Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.165

Abstract. In the present study we analyzed the conceptual relationship of sense of coherence (SOC) to the five-factor model of personality (FFM; i.e., Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness). Participants (109 men, 114 women) were drawn from the ongoing Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality and Social Development (JYLS); which was started when the participants were 8 or 9-years old (in 1968): Data gathered at age 42 were used in this study. SOC was measured by the 13-item Orientation to Life Questionnaire (Antonovsky, 1987) and FFM personality traits with the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, 1989). The results obtained from structural equation modeling (SEM) indicated that a high SOC was strongly associated with Neuroticism (-.85). In addition, SOC showed modest positive associations with Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness. On the basis of the present results, it seems reasonable to assume that SOC and reversed Neuroticism (i.e., emotional stability) are closely related constructs at the conceptual, theoretical, and empirical levels.

References

  • Amelang, M. (1997). Using personality variables to predict cancer and heart disease. European Journal of Personality, 11, 319– 342. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1991). The structural sources of salutogenic strengths. In C.L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Personality and stress: Individual differences on the stress process (pp. 67-104). Chichester: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 725– 733. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238– 246. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P.M. , Bonett (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588– 606. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bono, J.E. , Judge, T.A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 5– 18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Budaev, S.V. (1999). Sex differences in the Big Five personality factors: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 801– 813. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cibson, L.M. , Cook, M.J. (1996). Neuroticism and sense of coherence. Psychological Reports, 9, 343– 349. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr. , McCrae, R.R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr. , McCrae, R.R. (1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T.F. Heatherton & J.L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21-40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T. Jr. , McCrae, R.R. , Zonderman, A.B. , Barbano, H.E. , Lebowitz, B. , Larson, D.M. (1986). Cross-sectional studies of personality in a national sample: 2. Stability in Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness. Psychology and Aging, 1, 144– 149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ebert, S.A. , Tucker, D.C. , Roth, D.L. (2002). Psychological resistance factors as predictors of general health status and physical symptom reporting. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 7, 363– 375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erikson, M. , Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 460– 466. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429– 456. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Kivimäki, M. , Rantala, A. , Tolvanen, A. (2004). Sense of coherence and work characteristics: A cross-lagged structural equation model among managers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 323– 342. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Leskinen, E. , Kinnunen, U. (2005). Structural invariance and stability of sense of coherence: A longitudinal analysis of two groups with different employment experiences. Work & Stress, 19, 68– 83. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Leskinen, E. , Kinnunen, U. , Mauno, S. (2000). Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 239– 257. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Leskinen, E. , Kinnunen, U. , Ruoppila, I. (2003). The stability of sense of coherence. Comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1151– 1165. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Lintula, H. , Suominen, S. , Koskenvuo, M. , Vahtera, J. , Kivimäki, M. (2007). Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Quality of Life Research, 16, 483– 493. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Mäkikangas, A. , Aunola, K. (2006). Sense of coherence and optimism: A more positive approach to health. In L. Pulkkinen, J., Kaprio, & R.J., Rose (Eds.), Socioemotional development and health from adolescence to adulthood (pp. 286-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feldt, T. , Rasku, A. (1998). The structure of Antonovsky's Orientation to Life Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 505– 516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frommberger, U. , Stieglitz, R-D. , Straub, S. , Nyberg, E. , Schlickewei, W. , Kuner, E. et al., (1999). The concept of sense of coherence and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder in traffic accident victims. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 343– 348. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hakanen, J. , Feldt, T. , Leskinen, E. (2007). Change and stability of sense of coherence in adulthood: Longitudinal evidence from the Healthy Child Study. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 602– 617. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S.E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307– 324. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. , Sörbom, K. (1996). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide . Chicago: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. , Sörbom, D. , du Toit, S. , du Toit, M. (1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features . Chicago: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kivimäki, M. , Feldt, T. , Vahtera, J. , Nurmi, J.-E. (2000). Sense of coherence and health: Evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 583– 597. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T.O. , Cunningham, W.A. , Shakar, G. , Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151– 173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. , Costa, P.T., Jr. (1990). Personality in adulthood . New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. , Costa, P.T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed. pp. 139-153). Guilford: New York. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. , John, O.P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175– 215. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mlonzi, E.N. , Strümpfer, D.J., W. (1998). Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and 16PF second-order factors. Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 39– 50. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mäkikangas, A. , Kinnunen, U. , Feldt, T. (2004). Self-esteem, dispositional optimism, and health: Evidence from cross-lagged data on employees. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 556– 575. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pulkkinen, L. (1982). Self-control and continuity from childhood to adolescence. In B.P. Baltes & O.G. Brim, Jr., (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 63-105). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pulkkinen, L. (1998). Levels of longitudinal data differing in complexity and the study of continuity in personality characteristics. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 161-184). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pulkkinen, L. , Fyrsten, S. , Kinnunen, U. , Kinnunen, M-L. , Pitkänen, T. , Kokko, K. (2003). 40+: Erään ikäluokan selviytymistarina [40+: A story of the resilience of an age cohort group]. Reports from the Department of Psychology University of Jyväskylä, 349. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pulver, A. , Allik, J. , Pulkkinen, L. , Hämäläinen, M. (1995). A Big Five personality inventory in two non-Indo-European languages. European Journal of Personality, 9, 109– 124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, B.W. , DelVecchio, W.F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3– 25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruiselova', Z. (2000). Salutogenic approach in the context of the Big Five factors. Studia Psychologica, 42, 157– 161. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ruiselova', Z. (2002). Relationships between resistance to load and personality traits in elderly women. Studia Psychologica, 44, 227– 233. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schnyner, U. , Buchi, S. , Sensky, T. , Klaghofer, R. (2000). Antonovsky's sense of coherence: Trait or state?. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69, 296– 302. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smits, C.H.M. , Deeg, D.J.H. , Bosscher, R.J. (1995). Well-being and control in older persons: The prediction of well-being from control measures. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40, 237– 251. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Srivastava, S. , John, O.P. , Gosling, S.D. , Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041– 1053. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173– 180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strumpfer, D.J.W. , Gouws, J.F. , Viviers, M., R. (1998). Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale related to negative and positive affectivity. European Journal of Personality, 12, 457– 480. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar