Skip to main content
Original Article

Liking a Sexual Character Affects Willingness to Have Casual Sex

The Moderating Role of Relationship Status and Status Satisfaction

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000145

Abstract. The aim of the present study was to investigate individual differences in the influence of the likability of a sexual female main character on women’s willingness to have casual sex with a stranger. Specifically, we studied the moderating role of relationship status (Experiments 1 and 2) and satisfaction with one’s relationship or with being single (Experiment 2). Women (aged 18–30), who were single or in a relationship, watched an erotic scene with a likable or unlikable sexual female main character who had casual sex. In both experiments, women in a relationship were less willing to have casual sex than single women, after they had seen a likable sexual female character. However, an unpredicted effect was found in Experiment 2. After seeing an unlikable sexual female character, women who were dissatisfied with their relationship or with being single were more willing to have casual sex than their satisfied counterparts.

References

  • Allen, M., Emmers-Sommer, T. M., D’Alessio, D., Timmerman, L., Hanzal, A. & Korus, J. (2007). The connection between the physiological and psychological reactions to sexually explicit materials: A literature summary using meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 74, 541–560. doi: 10.1080/03637750701578648 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Attwood, F. (2005). What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the consumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media. Sexuality & Culture, 9, 65–86. doi: 10.1007/s12119-005-1008-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2001a). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265–299. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2001b). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/1467-839X.00024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Environmental sustainability by sociocognitive deceleration of population growth. In P. SchmuckW. SchultzEds., The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 209–238). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A., Chen, M. & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Belsky, J. & Pensky, E. (1988). Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage & Family Review, 12, 133–156. doi: 10.1300/J002v12n03_08 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berscheid, E. & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. GilbertS. T. FiskeG. LindzeyEds., Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: NYU Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boot, I., Peter, J. & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2014). Impersonal sex orientation and multitasking influence the effect of sexual media content on involvement with a sexual character. Media Psychology, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.742358 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J. D. & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 95–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CBS, Statistics Netherlands. (2009). Relatie en gezin aan het begin van de 21ste eeuw [Relationship and family at the beginning of the 21st century]. Den Haag: OBT bv. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • England, P. & Thomas, R. J. (2007). The decline of the date and the rise of the college hook up. In A. S. SkolnikJ. H. SkolnikEds., Family in transition (pp. 151–162). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eyal, K. & Finnerty, K. (2009). The portrayal of consequences of sexual intercourse on television: How, who, and with what consequences? Mass Communication & Society, 12, 143–169. doi: 10.1080/15205430802136713 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eyal, K. & Kunkel, D. (2008). The effects of television drama shows on emerging adults’ sexual attitudes and moral judgments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 161–181. doi: 10.1080/08838150801991757 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finnerty-Myers, K. (2011). Understanding the dynamics behind the relationship between exposure to negative consequences of risky sex on entertainment television and emerging adults’ safe-sex attitudes and intentions. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 743–764. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.540057 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Forgas, J. P. & Laham, S. (2009). Halo effects. In R. BaumeisterK. D. VohsEds., Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 499–502). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feldman, S. S., Turner, R. A. & Araujo, K. (1999). Interpersonal context as an influence on sexual timetables of youths: Gender and ethnic effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 25–52. doi: 10.1207/s15327795jra0901_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan, A. E., Stock, M. L. & Pomery, E. A. (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F. & Gerrard, M. (1995). Predicting young-adults health risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 505–517. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.505 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F., Gerrard, M., Blanton, H. & Russell, D. (1998). Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1164–1180. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1164 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbons, F. X., Pomery, E. A., Gerrard, M., Sargent, J. D., Weng, C. Y., Wills, T. A., … Stoolmiller, M. (2010). Media as social influence: Racial differences in the effects of peers and media on adolescent alcohol cognitions and consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 649–659. doi: 10.1037/a0020768 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfried, J. A., Vaala, S. E., Bleakley, A., Hennessy, M. & Jordan, A. (2013). Does the effect of exposure to TV sex on adolescent sexual behavior vary by genre? Communication Research, 40, 73–95. doi: 10.1177/0093650211415399 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P. & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552324 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Impett, E. A. & Peplau, L. A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552169 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kalish, R. & Kimmel, M. (2011). Hooking up. Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 137–151. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2011.546333 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kistler, M. E. & Lee, M. J. (2010). Does exposure to sexual hip-hop music videos influence the sexual attitudes of college students? Mass Communication and Society, 13, 67–86. doi: 10.1080/15205430902865336 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kunkel, D., Eyal, K., Donnerstein, E., Farrar, K. M., Biely, E. & Rideout, V. (2007). Sexual socialization messages on entertainment television: Comparing content trends 1997–2002. Media Psychology, 9, 595–622. doi: 10.1080/15213260701283210 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laan, E., Everaerd, W., van Bellen, G. & Hanewald, G. (1994). Women’s sexual and emotional responses to male-and female-produced erotica. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 153–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01542096 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laan, E. & Janssen, E. (2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. The Psychophysiology of Sex, 278–290. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~kinres/chapters/Laan_Janssen.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Littleton, H. L., Axsom, D. & Yoder, M. (2006). Priming of consensual and nonconsensual sexual scripts: An experimental test of the role of scripts in rape attributions. Sex Roles, 54, 557–563. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9017-z First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malamuth, N. & Huppin, M. (2005). Pornography and teenagers: The importance of individual differences. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 16, 315–326. doi: 10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moyer-Gusé, E., Chung, A. H. & Jain, P. (2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61, 387–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nabi, R. L. & Clark, S. (2008). Exploring the limits of social cognitive theory: Why negatively reinforced behaviors on TV may be modeled anyway. Journal of Communication, 58, 407–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00392.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paul, E. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In C. KirkpatrickS. DuckM. K. FoleyEds., Relating difficulty: The processes of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 141–160). New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paul, E. L., McManus, B. & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813373 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, M. E., Gibbons, F. X., Kingsbury, J. H. & Gerrard, M. (2013). Not intending but somewhat willing: The influence of visual primes on risky sex decisions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 553–565. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12055 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schützwohl, A., Fuchs, A., McKibbin, W. F. & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). How willing are you to accept sexual requests from slightly unattractive to exceptionally attractive imagined requestors? Human Nature, 20, 282–293. doi: 10.1007/s12110-009-9067-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapiro, A. F., Gottman, J. M. & Carrère, S. (2000). The baby and the marriage: Identifying factors that buffer against decline in marital satisfaction after the first baby arrives. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 59–70. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.59 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shulman, S., Walsh, S., Weisman, O. & Schelyer, M. (2009). Romantic contexts, sexual behavior, and depressive symptoms among adolescent males and females. Sex Roles, 61, 850–863. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9691-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P. & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sprecher, S. & Cate, R. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. H. HarveyA. WenzelS. SprecherEds., The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stone-Romero, E. F. & Rosopa, P. J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 326–352. doi: 10.1177/1094428107300342 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, L. D. (2013). Male partner selectivity, romantic confidence, and media depictions of partner scarcity. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 36–49. Retrieved from http://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00013-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, L. M. & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ward, L. & Rivadeneyra, R. (1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249. doi: 10.1080/00224499909551994 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whisman, M. A., Gordon, K. C. & Chatav, Y. (2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 320–324. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.320 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiederman, M. W. & Hurd, C. (1999). Extradyadic involvement during dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 265–274. doi: 10.1177/0265407599162008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilt, J., Condon, D. M. & Revelle, W. (2011). Telemetrics and online data collection: Collecting data at a distance. In T. LittleN. CardB. LaursenEds., Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 163–180). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar