Skip to main content
Original Articles

Metacognition

Defining Its Facets and Levels of Functioning in Relation to Self-Regulation and Co-regulation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277

Research in the field of metacognition, a multifaceted phenomenon, is in the main fragmented without much theoretical integration of the findings related to its various facets. Moreover, metacognition is usually conceived of as an individual and conscious process that serves the regulation of cognition. However, there is growing evidence that metacognition also functions at a nonconscious level, is involved in the co-regulation of cognition in collaborative settings, and interacts with affect in the self-regulation of behavior. Based on these considerations, a multifaceted and multilevel model of metacognition is proposed that broadens Nelson and Naren’s conceptualization of metacognition. The implications for theory and measurement of metacognition as well as for interventions involving metacognition are explored.

References

  • Annevirta, T. , Vauras, M. (2001). Metacognitive knowledge in primary grades: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2, 257–282. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bartsch, K. , Wellman, H.M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, A.L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert, R. Kluwe, (Eds.), Classroom management (pp. 144–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J.R. , Donelan-McCall, N. , Dunn, J. (1996). Why talk about mental states? The significance of children’s conversations with friends, siblings and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1105–1122. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bush, G. , Luu, P. , Posner, M.I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in the anterior cingulate gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215–222. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C.S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241–261. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C.S. , Scheier, M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooper, M.J. , Grocutt, E. , Deepak, K. , Bailey, E. (2007). Metacognition in anorexia nervosa and nondieting controls: A preliminary investigation. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 113–117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dermitzaki, I. , Kiosseoglou, G. (2004). Self-regulation during problem solving in second-graders: Relations with students’ performance and goal orientation. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 128–146. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, R.M. Sorrentino, (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. (2002a). Feelings as subjective evaluations of cognitive processing: How reliable are they? Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 9, 163–184. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. (2002b). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences: Feelings, judgments, and their interrelations. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, P.-J. Marescaux, (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 19–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. , Dina, F. (2007). Is mastery orientation always beneficial for learning? In F. Salili, R. Hoosain, (Eds.), Culture, motivation and learning: A multicultural perspective (pp. 131–167). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. , Kourkoulou, A. , Mitsiou, F. , Ziliaskopoulou, D. (2006). Effort regulation, effort perceptions, mood, and metacognitive experiences: What determines the estimate of effort expenditure? Metacognition and Learning, 1, 33–49. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. , Petkaki, C. (2005). Effects of mood on students’ metacognitive experiences. Learning and Instruction, 15, 415–431. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. , Samara, A. , Petropoulou, M. (1999). Feeling of difficulty: An aspect of monitoring that influences control. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 461–476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Efklides, A. , Tsiora, A. (2002). Metacognitive experiences, self-concept, and self-regulation. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 45, 222–236. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erber, R. (1996). The self-regulation of moods. In L.L. Martin, A. Tesser, (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation (pp. 251–275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fabricius, W.V. , Schwanenflugel, P.J. (1994). The older child’s theory of mind. In A. Demetriou, A. Efklides, (Eds.), Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development (pp. 111–132). Amsterdam: Elsevier. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernandez-Duque, D. , Baird, J.A. , Posner, M.I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 288–307. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foote, A.L. , Crystal, J.D. (2007). Metacognition in the rat. Current Biology, 17, 551–556. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, P.L. (1989). Children and emotion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Iiskala, T. , Vauras, M. , Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 147–178. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, A. (1998). Transactive peer tutoring: Distributing cognition and metacognition. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 57–74. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kitchener, K.S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P.D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch,, E. Thompson, (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koriat, A. , Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one’s own knowledge. In S. Chaiken, Y. Trope, (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483–502). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kruger, J. , Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetencies lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 121–134. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhl, J. (2001). A functional approach to motivation: The role of goal enactment and self-regulation in current research on approach and avoidance. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, R.M. Sorrentino, (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 239–268). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhl, J. , Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The Volitional Component Inventory. In J. Heckhausen, C.S. Dweck, (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across life span (pp. 15–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kuhn, D. (2000). Theory of mind, metacognition, and reasoning: A life-span perspective. In P. Mitchell, K.J. Riggs, (Eds.), Children’s reasoning and the mind (pp. 301–326). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuyper, H. , van der Werf, M.P.C. , Lubbers, M.J. (2000). Motivation, meta-cognition and self-regulation as predictors of long-term educational attainment. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 6, 181–205. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lockl, K. , Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the mind: Links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development, 78, 148–167. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lories, G. , Dardenne, B. , Yzerbyt, V.Y. (1998). From social cognition to metacognition. In V.Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, B. Dardenne, (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 1–15). London: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, L.L. , Stapel, D.A. (1998). Correction and metacognition: Are people naive dogmatists or naive empiricists during social judgments? In V.Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, B. Dardenne, (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 228–247). London: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Metallidou, P. , Efklides, A. (2000). Metacognitive aspects of the self, cognitive ability, and affect: Their interplay and specificity. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 7, 369–385. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Metallidou, P. , Efklides, A. (2001). The effects of general success-related beliefs and specific metacognitive experiences on causal attributions. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, R.M. Sorrentino, (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 325–347). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Metcalfe, J. (1994). A computational modeling approach to novelty monitoring, metacognition, and frontal lobe dysfunction. In J. Metcalfe, A.P. Shimamura, (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 137–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, T.O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, T.O. , Kruglanski, A.W. , Jost, J.T. (1998). Knowing thyself and others: Progress in metacognitive social psychology. In V.Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, B. Dardenne, (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 69–89). London: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nelson, T.O. , Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe, A. Shimamura, (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paris, S.G. (2002). When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, P.-J. Marescaux, (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 105–120). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petrides, M. (1995). Functional organization of the human frontal cortex for mnemonic processing: Evidence from neuroimaging studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769, 85–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Posner, M.I. (2005). Genes and experience shape brain networks of conscious control. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 173–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Premack, D. , Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reder, L.M. , Schunn, C.D. (1996). Metacognition does not apply: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L.M. Reder, (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, E. (1983). Metacognitive development. In S. Meadows, (Ed.), Developing thinking: Approaches to children’s cognitive development (pp. 106–141). London: Methuen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ruffman, T. , Slade, L. , Crowe, E. (2002). The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 734–751. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salonen, P. , Vauras, M. , Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction: What can it tell us about metacognition and co-regulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10, 199–208. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W. , Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between 2 and 20. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schraw, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition: Implications of the Buros symposium. In J.C. Impara, (Series Ed.), G. Schraw, J.C. Impara, (Vol. Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 297–321). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. , Clore, G.L. (2003). Mood as information. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296–303. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shimamura, A.P. (1994). The neuropsychology of metacognition. In J. Metcalfe, A.P. Shimamura, (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shimamura, A.P. (2000). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 313–323. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stuss, D.T. , Benson, D.F. (1986). The frontal lobes (2nd ed.). New York: Raven. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Veen, V. , Carter, C.S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring process in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593–602. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M.V.J. , Elshout, J.J. (1999). Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 509–523. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vogeley, K. , Kurthen, M. , Falkai, P. , Maier, W. (1999). Essential functions of the human self model are implemented in the prefrontal cortex. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 343–363. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whittlesea, B.W.A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V.Y. , Dardenne, B. , Leyens, J.-P. (1998). Social judgeability concerns in impression formation. In V.Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, B. Dardenne, (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 126–156). London: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar