Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000062

We report on an investigation of the consequences of preventing the position effect from contributing to the correlation between two reasoning scales considered an indicator of convergent validity. Confirmatory factor models served to separate this effect from the ability-specific components of measurement in Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices and Horn’s Numeric Reasoning Scale. These models additionally enabled investigation of the convergent validity of these measures. In a sample of 230 participants the ability-specific components of the two reasoning measures showed a very high correlation (.88), whereas the correlation of the position-related components was not significant. Since the measures represented different types of reasoning, we conclude that the ability-specific components represent fluid intelligence and the position-related components reflect the specificities of the different types of reasoning.

References