Skip to main content
Original Article

One- Through Six-Component Solutions from Ratings on Familiar English Personality-Descriptive Adjectives

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000176

We report solutions for one through six components for self-ratings (N = 559) on 449 familiar English personality-descriptive adjectives (see Lee & Ashton, 2008). The first unrotated component mainly contrasted desirable with undesirable characteristics. The varimax-rotated two-component solution contained dimensions closely resembling the Social Self-Regulation and Dynamism constructs of Saucier et al. (2014). The three-component solution contained dimensions closely resembling the Affiliation, Dynamism, and Order constructs of De Raad et al. (2014). In the four-component solution, an Emotional Stability dimension emerged, absorbing some variance from dimensions of the three-component solution. The five-component solution added an Intellect/Imagination/Unconventionality (Openness) component, and thus resembled the classic Big Five structure (e.g., Goldberg, 1990). In the six-component solution, the variance of the Big Five Agreeableness and Emotional Stability components was reorganized, producing components corresponding to HEXACO Agreeableness and to rotated variants of HEXACO Emotionality and Honesty-Humility. Solutions based on peer ratings (N = 303) were generally similar to those based on self-ratings, but showed a much larger first unrotated component.

References

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707–721. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R., & De Vries, R. E. (2009). Higher-order factors of personality: Do they exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boies, K., Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Pascal, S., & Nicol, A. A. M. (2001). The structure of the French personality lexicon. European Journal of Personality, 15, 277–295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Raad, B., Barelds, D., Timmerman, M., De Roover, K., Mlacic, B., & Church, A. T. (2014). Towards a pan-cultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycholexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlacic, B., Di Blas, L., … Katigbak, M. S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. SpielbergerJ. N. ButcherEds., Advances in personality assessment, Vol. 1, (pp. 203–234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: Derivations of Big-Five factor scores from each of six samples. Journal of Personality, 69, 709–743. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (2006). Doing it all bass-ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 347–358. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hahn, D.-W., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (1999). A factor analysis of familiar Korean personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 13, 261–282. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001–1053. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552–567. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saucier, G. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. Journal of Personality, 77, 1577–1614. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saucier, G. (2010). The structure of social effects: Personality as impact on others. European Journal of Personality, 24, 222–240. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., Payne, D. L., Carlson, R., Sanogo, L., Ole-Kotikash, L., … Zhou, X. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82, 1–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar