Abstract
The current study used a naming task to investigate whether strategic control could modulate the process of attentional capture that is driven by working memory. The use of a naming task to engage working memory eliminates potential strategic perceptual resampling, which may have played a role in several previous studies. After naming a prime, participants performed a selection task in which they judged the direction of a moving target in each trial. Prime validity, which is the probability that the primes are identical to the selection targets, was manipulated across four experiments. The results showed that reaction times to the motion judgment were faster in the valid condition than in the invalid condition when the prime validity was 50% (Experiment 1A). These results occurred even in the presence of a highly informative spatial cue that predicted the target’s location (Experiment 4). A larger capturing effect was observed when the validity was 70% (Experiments 2 and 3). When the prime validity was lower than the chance level (0% in Experiment 1B; 15% in Experiments 2 and 3), a validity effect was not observed. Thus, the results suggest that there is a strong tendency for working memory to capture attention by default when there is no reason to avoid the influence of primes. When there is a reason to avoid the influence, strategic control modulates the attentional capture that is driven by working memory.
References
(2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.
(2011). Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. Acta Psychologica, 137, 217–225.
(2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
. (1994). Corel DRAW! [Computer software]. Ottawa, Canada: Corel Inc.
(1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 353, 1245–1255.
(1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
(2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467–473.
(2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11, 689–703.
(2009). Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1292–1302.
(2006). The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 426–442.
(2005). An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4593–4604.
(2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1275–1291.
(2006). Feature-based working memory driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243–1265.
(2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248–261.
(2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 342–348.
(2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 730–737.
(2009). Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: Evidence for top-down attentional capture. Experimental Psychology, 56, 165–172.
(2006a). Dividing the mind: The necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1282–1289.
(2006b). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46, 1010–1018.
(2007). Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17186–17191.
(2010). Working memory enhances visual perception: Evidence from signal detection analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 441–456.
(2007). The role of spatial and non-spatial information in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1335–1351.
(2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 363–376.
(2010). Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 565–579.
