peer influence in adolescence: Public-health implications for COVID-19. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(8), 585–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bell, N. J., & Baron, E. K. (2015). Resistance to peer influence during adolescence: Proposing a sociocultural-developmental framework. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, B. B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. M. LernerL. SteinbergEds., Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 363–394). Wiley. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2017). The maximum likelihood alignment approach to testing for approximate measurement invariance: A paradigmatic cross-cultural application. Psicothema, 29(4), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2017.178 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Sherman, S. J., Montello, D., & McGrew, J. (1986). Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: Longitudinal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation. Developmental Psychology, 22(3), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.3.327 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, X. (2012). Culture, peer interaction, and socioemotional development. Child Development Perspectives, 6(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00187.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, X., Chung, J., & Hsiao, C. (2009). Peer interactions and relationships from a cross-cultural perspective. In K. H. RubinW. M. BukowskiB. LaursenEds., Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 432–452). Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, X., Fu, R., Liu, J., Wang, L., Zarbatany, L., & Ellis, W. (2018). Social sensitivity and social, school, and psychological adjustment among children across contexts. Developmental Psychology, 54(6), 1124–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000496 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, X., Fu, R., Li, D., & Liu, J. (2019). Developmental trajectories of shyness-sensitivity from middle childhood to early adolescence in China: Contributions of peer preference and mutual friendship. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(7), 1197–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-00507-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, X., Liu, J., Ellis, W., & Zarbatany, L. (2016). Social sensitivity and adjustment in Chinese and Canadian children. Child Development, 87(4), 1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12514 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dekkers, L. M., Bexkens, A., Hofman, A. D., Boeck, P. D., Collot d’Escury, A. L., & Huizenga, H. M. (2019). Formal modeling of the resistance to peer influence questionnaire: A comparison of adolescent boys and girls with and without mild-to-borderline intellectual disability. Assessment, 26(6), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117698754 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duell, N., Clayton, M. G., Telzer, E. H., & Prinstein, M. J. (2020). Measuring peer influence susceptibility to alcohol use: Convergent and predictive validity of a new analogue assessment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420965729 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ewing, A. R., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). The role of child gender and ethnicity in teacher–child relationship quality and children’s behavioral adjustment in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.09.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Han, K., Colarelli, S. M., & Weed, N. C. (2019). Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000731 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henneberger, A. K., Mushonga, D. R., & Preston, A. M. (2021). Peer influence and adolescent substance use: A systematic review of dynamic social network research. Adolescent Research Review, 6(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00130-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, K. M., Roberts, M. E., Colby, S. M., Barnett, N. P., Abar, C. C., & Merrill, J. E. (2014). Willingness to drink as a function of peer offers and peer norms in early adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75(3), 404–414. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2014.75.404 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., & Nguyen, D. T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1304822 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laddunuri, M. M. (2013). The sexual behaviour of secondary school adolescent students in Tanzania: Patterns and trends. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 6(3), 472–484. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Luo, J., Yeung, P. S., & Li, H. (2020). Relationship between media multitasking and self-esteem among Chinese adolescents: Mediating roles of peer influence and family functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(5), 1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01613-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2022). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Stephenson, J. C., & Hare, A. L. (2009). Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. In R. M. LernerL. SteinbergEds., Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of adolescent development (pp. 358–403). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1520–1530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017417 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: The alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ngee Sim, T., & Fen Koh, S. (2003). A domain conceptualization of adolescent susceptibility to peer pressure. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In R. M. LernerM. H. BornsteinT. LeventhalEds., Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes in developmental systems (pp. 175–222). Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rudolph, K. D., & Conley, C. S. (2005). The socioemotional costs and benefits of social‐evaluative concerns: Do girls care too much? Journal of Personality, 73(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00306.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sheldon, A. (1992). Preschool girls’ discourse competence: Managing conflict. In K. HallM. BucholtzB. MoomwomonEds., Locating power. Proceedings of the Second Berkley Women and Language Conference (pp. 528–539). University of California, Berkley Women and Language Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shih, T. H., & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smorti, M., Guarnieri, S., & Ingoglia, S. (2014). The parental bond, resistance to peer influence, and risky driving in adolescence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 22, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sumter, S. R., Bokhorst, C. L., Steinberg, L., & Westenberg, P. M. (2009). The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence: Will the teenager ever be able to resist? Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 1009–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Teunissen, H. A., Spijkerman, R., Prinstein, M. J., Cohen, G. L., Engels, R. C., & Scholte, R. H. (2012). Adolescents’ conformity to their peers’ pro‐alcohol and anti‐alcohol norms: The power of popularity. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(7), 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01728.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Urberg, K. A., Shyu, S. J., & Liang, J. (1990). Peer influence in adolescent cigarette smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 15(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(90)90067-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wabukundi, H. (2016). Impact of peer group influence on students performance in secondary schools in Tanzania (case study Kinondoni Division Dar-Es-Salaam). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/3501 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Hart, T. A., Turk, C. L., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2005). Empirical validation and psychometric evaluation of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale in patients with social anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wojciechowski, T. W. (2018). The interaction between the development of deviant peer influence and resistance to peer influence: Relevance for predicting offending in early adulthood. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 4(3), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-018-0086-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1086/374697 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wright, B., & Ogbuehi, A. O. (2014). Surveying adolescents: The impact of data collection methodology on response quality. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 12(1), 41–53. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yetter, G., & Capaccioli, K. (2010). Differences in responses to Web and paper surveys among school professionals. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zanes, A., & Matsoukas, E. (1979). Different Settings, Different Results? A Comparison of School and Home Responses. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 43(4), 550–557. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2748555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhang, X., Pomerantz, E. M., Qin, L., Logis, H., Ryan, A. M., & Wang, M. (2018). Characteristics of likability, perceived popularity, and admiration in the early adolescent peer system in the United States and China. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1568–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000544 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar