Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Is Maximizing a Bad Thing?

Linking Maximizing Tendency to Positive Outcomes Through Future-Oriented Thinking

Published Online:May 24, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000226

Abstract

Abstract. Maximizing Tendency is a decision style characterized by holding a higher standard for one’s decision. Initially, this style had been linked to negative life outcomes (e.g., decision regret, life dissatisfaction, depression), but recent studies have begun to show the opposite. In this study, we argue and test the proposition that relations between maximizing and future-oriented outcomes can be explained by future-oriented thinking. Results show that maximizers are more likely to consider the future consequences of their current actions. In turn, maximizers intend to save more, have more savings, show a greater concern for guiding the next generation, and are less likely to engage in temporal discounting behaviors. The study concludes that maximizing can be a beneficial decision style due, in part, to its impact on future-oriented thinking, and adds to a growing literature suggesting that maximizing can, in fact, be a good thing.

References

  • Agarwal, A., Tripathi, K. K. & Srivastava, M. (1983). Social roots and psychological implications of time perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 367–380. doi: 10.1080/00207598308247488 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bagozzi, R. P. & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45–87. doi: 10.1177/109442819800100104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron, R. A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effects of thinking about “what might have been”. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 79–91. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00024-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bartels, D. M. & Rips, L. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 49–69. doi: 10.1037/a0018062 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 303–316. doi: 10.1177/0049124189017003004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheek, N. N. & Schwartz, B. (2016). On the meaning and measurement of maximization. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 126–146. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dalal, D. K., Diab, D. L., Zhu, X. & Hwang, T. (2015). Understanding the construct of maximizing tendency: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 437–450. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Diab, D. L., Gillespie, M. A. & Highhouse, S. E. (2008). Are maximizers really unhappy? The measurement of maximizing tendency. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 364–370. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M. T., Ballard, K., Samanze-Larkin, G. R. & Kutson, B. (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 280–286. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Giacopelli, N. M., Simpson, K. M., Dalal, R. S., Randolph, K. L. & Holland, S. J. (2013). Maximizing as a predictor of job satisfaction and performance: A tale of three scales. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 448–469. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hardisty, D. J. & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 329–340. doi: 10.1037/a0016433 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hofer, J., Busch, H., Chasiotis, A., Kärtner, J. & Campos, D. (2008). Concern for generativity and its relation to implicit pro-social power motivation, generative goals, and satisfaction with life: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Personality, 76, 1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00478.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horstmanshof, L. & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718. doi: 10.1348/000709906X160778 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Howlett, E., Kees, J. & Kemp, E. (2008). The role of self-regulation, future orientation, and financial knowledge in long-term financial decisions. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42, 223–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2008.00106.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lanaj, K., Chang, C. H. & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 998–1034. doi: 10.1037/a0027723 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landis, R. S., Beal, D. J. & Tesluk, P. E. (2000). A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186–207. doi: 10.1177/109442810032003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • LeBreton, J. M., Wu, J. & Bing, M. N. (2009). The truth(s) on testing for mediation in the social and organizational sciences. In C. E. LanceR. J. VandenbergEds., Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 109–144). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K. & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. doi: 10.1037/a0033266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marshall, M. A. & Brown, J. D. (2004). Expectations and realizations: The role of expectancies in achievement settings. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 347–361. doi: 10.1007/s11031-004-2388-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mathieu, J. E. & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1031–1056. doi: 10.1002/job.406 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McAdams, D. P. & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Metcalfe, J. & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of Willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Parker, A. M., Bruine de Bruin, W. & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 342–350. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115. doi: 10.1037/a0022658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K. & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E. & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Singh, R. & Greenhaus, J. H. (2004). The relation between career decision-making strategies and person-job fit: A study of job changers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 198–221. doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00034-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232. doi: 10.1177/1094428105284955 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 411–419. doi: 10.1080/10705519809540115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S. & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015. doi: 10.1177/0013164497057006009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weinhardt, J. M., Morse, B. J., Chimeli, J. & Fisher, M. (2012). An item response theory and factor analytic examination of two prominent maximizing tendency scales. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 644–658. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weston, R. & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. doi: 10.1177/0011000006286345 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wood, L. N. & Highhouse, S. (2014). Do self-reported decision styles relate with others’ impressions of decision quality? Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.036 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A. & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar