Abstract
Stochastic diffusion models (Ratcliff, 1978) can be used to analyze response time data from binary decision tasks. They provide detailed information about cognitive processes underlying the performance in such tasks. Most importantly, different parameters are estimated from the response time distributions of correct responses and errors that map (1) the speed of information uptake, (2) the amount of information used to make a decision, (3) possible decision biases, and (4) the duration of nondecisional processes. Although this kind of model can be applied to many experimental paradigms and provides much more insight than the analysis of mean response times can, it is still rarely used in cognitive psychology. In the present paper, we provide comprehensive information on the theory of the diffusion model, as well as on practical issues that have to be considered for implementing the model.
References
2010). The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neurosciences, 33, 10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002
(2012). A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 70–82. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0128-6
(2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002
(2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review, 51, 661–703. doi: 10.1137/070710111
(2009). The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 297–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.07.003
(2010). Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: Evidence from reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 484–499. doi: 10.1037/a0018435
(1986). Tests for the normal distribution. In , Goodness-of-fit techniques. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
(2011). Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: Different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 61–69. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0022-4
(2011). Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice: A diffusion model account. Experimental Psychology, 58, 434–442. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000111
(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
(2013). A diffusion model account of masked vs. unmasked priming: Are they qualitatively diferent?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0032333
(2009). On the mean and variance of response times under the diffusion model with an application to parameter estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 55–68.
(1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273, 1699–1702. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5282.1699
(2011). What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 65, 69–75. doi: 10.1037/a0022808
(2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117, 759–784. doi: 10.1037/a0019471
(2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368.
(2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial introduction with R and BUGS. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
(2012). A comparison of two diffusion process models in accounting for payoff and stimulus frequency manipulations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1366–1382. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0321-0
(2011). What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 651–687.
(2000). WinBUGS. A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325–337.
(2012). Aging and IQ effects on associative recognition and priming in item recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 416–437. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.001
(2012). Bias in the brain: A diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 2335–2343. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4156-11.2012
(1965). A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7, 308–313.
(2009). Putting it all together: A unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. Psychological Review, 116, 207–219. doi: 10.1037/a0014259
(1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
(2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 278–291. doi: 10.3758/bf03196283
(2008). Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: Response signal and response time data. Psychology and Aging, 23, 900–916. doi: 10.1037/a0013930
(2013). Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model. Psychological Review, 120, 281–292. doi: 10.1037/a0030775
(2004). A Diffusion Model account of the Lexical Decision Task. Psychological Review, 111, 159–182.
(2011). Inhibition in superior colliculus neurons in a brightness discrimination task?. Neural Computation, 23, 1790–1820. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00135
(2007). Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 1756–1774. doi: 10.1152/jn.00393.2006
(2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922.
(2004). A diffusion model account of normal and impaired readers. Brain and Cognition, 55, 374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.051
(1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
(2010). Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: The temporal relation between perceptual encoding and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 70–94. doi: 10.1037/a0018128
(2000). Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 1–25.
(2004). A Diffusion Model analysis of the effects of aging in the Lexical-Decision Task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 278–289.
(2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and Aging, 16, 323–341.
(2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 523–535. doi: 10.3758/bf03194580
(2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 408–424.
(2006). Aging and individual differences in rapid two-choice decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 626–635. doi: 10.3758/bf03193973
(2010). Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127–157.
(2011). Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 464–487. doi: 10.1037/a0023810
(2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaching to dealing with contaminant reaction and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 438–481.
(1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261–300.
(2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.
(2012). Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 222–250. doi: 10.1037/a0026003
(2006). A Diffusion Model analysis of adult age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 101–117.
(2011). Motivational incentives modulate age differences in visual perception. Psychology and Aging, 26, 932–939. doi: 10.1037/a0023297
(2008). Aging and emotional memory: Cognitive mechanisms underlying the positivity effect. Psychology and Aging, 23, 859–872.
(2012). Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: An analysis of the strength-based mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1137–1151. doi: 10.1037/a0028151
(2012). The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: The evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1189–1199. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0225-1
(1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
(2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 18, 415–429.
(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Weasley.
(2009). How to use the diffusion model: Parameter recovery of three methods: Ez, fast-dm, and DMAT . Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 463–473. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp. 2009.09.004
(2007a). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011–1026. doi: 10.3758/bf03193087
(2007b). Fitting the Rateliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1011.
(2008). Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: A DMAT primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 61–72.
(2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16, 44–62. doi: 10.1037/a0021765
(2008). Interpreting ambiguous stimuli: Separating perceptual and judgmental biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1048–1056.
(2013). Cognitive processes in associative and categorical priming: A Diffusion Model analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 536–559. doi: 10.1037/a0029459
(2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1206–1220.
(2007). Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 767–775.
(2008). A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 1–9.
(2010). Separating response tendency and decision biases: Arguments for an additional parameter in Ratcliff’s diffusion model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 539–555.
(2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 641–671.
(2008). EZ does it! Extensions of the EZ-diffusion model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1229–1235. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1229
(2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 3–22. doi: 10.3758/BF03194023
(2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631.
(2011). Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 210–238. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001
(2009). Dysphoria and memory for emotional material: A diffusion-model analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 181–205.
(2010). Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 39–52.
(2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In , Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2012). Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 53–79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177
(2013). Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 140–158. doi: 10.1037/a0028520
(2011). Specifying theories of developmental dyslexia: A diffusion model analysis of word recognition. Developmental Science, 14, 1340–1354. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01091.x
(