Skip to main content
Special Section: Environmental Conservation

Bringing Environmental Psychology Into Action

Four Steps From Science to Policy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000174

Environmental psychology is by definition one of the main disciplines for individual behavioral change with regard to sustainability issues. However, it has not been as visible or successful as one could wish. We present a four-step process that describes the passage of knowledge from science to policy: Basic research generates pieces of reliable knowledge; transdisciplinary research includes the views and knowledge of the stakeholders that are concerned, and tests results in the field; dissemination brings results, tools, and techniques to the attention of the public; finally, policy creates structures that provide guiding behavioral contexts. The various frames of understanding in the sectors of basic and transdisciplinary science, the media, and policy making are discussed, as well as ways of addressing them. Some attention is brought to the embedding contexts that foster the generation of compatible and useful scientific results. We conclude with a discussion of the relation between scientists and societal actors with a focus on trustworthiness.

References

  • Alcamo, J. (Ed.). (2008). Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis, (Vol. 2). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, J.R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barnett, A. (2009, April 27). IHDP: Should 90% of climate change research be social science? Climate Feedback. Retrieved from blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2009/04/ihdp_should_90_of_climate_chan.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, J., Bazerman, M. H., Shonk, K. (2006). Enlarging the societal pie through wise legislation: A psychological perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 123–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00009.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S. (2011). The debunking handbook. St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., Molotch, H. L. (1983). Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 16–35. doi: 10.1086/268764 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crompton, T., Kasser, T. (2009). Meeting environmental challenges: The role of human identity. Godalming, UK: WWF-UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M. (2004). Right about others, wrong about ourselves? Actual and perceived self-other differences in resistance to persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 585–603. doi: 10.1348/0144666042565416 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ernst, A. (2008). Zwischen Risikowahrnehmung und Komplexität. Über die Schwierigkeiten und Möglichkeiten kompetenten Handelns im Umweltbereich [Between risk perception and complexity. On the difficulties of and options for competent action in the environmental field]. In I. Bormann, G. de Haan (Eds.), Kompetenzen der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Operationalisierung, Messung, Rahmenbedingungen, Befunde. (pp. 45–59). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ernst, A. (2010). Social simulation: A method to investigate environmental change from a social science perspective. In M. Gross, H. Heinrichs (Eds.), Environmental Sociology: European perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges (pp. 109–122). Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ernst, A. (2014). Using spatially explicit marketing data to build social simulations. In A. Smajgl, O. Barreteau (Eds.), Empirical agent-based modelling – challenges and solutions (pp. 85–104). Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feldman, D. L., Ingram, H. M. (2009). Making science useful to decision makers: Climate forecasts, water management, and knowledge networks. Weather, Climate, and Society, 1, 9–21. doi: 10.1175/2009WCAS1007.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frost, K., Frank, E., Maibach, E. (1997). Relative risk in the news media: A quantification of misrepresentation. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 842–845. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.5.842 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Garvin, T. (2001). Analytical paradigms: The epistemological distances between scientists, policy makers, and the public. Risk Analysis, 21, 443–456. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.213124 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology and sustainable development: Expansion, maturation, and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 199–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00503.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gutscher, H., Keller, C., Mosler, H.-J. (2000). Roads as new common pool resources, speed reduction as a public good – Two case studies in organizing large-scale collective action. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gutscher, H., Mosler, H.-J., Artho, J. (2001). Voluntary collective action in neighbourhood slow-down – using communication and diffusion instruments. In R. Kaufmann-Hayoz, H. Gutscher (Eds.), Changing things – moving people (pp. 151–169). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, L. C. (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104, 231–242. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hering, J., Hoffmann, S., Meierhofer, R., Schmid, M., Peter, A.J. (2012). Assessing the societal benefits of applied research and expert consulting in water science and technology. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 21, 95–101. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Holzhauer, S., Krebs, F., Ernst, A. (2013). Considering baseline homophily when generating spatial social networks for agent‐based modelling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 19, 128–150. doi: 10.1007/s10588‐012‐9145‐7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Junger, M., Feder, L., Clay, J., Coté, S., Farrington, D. P., Freiberg, K., … Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Preventing violence in seven countries: Global convergence in policy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 327–356. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G. (2011). Verhaltensingenieurwissenschaft transferiert psychologische Erkentnisse in die Gesellschaft [Behavioral engineering transfers psychological knowledge into society]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 240–242. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Midden, C., Cervinka, R. (2008). Evidence for a data-based environmental policy: Induction of a behavior-based decision support system. Applied Psychology, 57, 151–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00291.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kepplinger, H. M. (2007). Reciprocal effects: Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 3–23. doi: 10.1177/1081180X07299798 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krebs, F., Holzhauer, S., Ernst, A. (2013). Modelling the role of neighbourhood support in regional climate change adaptation. