Personality Correlates of the Self-Assessed Abilities to Tell and Detect Lies, Tell Truths, and Believe Others
Abstract
The contribution of personality dimensions (the Big Five) to self-assessed communication abilities to tell and detect lies, tell truths, and believe others was examined. One hundred seventy-four undergraduate students completed the Big Five personality inventory (BFI) and evaluated their relative lie-telling, truth-telling, lie-detection and their ability to believe other peoples’ truths. Results indicated that Extraversion predicted enhanced lie-telling, truth-telling, and lie-detection abilities. Openness to experience predicted higher ratings of lie-telling and lie-detecting abilities, indicating that for curious people with intellectual skills and attentiveness to inner feelings, lie-related abilities are important. Agreeableness predicted high ratings of believing skills and low ratings of the remaining three skills, indicating that well-tempered people tend to believe others. Conscientiousness and Neuroticism were negatively associated with telling lies persuasively. This was explained by the need of conscientious people to be honest and by the low self-confidence and negative emotions of people who scored high on Neuroticism. Implications of the present results were discussed.
References
2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 15, 6–11.
(1995). The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300–307. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.300
(2012). The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty. New York, NY: Harper-Collins.
(1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
(2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
(1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In J. A. DalyJ. M. WiemannEds., Strategic interpersonal communication. LEA’s communication series (pp. 191–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
(2013). Lying and team incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.011
(2011). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 261–282. doi: 10.1007/s11218-010-9145-8
(2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
(2008). Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 364–370.
(2013). Incremental variance in indecisiveness due to cognitive failure compared to fluid intelligence and personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 261–265. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.005
(1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913
(2003). Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 349–363. doi: 10.1002/acp.871
(2009). Lie detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons. Psychological Reports, 105, 1047–1056. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.F.1047-1056
(2011). Effects of feedback on self-assessed and actual abilities to tell lies. In A. E. HasselmEd., Crime: causes, types and victims (pp. 155–166). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
(2012). Lies, truths, and attachment orientations in late adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 670–673. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.018
(2011). Indecisiveness and big five personality factors: Relationship and specificity. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1023–1028. doi: 10.1002/per.786
(2010). Attachment, authenticity, and honesty: Dispositional and experimentally induced security can reduce self-and other-deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 841–855. doi: 10.1037/a0019206
(2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 643–659. doi: 10.1037/a0023589
(1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 5–21.
(1991). The Big Five inventory – Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
(1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1037–1051. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1037
(2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
(2009). Identifying the sources of self-esteem: The mixed medley of benevolence, merit, and bias. Self and Identity, 8, 176–195.
(1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
(2004). Facial appearance and impressions of credibility: The effects of facial babyishness and age on person perception. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 276–289. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000014
(1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
(2010). Gender differences in the nature and linkage of higher-order personality factors to trait and ability emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 617–622. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.019
(2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480. doi: 10.1023/A:1020278620751
(2006). What facets of openness and conscientiousness predict fluid intelligence score? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.003
(2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72, 355–378. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00265.x
(2010). Need for cognition and the process of lie detection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 961–971. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.002
(2013). It’s not what you are, it’s what you know: Experience, beliefs, and the detection of deception in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 467–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01011.x
(2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00198
(2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in big five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
(2014). Exploring own-age biases in deception detection. Cognition and Emotions, 28, 493–506. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.839438
(2006). The price of deceptive behavior: Disliking and lying to people who lie to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.02.003
(2011). The ease of lying. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 20, 908–911. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.10.023
(1996). “Wide-eyed” and “crooked-face”: Determinants of perceived and real honesty over the life span. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1258–1269. doi: 10.1177/01461672962212006
(