Serious Efforts at Bias Reduction
The Effects of Digital Games and Avatar Customization on Three Cognitive Biases
Abstract
Abstract. As research on serious games continues to grow, we investigate the efficacy of digital games to train enhanced decision making through understanding cognitive biases. This study investigates the ability of a 30-minute digital game as compared with a 30-minute video to teach people how to recognize and mitigate three cognitive biases: fundamental attribution error, confirmation bias, and bias blind spot. We investigate the effects of character customization on learning outcomes as compared with an assigned character. We use interviews to understand the qualitative differences between the conditions. Experimental results suggest that the game was more effective at teaching and mitigating cognitive biases than was the training video. Although interviews suggest players liked avatar customization, results of the experiment indicate that avatar customization had no significant effect on learning outcomes. This research provides information future designers can use to choose the best medium and affordances for the most effective learning outcomes on cognitive processes.
References
(2005). Learning by doing: A comprehensive guide to simulations computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
(1994). Blooms taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Ninety-third yearbook of the Chicago National Society for the Study of Education. Part II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(2006). Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach. Information Systems Journal, 16, 55–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00208
(2009). How avatar customizability affects children’s arousal and subjective presence during junk food-sponsored online video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 277–283. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0292
(2008). Coming of age in Second Life: An anthropologist explores the virtual human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. London, UK: Longmans.
(2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4, 7–24.
(1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
(2004). Confirmation bias in complex analyses (MITRE Technical Report MTR 04B0000017). Bedford, MA: MITRE Retrieved from http://www.mitre.org/publications/technical-papers/confirmation-bias-in-complex-analyses
(2008). Human factors of the confirmation bias on intelligence analysis: Decision support from graphical evidence landscapes. Human Factors, 50, 745–754.
(2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15–28.
(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Springer.
(2008). A new look at selective-exposure effects: An integrative model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 384–389. doi: 10.1177/0963721410391246
(1982).
Debiasing . In D. KahnemanP. SlovicA. TverskyEds., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422–444). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(1996). On seeing oneself as less self-serving than others: The ultimate self-serving bias? Teaching of Psychology, 23, 107–109. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2302_9
(2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy? New York. NY: Palgrave/St. Martin’s.
(2000). Countering the anchoring and adjustment bias with decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 29, 195–206. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00074-9
(2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317
(1984). Mind and media: The effects of television video games, and computers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2013). Disfluency disrupts the confirmation bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 178–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.010
(1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
(2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishers.
(2005). Meaningful learning with digital and online videos: Theoretical perspectives. AACE Journal, 13, 233–250.
(2004). Literature review in games and learning. Bristol, UK: NESTA Futurelab.
(2009). The video game experience as ‘true’ identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication Theory, 19, 351–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01347.x
(2003). Media psychology “is not yet there”: Introducing theories on media entertainment to the presence debate. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 246–259. doi: 10.1162/105474603322391596
(2009). Moving learning games forward: Obstacles, opportunities & openness. Cambridge, MA: MIT The Education Arcade. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/21w.789/www/papers/MovingLearningGamesForward_EdArcade.pdf
(2004).
Debiasing . In D. J. KoehlerN. HarveyEds., Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision-making (pp. 316–338). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.(2009). Being in the game: Avatar choice and point of view on psychophysiological responses during play. Media Psychology, 12, 348–370. doi: 10.1080/15213260903287242
(1980). What makes things fun to learn?: A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on small systems. (pp. 162–169). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=802839
(1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5, 333–369. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2
(2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Palgrave Press.
(1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
(2007).
Me, the other . In P. HarriganN. Wardrip-FruinEds., Second person, role-playing and story in games and playable media (pp. 297–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2004). ‘Live in your world, play in ours’: The spaces of video game identity. Journal of Visual Culture, 3, 223–238. doi: 10.1177/1470412904044801
(1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
(2009). Avatar identification: How similarity in appearance influences aggressive responses (Unpublished master’s thesis). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
(2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
(2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381. doi: 10.1177/0146167202286008
(2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14, 154–166. doi: 10.1037/a0019440
(2009). Overcoming cognitive bias in group decision-making
[White paper] . Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/PihMacho/raford-overcomingbias(2003).
Playing at being: Psychoanalysis and the avatar . In M. J. P. WolfB. PerronEds., The video game theory reader (pp. 103–127). New York, NY: Routledge.(1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44, 43–58.
Ritterfeld U.Cody M.Vorderer P.Eds.. (2009). Serious games: Mechanisms and effects. New York, NY: Routledge.
(2003). Rules of play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2002). Accessibility experiences and the hindsight bias: I knew it all along versus it could never have happened. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1288–1296.
(2014). Gaming at the edge: Gender and sexuality at the margins of gamer culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
(2008).
The influence of computers, interactive games, and the internet on a child’s multicultural worldview . In J. K. AsamenM. L. EllisG. L. BerryEds., The handbook of child development, multiculturalism, and media (pp. 333–348). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2010). Consider the situation: Reducing automatic stereotyping through Situational Attribution Training. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 221–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.004
(2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227–236.
(2010). Avatar creation and video game enjoyment: Effects of life-satisfaction, game competitiveness, and identification with the avatar. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22, 171–184. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000022
(1995). Life on the screen. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
(2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 506–519. doi: 10.1037/a0028857
(2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36, 285–312. doi: 10.1177/0093650208330254
