Sense of Coherence and Five-Factor Approach to Personality
Conceptual Relationships
Abstract
Abstract. In the present study we analyzed the conceptual relationship of sense of coherence (SOC) to the five-factor model of personality (FFM; i.e., Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness). Participants (109 men, 114 women) were drawn from the ongoing Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality and Social Development (JYLS); which was started when the participants were 8 or 9-years old (in 1968): Data gathered at age 42 were used in this study. SOC was measured by the 13-item Orientation to Life Questionnaire (Antonovsky, 1987) and FFM personality traits with the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, 1989). The results obtained from structural equation modeling (SEM) indicated that a high SOC was strongly associated with Neuroticism (-.85). In addition, SOC showed modest positive associations with Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness. On the basis of the present results, it seems reasonable to assume that SOC and reversed Neuroticism (i.e., emotional stability) are closely related constructs at the conceptual, theoretical, and empirical levels.
References
1997). Using personality variables to predict cancer and heart disease. European Journal of Personality, 11, 319– 342.
(1979). Health, stress, and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
(1991). The structural sources of salutogenic strengths. In C.L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Personality and stress: Individual differences on the stress process (pp. 67-104). Chichester: Wiley.
(1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 725– 733.
(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238– 246.
(1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588– 606.
(2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 5– 18.
(1999). Sex differences in the Big Five personality factors: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 801– 813.
(1996). Neuroticism and sense of coherence. Psychological Reports, 9, 343– 349.
(1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T.F. Heatherton & J.L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21-40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(1986). Cross-sectional studies of personality in a national sample: 2. Stability in Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness. Psychology and Aging, 1, 144– 149.
(2002). Psychological resistance factors as predictors of general health status and physical symptom reporting. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 7, 363– 375.
(2005). Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 460– 466.
(1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429– 456.
(2004). Sense of coherence and work characteristics: A cross-lagged structural equation model among managers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 323– 342.
(2005). Structural invariance and stability of sense of coherence: A longitudinal analysis of two groups with different employment experiences. Work & Stress, 19, 68– 83.
(2000). Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of stability of sense of coherence. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 239– 257.
(2003). The stability of sense of coherence. Comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1151– 1165.
(2007). Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Quality of Life Research, 16, 483– 493.
(2006). Sense of coherence and optimism: A more positive approach to health. In L. Pulkkinen, J., Kaprio, & R.J., Rose (Eds.), Socioemotional development and health from adolescence to adulthood (pp. 286-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1998). The structure of Antonovsky's Orientation to Life Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 505– 516.
(1999). The concept of sense of coherence and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder in traffic accident victims. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 343– 348.
(2007). Change and stability of sense of coherence in adulthood: Longitudinal evidence from the Healthy Child Study. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 602– 617.
(2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307– 324.
(1996). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide . Chicago: Scientific Software International.
(1999). LISREL 8: New statistical features . Chicago: Scientific Software International.
(2000). Sense of coherence and health: Evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 583– 597.
(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151– 173.
(1990). Personality in adulthood . New York: Guilford.
(1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed. pp. 139-153). Guilford: New York.
(1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175– 215.
(1998). Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and 16PF second-order factors. Social Behavior and Personality, 26, 39– 50.
(2004). Self-esteem, dispositional optimism, and health: Evidence from cross-lagged data on employees. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 556– 575.
(1982). Self-control and continuity from childhood to adolescence. In B.P. Baltes & O.G. Brim, Jr., (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 63-105). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
(1998). Levels of longitudinal data differing in complexity and the study of continuity in personality characteristics. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 161-184). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
(2003). 40+: Erään ikäluokan selviytymistarina [40+: A story of the resilience of an age cohort group]. Reports from the Department of Psychology University of Jyväskylä, 349. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
(1995). A Big Five personality inventory in two non-Indo-European languages. European Journal of Personality, 9, 109– 124.
(2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3– 25.
(2000). Salutogenic approach in the context of the Big Five factors. Studia Psychologica, 42, 157– 161.
(2002). Relationships between resistance to load and personality traits in elderly women. Studia Psychologica, 44, 227– 233.
(2000). Antonovsky's sense of coherence: Trait or state?. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 69, 296– 302.
(1995). Well-being and control in older persons: The prediction of well-being from control measures. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40, 237– 251.
(2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041– 1053.
(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173– 180.
(1998). Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale related to negative and positive affectivity. European Journal of Personality, 12, 457– 480.
(