Search for Capacity-Limited and Super-Capacity Search
Abstract
Abstract. The present study investigated capacity limitations of visual search. In a series of experiments, participants searched for a singleton target among homogenous distractors, a conjunction target defined by combination of two features, or a feature target among heterogeneous distractors. Using the simultaneous-sequential paradigm, I found that singleton search proceeded in a capacity-unlimited manner. By contrast, the performance of the conjunction search was found to depend on a capacity-limited process. For feature searches, the performance of searching for a specific color was not affected by how the stimuli were presented, while the orientation search performance was enhanced as the number of distractors simultaneously presented with the target increased. These results imply that distinct colors are individually coded, whereas multiple orientations are encoded as an ensemble in a structured way. Taken together, the present study clarifies which type of search process are capacity-limited and reveals how this limit can be overcome.
References
(2009). Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA, 106, 7345–7350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808981106
(2010). Visual feature binding requires reentry. Psychological Science, 21, 200–204. doi: 10.1177/0956797609357858
(2005). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 13. doi: 10.3758/BF03195009
(1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272–300.
(1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
(2000). A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 425–451. doi: 10.3758/BF03212096
(1989). Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. Psychological Review, 96, 267–314.
(1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 356–378. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.356
(2016). Your own face is no more precious than others’: Evidence from the simultaneous-sequential paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 187–192. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0880-x
(2015a). Color is processed less efficiently than orientation in change detection but more efficiently in visual search. Psychological Science, 26, 646–652. doi: 10.1177/0956797615569577
(2015b). Visual features for perception, attention, and working memory: Toward a three-factor framework. Cognition, 145, 43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.08.007
(2005). Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search. Cognition, 94, B101–B111. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.006
(2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114, 599–631. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.599
(2007). Characterizing the limits of human visual awareness. Science, 317, 823–825. doi: 10.1126/science.1143515
(2012). Does precision decrease with set size? Journal of Vision, 12, 10. doi: 10.1167/12.6.10
(2013). Independence is elusive: Set size effects on encoding precision in visual search. Journal of Vision, 13. doi: 10.1167/13.5.8
(1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1517–1539. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1517
(1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703–1721.
(1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 108–130.
(2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
(2011). Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 813–833. doi: 10.1037/a0021440
(2013). Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes. Journal of Vision, 13, 18. doi: 10.1167/13.2.18
(1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321–359.
(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
(2001). Visual search and attention: A signal detection theory approach. Neuron, 31, 523–535.
(1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 34–49.
(1998). Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution. Nature, 396, 72–75. doi: 10.1038/23936
(1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293–306.
