Skip to main content
Research Report

Investigating the Negation of Media Stereotypes

Ability and Motivation as Moderators

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000198

Abstract. We investigated the negation of media stereotypes. Negation refers to an internal attempt to negate stereotypic content (“No! This is not true!”). The process of negation is important because a critical assessment of stereotypic content can be beneficial for stereotype and prejudice reduction. This fact is a crucial reason why readers’ disagreement regarding simplified stereotypic depictions is of central interest for mass communication research and media literacy campaigns. Importantly, factors that can increase negation are of special interest. Although the ability and motivation to process stereotypic content can be theoretically identified as potential influencing factors, media-stereotype research has not yet tested the influence of these factors on negation. In Experiment 1 (N = 347), we manipulated the motivation to negate by presenting awareness material. We informed some of the participants that the news media often do not represent the world as it is, but sometimes do so in a stereotypic way. Analyses revealed that participants who received the awareness material before reading negated to a higher extent. In Experiment 2 (N = 223), we investigated the impact of ability by manipulating the time participants had to negate stereotypic content. The ability to negate was assumed to be higher the more time the participants had to process stereotypic information. As hypothesized, negation was higher when there was more time available. Interestingly, the increase in effect size was dampened the more time was available, which indicated a curvilinear relationship. Implications for media-literacy campaigns are discussed.

References

  • Arendt, F. (2010). Cultivation effects of a newspaper on reality estimates and explicit and implicit attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 147–159. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000020 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Arendt, F. (2013). Dose-dependent media priming effects of stereotypic newspaper articles on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Communication, 63, 830–851. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12056 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Arendt, F., Marquart, F. & Matthes, J. (2015). Effects of right-wing populist political advertising on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology, 27, 178–189. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000139 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Chartrand, T. & Bargh, J. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dixon, T. L. (2009). “He was a Black guy”: How news’ misrepresentation of crime creates fear of Blacks. In R. A. LindEd., Race/gender/media: Considering diversity across audiences, content, and producers (pp. 24–29). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B, Deutsch, R., Mbirkou, S., Seibt, B. & Strack, F. (2008). When “just say no” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gregg, A., Seibt, B. & Banaji, M. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harris, R. J. (2009). A cognitive psychology of mass communication. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hastie, R. & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J., Moll, J., Hermsen, S. & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871–888. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mastro, D. (2009). Effects of racial and ethnic stereotyping. In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 325–341). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, M. A. & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In R. E. PettyR. H. FazioP. BriñolEds., Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 19–63). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, K. & Gawronski, B. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 37, 557–569. doi: 10.1177/0146167211400423 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ramasubramanian, S. (2007). Media-based strategies to reduce racial stereotypes activated by news stories. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 249–264. doi: 10.1177/107769900708400204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. & Carpentier, F. D. (2009). Media priming. An updated synthesis. In J. BryantM. B. OliverEds., Media effects. Advances in theory and research (pp. 74–93). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar