The Flip Side of the Auditory Spatial Selection Benefit
Larger Attentional Mixing Costs for Target Selection by Ear Than by Gender in Auditory Task Switching
Abstract
In cued auditory task switching, one of two dichotically presented number words, spoken by a female and a male, had to be judged according to its numerical magnitude. One experimental group selected targets by speaker gender and another group by ear of presentation. In mixed-task blocks, the target-defining feature (male/female vs. left/right) was cued prior to each trial, but in pure blocks it remained constant. Compared to selection by gender, selection by ear led to better performance in pure blocks than in mixed blocks, resulting in larger “global” mixing costs for ear-based selection. Selection by ear also led to larger “local” switch costs in mixed blocks, but this finding was partially mediated by differential cue-repetition benefits. Together, the data suggest that requirements of attention shifting diminish the auditory spatial selection benefit.
References
(2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39, 713–726.
(1958). Perception and communication. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
(2004). Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: Effects of masker uncertainty. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 301–310. doi: 10.1121/1.1628683.
(2011). Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the Inverse Efficiency Score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean Reaction Time (RT) and the Percentage of Errors (PE)? Psychologica Belgica, 51, 5–13.
(1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979. doi: 10.1121/1.1907229.
(2014). The temporal cascade of neural processes underlying target detection and attentional processing during auditory search. Cerebral Cortex. Online first publication. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu047.
(2011). Fifty years of dichotic listening research – Still going and going and …. Brain and Cognition, 76, 211–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.006.
(2013). A review of the role of cue processing in task switching. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 5–14. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000125.
(2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3804–3815. doi: 10.1121/1.2109187.
(2010). Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849–874. doi: 10.1037/a0019842.
(2010). Benefits of knowing who, where, and when in multi-talker listening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 2498–2508. doi: 10.1121/1.3327507.
(2014). Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 73–80. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0571-5.
(2011). Switching in the cocktail party – Exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1140–1147. doi: 10.1037/a0022189.
(2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research, 69, 252–261. doi: 10.1007/s00426-004-0180-y.
(2000). Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15, 126–147. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.1.126.
(2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880–913. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.880.
(2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004.
(2014). Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: Exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2010–2024. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.898079.
(2014). Dissociable effects of auditory attention switching and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 78, 379–386. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0545-9.
(2005). The time it takes to switch attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 647–653. doi: 10.3758/BF03196753.
(2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.575.
(2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393.
(1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145–188. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00050-X.
(2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96–109. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.96.
(2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7.
(1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2009). Dissociating restart costs and mixing costs in task switching. Psychological Research, 73, 407–416. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0151-9.
(2012). The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: Theory and empirical support. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 540–552. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0251-2.
(2008). Effect of voice characteristics on the attended and unattended processing of two concurrent messages. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 967–993. doi: 10.1080/09541440701686201.
(2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477–1491. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1477.
(2008). Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003.
(1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282–299. doi: 10.1037/h0027242.
(2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601–626. doi: 10.1037/a0019791.
(1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 243–262. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.3.243.
(2001). Location and frequency cues in auditory selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 65–74. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.65.