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. doi: 10.1007/s12061-013-9085-8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Gignac, C. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing – therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewandowsky, S., Risbey, J. S., Smithson, M., Newell, B. R., Hunter, J. (2012). Scientific uncertainty and climate change: Part I. Uncertainty and unabated emissions. Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maasen, S., Lieven, O. (2006). Transdisciplinarity: A new mode of governing science? Science and Public Policy, 23, 399–410. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Leiserowitz, A. (2008). Communication and marketing as climate change – intervention assets: A public health perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 488–500. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Naustdalslid, J. (2011). Climate change – the challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18, 243–252. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2011.572303 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 12–23. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nisbet, M. C., Kotcher, J. E. (2009). A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication, 30, 328–354. doi: 10.1177/1075547008328797 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Birney, M. E. (2012). Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator’s motives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp. 2011.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Railsback, S., Grimm, V. (2011). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reid, W. V., Chen, D., Goldfarb, L., Hackmann, H., Lee, Y. T., Mokhele, K., … Whyte, A. (2010). Earth system science for global sustainability: Grand challenges. Science, 330, 916–917. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneidewind, U., Singer-Brodowski, M. (2013). Transformative Wissenschaft [Transformative science]. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scholz, R. W. (2011). Environmental literacy in science and society: From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholz, R. W., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Walter, A. I., Stauffacher, M. (2006). Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7, 226–251. doi: 10.1108/14676370610677829 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholz, R. W., Stauffacher, M. (2007). Managing transition in clusters: Area development negotiations as a tool for sustaining traditional industries in a Swiss prealpine region. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2518–2539. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholz, R. W., Stauffacher, M. (2009). Von einer Wissenschaft für die Gesellschaft zu einer Wissenschaft mit der Gesellschaft [From a science for society to a science with society]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 242–244. doi: 10.1026/0033-3042.60.4.242 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N., Ernst, A. (2009). Agent-based modelling of the diffusion of environmental innovations – An empirical approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 497–511. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Silbereisen, R. K. (2009). Politik braucht Forschung, aber welche? [Policy needs research, but what kind?]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 244–245. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Smajgl, A. (2010). Challenging beliefs through multi-level participatory modelling in Indonesia: Thematic issue – Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 1470–1476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soboll, A., Elbers, M., Barthel, R., Schmude, J., Ernst, A., Ziller, R. (2010). Integrated regional modelling and scenario development to evaluate future water demand under global change conditions. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16, 477–498. doi: 10.1007/s11027-010-9274-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spiel, C., Lösel, F., Wittmann, W. W. (2009). Transfer psychologischer Erkenntnisse – eine notwendige, jedoch schwierige Aufgabe [Transfer of psychological knowledge – a necessary but difficult task]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 257–258. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stauffacher, M., Walter, A. I., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Scholz, R. W. (2006). Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7, 252–275. doi: 10.1108/14676370610677838 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stokols, D. (1995). The paradox of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 50, 821–837. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.10.821 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 63–77. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Storch, H., Krauss, W. (2013). Die Klimafalle. Die gefährliche Nähe von Politik und Klimaforschung [The climate trap. The dangerous proximity of policy and climate research]. Munich, Germany: Hanser. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swim, J. K., Clayton, S., Howard, G. S. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change: Psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66, 251–264. doi: 10.1037/a0023472 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swim, J. K., Stern, P. C., Doherty, T. J., Clayton, S., Reser, J. P., Weber, E. U., … Howard, G. S. (2011). Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 241–250. doi: 10.1037/a0023220 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London, UK: Penguin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thøgersen, J., Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 141–163. doi: 10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walter, A. I., Helgenberger, S., Wiek, A., Scholz, R. W. (2007). Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: Design and application of an evaluation method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 325–338. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weber, E. U., Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315–328. doi: 10.1037/a0023253 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weichselgartner, J., Kasperson, R. (2010). Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 20, 266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weingart, P., Engels, A., Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 261–283. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wottawa, H. (2009). Bemerkungen zu aktuellen Problemen des Praxis-Transfers in die Wirtschaft [Comments on current problems of transferring practical knowledge into the economy]. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 251–252. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Zia, A., Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19, 743–761. doi: 10.1177/0963662509357871 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar