Skip to main content
Registered Report

The Effect of Cognitive Control on Different Types of Auditory Distraction

A Preregistered Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000372

Abstract. Deviant as well as changing auditory distractors interfere with short-term memory. According to the duplex model of auditory distraction, the deviation effect is caused by a shift of attention while the changing-state effect is due to obligatory order processing. This theory predicts that foreknowledge should reduce the deviation effect, but should have no effect on the changing-state effect. We compared the effect of foreknowledge on the two phenomena directly within the same experiment. In a pilot study, specific foreknowledge was impotent in reducing either the changing-state effect or the deviation effect, but it reduced disruption by sentential speech, suggesting that the effects of foreknowledge on auditory distraction may increase with the complexity of the stimulus material. Given the unexpected nature of this finding, we tested whether the same finding would be obtained in (a) a direct preregistered replication in Germany and (b) an additional replication with translated stimulus materials in Sweden.

References

  • Bell, R., Dentale, S., Buchner, A. & Mayr, S. (2010). ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect. Psychophysiology, 47, 1182–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01029.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bell, R., Röer, J. P., Dentale, S. & Buchner, A. (2012). Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1542–1557. doi: 10.1037/a0028459 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, T., Beaman, C. P. & Berry, D. C. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10, 199–214. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000335 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Colle, H. A. & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 17–31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371%2876%2990003-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. London, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195119107.001.0001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellermeier, W. & Hellbrück, J. (1998). Is level irrelevant in “irrelevant speech?” Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1406–1414. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1406 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ellermeier, W. & Zimmer, K. (1997). Individual differences in susceptibility to the “irrelevant speech effect”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2191–2199. doi: 10.1121/1.419596 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Ellermeier, W. & Zimmer, K. (2014). The psychoacoustics of the irrelevant sound effect. Acoustical Science and Technology, 35, 10–16. doi: 10.1250/ast.35.10 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elliott, E. M., Hughes, R. W., Briganti, A., Joseph, T. N., Marsh, J. E. & Macken, B. (2016). Distraction in verbal short-term memory: Insights from developmental differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Gelman, A. & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60, 328–331. doi: 10.1198/000313006X152649 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greve, W., Bröder, A. & Erdfelder, E. (2013). Result-blind peer reviews and editorial decisions: A missing pillar of scientific culture. European Psychologist, 18, 286–294. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000144 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Horváth, J. & Bendixen, A. (2012). Preventing distraction by probabilistic cueing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 342–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.019 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes, R. W. (2014). Auditory distraction: A duplex-mechanism account. PsyCH Journal, 3, 30–41. doi: 10.1002/pchj.44 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F. & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 539–553. doi: 10.1037/a0029064 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F. & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F. & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1050 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. M. & Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 103–133. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.103 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J. & Mosdell, N. A. (1997). The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 549–564. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02657.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. M., Miles, C. & Page, J. (1990). Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 89–108. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kolers, P. A. & Roediger, H. L. III (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371%2884%2990282-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lange, E. (2005). Disruption of attention by irrelevant stimuli in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 513–531. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • LeCompte, D. C. (1995). An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 391–397. doi: 10.3758/BF03210978 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, J. E. & Jones, D. M. (2010). Cross-modal distraction by background speech: What role for meaning? Noise & Health, 12, 210–216. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70499 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, J. E., Röer, J., Bell, R. & Buchner, A. (2014). Predictability and distraction: Does the neural model represent post-categorical features? PsyCH Journal, 3, 58–71. doi: 10.1002/pchj.50 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Morris, N. & Jones, D. M. (1990). Habituation to irrelevant speech: Effects on a visual short-term memory task. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 291–297. doi: 10.3758/BF03205003 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Nairne, J. S. (2007). Roddy Roediger’s memory. In J. S. NairneEd., The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger, III (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nöstl, A., Marsh, J. E. & Sörqvist, P. (2012). Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events. PLoS One, 7, e48569. doi: 0.1371/journal.pone.0048569 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Pelletier, M.-F., Hodgetts, H., Lafleur, M. F., Vincent, A. & Tremblay, S. (2016). Vulnerability to the irrelevant sound effect in adult ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20, 306–316. doi: 10.1177/1087054713492563 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Röer, J. P., Bell, R. & Buchner, A. (2014a). Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant sound effect on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 42, 609–621. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0381-y First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Röer, J. P., Bell, R. & Buchner, A. (2014b). What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations. PLoS One, 9, e84166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084166 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Röer, J. P., Bell, R. & Buchner, A. (2015). Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 692–702. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000028 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Dentale, S. & Buchner, A. (2011). The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 39, 839–850. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0070-z First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Röer, J. P., Bell, R., Marsh, J. E. & Buchner, A. (2015). Age equivalence in auditory distraction by changing and deviant speech sounds. Psychology and Aging, 30, 849–855. doi: 10.1037/pag0000055 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Röer, J. P., Körner, U., Buchner, A. & Bell, R. (in press). Semantic priming by irrelevant speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1186-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlittmeier, S. J., Weißgerber, T., Kerber, S., Fastl, H. & Hellbrück, J. (2012). Algorithmic modeling of the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) by the hearing sensation fluctuation strength. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 194–203. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0230-7 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Shelton, J. T., Elliott, E. M., Eaves, S. D. & Exner, A. L. (2009). The distracting effects of a ringing cell phone: An investigation of the laboratory and the classroom setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 513–521. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.001 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80. doi: 10.1177/1745691613514755 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Sörqvist, P. (2010). High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: Further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Memory & Cognition, 38, 651–658. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.5.651 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Sussman, E., Winkler, I. & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 630–637. doi: 10.3758/BF03196525 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Vachon, F., Hughes, R. W. & Jones, D. M. (2012). Broken expectations: Violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 164–177. doi: 10.1037/a0025054 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar