Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Registered Report

Top-Down Modulation of Motor Priming by Belief About Animacy

A Registered Replication Report

Published Online:April 11, 2024https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000605

Abstract

Abstract: Research has shown that people automatically imitate others and that this tendency is stronger when the other person is a human compared with a nonhuman agent. However, a controversial question is whether automatic imitation is also modulated by whether people believe the other person is a human. Although early research supported this hypothesis, not all studies reached the same conclusion and a recent meta-analysis found that there is currently neither evidence in favor nor against an influence of animacy beliefs on automatic imitation. One of the most prominent studies supporting such an influence is the study by Liepelt and Brass (2010), who found that automatic imitation was stronger when participants believed an ambiguous, gloved hand to be human, as opposed to wooden. In this registered report, we provide a high-powered replication of this study (N = 199). In contrast to Liepelt and Brass (2010), we did not find an effect of animacy beliefs on automatic imitation. However, we did find a correlation between automatic imitation and perceived self-other similarity. Together, these results suggest that the gloved hand procedure does not reliably influence automatic imitation, but interindividual differences in perceived similarity do.

References

  • Anderson, S. F., Kelley, K., & Maxwell, S. E. (2017). Sample-size planning for more accurate statistical power: A method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1547–1562. 10.1177/0956797617723724 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Bird, G., Leighton, J., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 274(1628), 3027–3031. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1019 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1–2), Article 1–2. 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., Prinz, W., Wohlschläger, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124–143. 10.1006/brcg.2000.1225 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 489–495. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Brass, M., & Muhle-Karbe, P. S. (2014). More than associations: An ideomotor perspective on mirror neurons. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(2), 195–196. 10.1017/S0140525X13002239 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Carr, E. W., Bird, G., Catmur, C., & Winkielman, P. (2021). Dissociable effects of averted “gaze” on the priming of bodily representations and motor actions. Acta Psychologica, 212, Article 03225. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103225 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Caspers, S., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2010). ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1148–1167. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Catmur, C., & Heyes, C. (2011). Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 409–421. 10.1037/a0019325 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cook, R., Bird, G., Catmur, C., Press, C., & Heyes, C. (2014). Mirror neurons: From origin to function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(02), 177–192. 10.1017/S0140525X13000903 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., De Coster, L., Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E., & Brass, M. (2018). Automatic Imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(5), 453–500. 10.1037/bul0000143 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cracco, E., & Brass, M. (2019). Reaction time indices of automatic imitation measure imitative response tendencies. Consciousness and Cognition, 68, 115–118. 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.001 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cracco, E., Genschow, O., & Baess, P. (2022). Top-down social modulation of perception-action coupling. Acta Psychologica, 222, Article 103481. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103481 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cracco, E., Genschow, O., Radkova, I., & Brass, M. (2018). Automatic imitation of pro- and antisocial gestures: Is implicit social behavior censored? Cognition, 170C, 179–189. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.019 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cracco, E., Liepelt, R., Brass, M., & Genschow, O. (2024, February 4). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy: A Registered Replication Report [Data, Materials]. https://osf.io/v2wyu First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 81. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Farmer, H., Carr, E. W., Svartdal, M., Winkielman, P., & De Hamilton, A. F. C. (2016). Status and power do not modulate automatic imitation of intransitive hand movements. PLoS ONE, 11(4), Article 4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0151835 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Genschow, O., Cracco, E., Verbeke, P., Westfal, M., & Crusius, J. (2021). A direct test of the similarity assumption—Focusing on differences as compared with similarities decreases automatic imitation. Cognition, 215, Article 104824. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104824 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2017). Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(38), 10071–10076. 10.1073/pnas.1701916114 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Genschow, O., Van Den Bossche, S., Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Rigoni, D., Brass, M., Van Den Bossche, S., Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Rigoni, D., & Brass, M. (2017). Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated. PLoS ONE, 12(9), 1–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183784 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Cracco, E., & Crusius, J. (2022). Group membership does not modulate automatic imitation. Psychological Research, 86(3), 780–791. 10.1007/s00426-021-01526-1 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gowen, E., Bolton, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2016). Believe it or not: Moving non-biological stimuli believed to have human origin can be represented as human movement. Cognition, 146, 431–438. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.010 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gowen, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2012). How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 76(4), 407–420. 10.1007/s00426-011-0389-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 463–483. 10.1037/a0022288 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Hortensius, R., & Cross, E. S. (2018). From automata to animate beings: The scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents: Socialness attribution and artificial agents. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1426(1), 93–110. 10.1111/nyas.13727 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Klapper, A., Ramsey, R., Wigboldus, D., & Cross, E. S. (2014). The Control of automatic imitation based on bottom-up and top-down cues to animacy: Insights from brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 2503–2513. 10.1162/jocn_a_00651 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. 10.1177/2515245918770963 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Liepelt, R., & Brass, M. (2010). Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 221–227. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000028 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Liepelt, R., Prinz, W., & Brass, M. (2010). When do we simulate non-human agents? Dissociating communicative and non-communicative actions. Cognition, 115(3), 426–434. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Liepelt, R., Von Cramon, D. Y., Brass, M., Cramon, D. Y. V., & Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 578–591. 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Longo, M. R., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2009). Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors. Experimental Brain Research, 192(4), 739–744. 10.1007/s00221-008-1649-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Nevejans, M., & Cracco, E. (2022). Model expertise does not influence automatic imitation. Experimental Brain Research, 240(4), 1267–1277. 10.1007/s00221-022-06338-2 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article aac4716. 10.1126/science.aac4716 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Papadatou-Pastou, M., Ntolka, E., Schmitz, J., Martin, M., Munafò, M. R., Ocklenburg, S., & Paracchini, S. (2020). Human handedness: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(6), 481–524. 10.1037/bul0000229 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Press, C. (2011). Action observation and robotic agents: Learning and anthropomorphism. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(6), 1410–1418. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., & Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 632–640. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.020 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Press, C., Gillmeister, H., & Heyes, C. (2006). Bottom-up, not top-down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(8), 2415–2419. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05115.x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ramsey, R. (2018). What are reaction time indices of automatic imitation measuring? Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 240–254. 10.17605/OSF.IO/N8XVQ First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(4), 264–274. 10.1038/nrn2805 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. 10.18637/jss.v048.i02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Souter, L. D., Braem, S., Genschow, O., Brass, M., & Cracco, E. (2021). Social group membership does not modulate automatic imitation in a contrastive multi-agent paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(4), 746–759. 10.1177/1747021820986528 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Sparks, S., Sidari, M., Lyons, M., & Kritikos, A. (2016). Pictures of you: Dot stimuli cause motor contagion in presence of a still human form. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 135–145. 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 915–926. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. 10.1177/1745691616658637 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Stel, M., van Dijk, E., & van Baaren, R. B. (2016). When and why mimicry is facilitated and attenuated: Mimicry. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 561–574. 10.1111/spc3.12269 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Teufel, C., Fletcher, P. C., & Davis, G. (2010). Seeing other minds: Attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 376–382. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.005 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wang, Y., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2012). Social top-down response modulation (STORM): A model of the control of mimicry in social interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 153. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00153 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, Y., Newport, R., & Hamilton, A. F. D. C. (2011). Eye contact enhances mimicry of intransitive hand movements. Biology Letters, 7(1), Article 1. 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0279 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar