When You Have to Climb Downhill to Reach the Top
The Effect of Action Versus State Orientation on Solving a Goal-Subgoal Conflict in the Tower of Hanoi Task
Abstract
Complex problems often include a response conflict between a subgoal and a final goal. The present experiment investigated the roles of situational demands and individual differences in self-regulation on solving goal-subgoal conflicts in a computerized Tower of Hanoi task. Action-oriented versus state-oriented individuals were randomly assigned to a demanding condition in which they deliberated about a personal decision problem, or to a nondemanding control condition. In line with expectations state-oriented individuals had greater difficulties to solve goal-subgoal conflicts in the demanding compared to the nondemanding condition. Action-oriented individuals performed well in both conditions. In line with Personality Systems Interactions theory (Kuhl, 2000) the findings show that complex problem solving depends on how well people are able to deal with situational demands.
References
(2005). Affect regulation and motive-incongruent achievement goals: Antecedents of subjective well-being and symptom formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781–799.
(2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In A. W. KruglanskiE. T. HigginsEds., Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). (pp. 516–539). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2010). Deconstructing the tower: Parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task. Brain and Cognition, 72, 472–482.
(2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. MonsellJ. DriverEds., Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 713–737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2004). Deconstructing the Tower of London: Alternative moves and conflict resolution as predictors of task performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1459–1483.
(1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2000). Action-state orientation: Construct validity of a revised measure and its relationship to work-related variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 250–263.
(2009). The iso-effect: Is there specific learning of Tower of London iso-problems? Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 237–249.
(2012). What is automatic self-regulation? Journal of Psychology, 222, 147–156.
(1998). Maintaining a healthy diet: Effects of personality and self-reward versus self-punishment on commitment to and enactment of self-chosen and assigned goals. Psychology & Health, 13, 651–686.
(2012). An induced emotional stressor differentially decreases subjective sleep quality in state-oriented but not in action-oriented individuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 1007–1011.
(1995). Are the frontal lobes implicated in “planning” functions? Interpreting data from the Tower of Hanoi. Neuropsychologia, 33, 623–642.
(1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531–542.
(1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.
(2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711–723.
(2000). The strategic control of gaze direction in the Tower of London task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 894–907.
(2006). On the waxing and waning of working memory: Action orientation moderates the impact of demanding relationship primes on working memory capacity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1716–1728.
(2007). On the regulation of cognitive control: Action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in Stroop interference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 593–609.
(2010). Dealing with demands: The role of action versus state orientation. In R. HoyleEd., Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 332–352). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
(1986). Problem solving: A cognitive approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2011). Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: A software tool for analyzing tower tasks. Behavioural Brain Research, 216, 1–8.
(2004). The impact of problem structure on planning: Insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 462–472.
(2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.
(2008). Individual differences in intention initiation under demanding conditions: Interactive effects of state vs action orientation and enactment difficulty. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 693–715.
(2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and social demand on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 974–990.
(2012). Do demanding conditions help or hurt self-regulation? Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 6, 328–346.
(1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. MaherEd., Progress in experimental personality research, Vol. 13, (pp. 99–171). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In J. KuhlJ. BeckmannEds., Volition and personality (pp. 47–59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
(2000). The volitional basis of personality systems interactions theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–703.
(1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
(1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382–399.
(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
(1997). The effect of goal-subgoal conflict on planning ability after frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions in humans. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1147–1157.
(1975). The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 268–288.
(1994). Choice of decision-making strategies and action versus state orientation. In J. KuhlJ. BeckmannEds., Volition and personality (pp. 167–176). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
