The Role of Public Trust During Pandemics
Implications for Crisis Communication
Abstract
The present review examined the importance of trust when preparing for and during a pandemic. The reviewed literature suggests that trust in health agencies positively influenced people’s willingness to adopt recommended behavior. Most of these studies are atheoretical, and due to the lack of a common framework for trust and its antecedents, finding commonalities among the studies may seem difficult. The trust, confidence, and cooperation model was used to uncover the commonalities among the various studies on trust. This framework suggests that a distinction between values and past performance may be helpful to better understand the impact of trust on risk perception and behavior. Based on the reviewed literature, the following five recommendations relevant for crisis communication during pandemics were identified: A diverse set of experts should be used as communicators, medical personnel need to model the recommended behavior, a transparent information strategy should be used, the focus should be not only on trust but also on confidence, and establishing trust in health authorities before a pandemic occurs is important. Furthermore, research gaps were identified that should be addressed to better understand the role of trust when dealing with pandemics.
References
(2011). Pandemic influenza A/H1N1 vaccination uptake among health care workers in Qatar: Motivators and barriers. Vaccine, 29, 2206–2211. doi: 10.1016/J.Vaccine.2010.08.093
(2012). What lies behind the low rates of vaccinations among nurses who treat infants? Vaccine, 30, 3151–3154.
(2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 125–130. doi: 10.1207/S15324796abm2702_7
(2010). Who is that masked person: The use of face masks on Mexico city public transportation during the Influenza A (H1N1) outbreak. Health Policy, 95, 50–56.
(2002). New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Analysis, 22, 359–367.
(2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206–219.
(2005). The Singaporean response to the SARS outbreak: Knowledge sufficiency versus public trust. Health Promotion International, 20, 320–326. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dai010
(2010). Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30, 541–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x
(1997). Culture, cosmopolitanism, and risk management. Risk Analysis, 17, 55–65.
(2006). Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 383–416.
(2007). Trust, risk perception and the TCC model of cooperation. In , Trust in cooperative risk management. Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind (pp. 1–49). London, UK: Earthscan.
(2002). Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2423–2433.
(2011). Surveillance of perceptions, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of the Italian adult population (18–69 years) during the 2009–2010 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic. European Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 211–219.
(2010). Competence in dealing with uncertainty: Lessons to learn from the influenza pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 53, 1283–1289. doi: 10.1007/S00103-010-1165-1
(2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.
(1995). Risk perception and communicating unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15, 137–145.
(2011). Community under stress: Trust, reciprocity, and community collective efficacy during SARS outbreak. Journal of Community Health, 36, 797–810. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9378-2
(2003). Trust, transparency, and social context: Implications for social amplification of risk. In , The social amplification of risk (pp. 123–137). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2004). The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters, 149, 391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.049
(1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01094.x
(2009). Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: Overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychology, 28, 210–216.
(2011). Trust in medical organizations predicts pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination behavior and perceived efficacy of protection measures in the Swiss public. European Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 203–210. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9577-2
(1998). Trust in government. In , Trust and governance (pp. 9–27). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
(2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261–2262.
(2010). Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 463, 296–297.
(2010). Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 501–516.
(1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
(2012). H1N1 preventive health behaviors in a university setting. Journal of American College Health, 60, 46–56. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.570398
(2009). Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy. Medical Decision Making, 29, 483–490.
(2010). Situational awareness and health protective responses to pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional study. Plos One, 5, e13350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013350
(2011). The influence of social-cognitive factors on personal hygiene practices to protect against influenzas: Using modelling to compare Avian A/H5N1 and 2009 pandemic A/H1N1 influenzas in Hong Kong. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 93–104. doi: 10.1007/s12529-010-9123-8
(1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551–578.
(1989). Vertrauen – Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität
[Trust – a mechanism for reducing social complexity] Vol. 3, Stuttgart, Germany: Enke.(2009). The role of similarity cues in the development of trust in sources of information about GM food. Risk Analysis, 29, 1116–1128.
(1999). Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into conceptual quagrime. In , Social trust and the management of risk (pp. 100–116). London, UK: Earthscan.
(1963). Psychologie: Die Entwicklung ihrer Grundannahmen seit der Einführung des Experiments
[Psychology: The development of its basic assumptions since the introduction of experiments] . Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff.(2010). Public trust in government concerning tobacco control in Japan. Risk Analysis, 30, 143–152.
(1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17, 43–54.
(1991). Biases in the assimilation to technological breakdowns: Do accidents make us safer? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1058–1082.
(2011). Some factors affecting the decision on non-mandatory vaccination in an influenza pandemic: Comparison of pandemic (H1n1) and seasonal influenza vaccination. Zdravstveno Varstvo, 50, 227–238.
(2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23, 961–972. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00373
(2004). Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Analysis, 24, 1475–1486.
(2011a). Compliance with recommendations for pandemic influenza H1N1 2009: The role of trust and personal beliefs. Health Education Research, 26, 761–769. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr035
(2011b). A Social-Cognitive model of pandemic influenza H1N1 risk perception and recommended behaviors in Italy. Risk Analysis, 31, 645–656. doi: 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2010.01529.X
(2012). Factors influencing pandemic influenza vaccination of healthcare workers – A systematic review. Vaccine, 30, 4733–4743.
(2009). Public willingness to take a vaccine or drug under emergency use authorization during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-Biodefense Strategy Practice and Science, 7, 275–290. doi: 10.1089/bsp. 2009.0041
(1991). Credibility and trust in risk communication. In , Communicating risks to the public (pp. 175–218). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
(1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
(2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.
(2012). Examining the knowledge, attitudes and practices of domestic and international university students towards seasonal and pandemic influenza. BMC Public Health, 12, 307. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-307
(2012). Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Risk Analysis, 32, 1394–1403.
(2008). Biased confidence in risk assessment studies. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 14, 1226–1234.
(2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 713–719.
(2001). Better negative than positive? Evidence of a bias for negative information about possible health dangers. Risk Analysis, 21, 211–218.
(2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353–362.
(2003). Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis, 23, 705–716. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00349
(2007). Trust in cooperative risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind. London, UK: Earthscan.
(1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131–142.
(1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675–682.
(1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19, 689–701. (Reprinted from Environment, ethics, and behavior, pp. 277-313, 1997).
(2008). Trust in motives, trust in competence: Separate factors determining the effectiveness of risk communication. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 111–120.
(2011). Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands. Bmc Public Health, 11, 575. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-575
(2011). Monitoring pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccination coverage in Germany 2009/10-Results from thirteen consecutive cross-sectional surveys. Vaccine, 29, 4008–4012. doi: 10.1016/J.Vaccine.2011.03.069
(2012). Risk perception and information-seeking behaviour during the 2009/10 influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in Germany. Eurosurveillance, 17, 9–16.
(2005). Information specificity and hazard risk potential as moderators of trust asymmetry. Risk Analysis, 25, 1187–1198.
(2006). Marginal trust in risk managers: Building and losing trust following decisions under uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 26, 1187–1203. doi: 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2006.00807.X
(2010). The Intuitive Detection Theorist (IDT) model of trust in hazard managers. Risk Analysis, 30, 1196–1209.
(2010). Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 breakthrough infections and estimates of vaccine effectiveness in Germany 2009–2010. Eurosurveillance, 15, 2–5.
(2012). Measuring people’s knowledge about vaccination: Developing a one-dimensional scale. Vaccine, 30, 3771–3777.
