Liking a Sexual Character Affects Willingness to Have Casual Sex
The Moderating Role of Relationship Status and Status Satisfaction
Abstract
Abstract. The aim of the present study was to investigate individual differences in the influence of the likability of a sexual female main character on women’s willingness to have casual sex with a stranger. Specifically, we studied the moderating role of relationship status (Experiments 1 and 2) and satisfaction with one’s relationship or with being single (Experiment 2). Women (aged 18–30), who were single or in a relationship, watched an erotic scene with a likable or unlikable sexual female main character who had casual sex. In both experiments, women in a relationship were less willing to have casual sex than single women, after they had seen a likable sexual female character. However, an unpredicted effect was found in Experiment 2. After seeing an unlikable sexual female character, women who were dissatisfied with their relationship or with being single were more willing to have casual sex than their satisfied counterparts.
References
2007). The connection between the physiological and psychological reactions to sexually explicit materials: A literature summary using meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 74, 541–560. doi: 10.1080/03637750701578648
(2005). What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the consumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media. Sexuality & Culture, 9, 65–86. doi: 10.1007/s12119-005-1008-7
(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
(2001a). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3, 265–299. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
(2001b). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/1467-839X.00024
(2002).
(Environmental sustainability by sociocognitive deceleration of population growth . In P. SchmuckW. SchultzEds., The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 209–238). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230
(1988). Marital change across the transition to parenthood. Marriage & Family Review, 12, 133–156. doi: 10.1300/J002v12n03_08
(1998).
(Attraction and close relationships . In D. T. GilbertS. T. FiskeG. LindzeyEds., Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: NYU Press.
(2014). Impersonal sex orientation and multitasking influence the effect of sexual media content on involvement with a sexual character. Media Psychology, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.742358
(2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 95–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x
(2009). Relatie en gezin aan het begin van de 21ste eeuw
. ([Relationship and family at the beginning of the 21st century] . Den Haag: OBT bv.2007).
(The decline of the date and the rise of the college hook up . In A. S. SkolnikJ. H. SkolnikEds., Family in transition (pp. 151–162). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.2009). The portrayal of consequences of sexual intercourse on television: How, who, and with what consequences? Mass Communication & Society, 12, 143–169. doi: 10.1080/15205430802136713
(2008). The effects of television drama shows on emerging adults’ sexual attitudes and moral judgments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52, 161–181. doi: 10.1080/08838150801991757
(2011). Understanding the dynamics behind the relationship between exposure to negative consequences of risky sex on entertainment television and emerging adults’ safe-sex attitudes and intentions. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 743–764. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.540057
(2009).
(Halo effects . In R. BaumeisterK. D. VohsEds., Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 499–502). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.1999). Interpersonal context as an influence on sexual timetables of youths: Gender and ethnic effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 25–52. doi: 10.1207/s15327795jra0901_2
(2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2007.10.001
(1995). Predicting young-adults health risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 505–517. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.505
(1998). Reasoned action and social reaction: Willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1164–1180. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1164
(2010). Media as social influence: Racial differences in the effects of peers and media on adolescent alcohol cognitions and consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 649–659. doi: 10.1037/a0020768
(2013). Does the effect of exposure to TV sex on adolescent sexual behavior vary by genre? Communication Research, 40, 73–95. doi: 10.1177/0093650211415399
(2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552324
(2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552169
(2011). Hooking up. Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 137–151. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2011.546333
(2010). Does exposure to sexual hip-hop music videos influence the sexual attitudes of college students? Mass Communication and Society, 13, 67–86. doi: 10.1080/15205430902865336
(2007). Sexual socialization messages on entertainment television: Comparing content trends 1997–2002. Media Psychology, 9, 595–622. doi: 10.1080/15213260701283210
(1994). Women’s sexual and emotional responses to male-and female-produced erotica. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 153–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01542096
(2007). How do men and women feel? Determinants of subjective experience of sexual arousal. The Psychophysiology of Sex, 278–290. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~kinres/chapters/Laan_Janssen.pdf
(2006). Priming of consensual and nonconsensual sexual scripts: An experimental test of the role of scripts in rape attributions. Sex Roles, 54, 557–563. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9017-z
(2005). Pornography and teenagers: The importance of individual differences. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 16, 315–326. doi: 10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.004
(2011). Identification with characters and discussion of taboo topics after exposure to an entertainment narrative about sexual health. Journal of Communication, 61, 387–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01551.x
(2008). Exploring the limits of social cognitive theory: Why negatively reinforced behaviors on TV may be modeled anyway. Journal of Communication, 58, 407–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00392.x
(2006).
(Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience . In C. KirkpatrickS. DuckM. K. FoleyEds., Relating difficulty: The processes of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 141–160). New York: Routledge.2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813373
(2013). Not intending but somewhat willing: The influence of visual primes on risky sex decisions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 553–565. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12055
(2009). How willing are you to accept sexual requests from slightly unattractive to exceptionally attractive imagined requestors? Human Nature, 20, 282–293. doi: 10.1007/s12110-009-9067-3
(2000). The baby and the marriage: Identifying factors that buffer against decline in marital satisfaction after the first baby arrives. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 59–70. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.59
(2009). Romantic contexts, sexual behavior, and depressive symptoms among adolescent males and females. Sex Roles, 61, 850–863. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9691-8
(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
(2004).
(Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability . In J. H. HarveyA. WenzelS. SprecherEds., The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 326–352. doi: 10.1177/1094428107300342
(2013). Male partner selectivity, romantic confidence, and media depictions of partner scarcity. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 36–49. Retrieved from http://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads
(2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00013-3
(2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.x
(1999). Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 237–249. doi: 10.1080/00224499909551994
(2007). Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 320–324. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.320
(1999). Extradyadic involvement during dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 265–274. doi: 10.1177/0265407599162008
(2011).
(Telemetrics and online data collection: Collecting data at a distance . In T. LittleN. CardB. LaursenEds., Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 163–180). New York: Guilford Press.