Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

“Everyday I’m Çapuling”

Identity and Collective Action Through Social Network Sites in the Gezi Park Protests in Turkey

Published Online:October 04, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000202

Abstract

Abstract. This contribution examines the 2013 Gezi Park protests in Turkey by drawing on the social identity model of collective action (SIMCA) and the slacktivism versus facilitation debate in the literature on digitally enabled collective action. Contrary to the slacktivism hypothesis that claims online collective action to lack an apparent impact on the real world, the current study indicates a facilitating role of online collective action in the Gezi Park protests. By means of a large-scale online survey (N = 1,127) and a subsequent latent path analysis, the study demonstrates that the endurance of the movement was kept alive by both offline and online collective actions. The relationship between offline/online action and protest motivations was mediated by three predictors of collective action derived from the SIMCA: perceived injustice, social identity, and perceived efficacy. Results show that protestors in Turkey, independent of whether they became active in the digital or the real world, were likely to protest again to the extent that they perceived developments in Turkey as unjust, identified strongly with the Çapulcus [Turkish for looters] as a social group, and perceived this group to be efficient in changing social injustice in the country.

References

  • Acar, Y. G. & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2015). “Becoming us without being one”: A social psychological perspective on the Gezi Park protesters and negotiating levels of identity. In G. KocH. AksuEds., Another brick in the barricade: The Gezi resistance and its aftermath (pp. 34–54). Bremen, Germany: Wiener Verlag für Sozialforschung. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Acar, Y. G. & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2016). Examining prejudice reduction through solidarity and togetherness experiences among Gezi Park activists in Turkey. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1), 166–179. doi: 10.5964/jspp.v4i1.547 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alberici, A. I. & Milesi, P. (2013). The influence of the Internet on the psychosocial predictors of collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 373–388. doi: 10.1002/casp.2131 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Arıkan, G. & Şekercioğlu, E. (2014). Türkiye’de muhafazakârlaşma: Kuşak farkı var mı? [Rising conservatism in Turkey: Is there a generation gap?] Alternatif Politika, 6, 62–93. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C. & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the US. Political Communication, 25, 269–289. doi: 10.1080/10584600802197434 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bennett, W. L. & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brandstätter, H. & Opp, K. D. (2014). Personality traits (“Big Five”) and the propensity to political protest: Alternative models. Political Psychology, 35, 515–537. doi: 10.1111/pops.12043 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579–604. doi: 10.1348/014466600164642 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35–58. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.231 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N. & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harlow, S. & Guo, L. (2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 463–478. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12062 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hole, G. (2012). Experimental design. In G. M. BreakwellJ. A. SmithD. B. WrightEds., Research methods in psychology (4th ed., pp. 39–73). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Howard, P. N. (2010). The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political Islam. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jennings, M. K. & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 311–334. doi: 10.1086/376947 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2003). A boost or bust for democracy? How the Web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 9–34. doi: 10.1177/1081180X03008003002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karpf, D. (2010). Online political mobilization from the advocacy group’s perspective: Looking beyond clicktivism. Policy & Internet, 2, 7–41. doi: 10.2202/1944-2866.1098 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koc, I., Hancioglu, A. & Cavlin, A. (2008). Demographic differentials and demographic integration of Turkish and Kurdish populations in Turkey. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 447–457. doi: 10.1007/s11113-008-9072-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • KONDA. (2013). Gezi Parkı Profili [The Gezi Park profile]. Retrieved from http://www.genar.com.tr/files/GEZIPARKI_PROFIL-SON.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kristofferson, K., White, K. & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support impacts subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 1149–1165. doi: 10.1086/674137 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuzuloğlu, M. S. (2013). Gezi Parkı eylemlerinin sosyal medya karnesi. Radikal. Retrieved from http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/m-serdar-kuzuloglu/gezi-parki-eylemlerinin-sosyal-medya-karnesi-1138146/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K. M. (2006). Effects of Internet use on college students’ political efficacy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9, 415–422. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.415 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, Y.-H. & Hsieh, G. (2013). Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In M. BergerT. AbelC. H. PageEds., Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 811–820). New York, NY: ACM. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGarty, C., Lala, G. & Douglas, K. (2010). Opinion-based groups: (Racist) talk and (collective) action on the Internet. In Z. BirchmeierB. Deitz-UhlerG. StasserEds., Strategic uses of social technology: An interactive perspective of social psychology (pp. 145–171). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Smith, L. G. & Bliuc, A. M. (2014). New technologies, new identities, and the growth of mass opposition in the Arab spring. Political Psychology, 35, 725–740. doi: 10.1111/pops.12060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Morozov, E. (2009, May 19). The brave new world of slacktivism [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104302141 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Opp, K. D. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Opp, K. D. (2012). Collective identity, rationality and collective political action. Rationality and Society, 24, 73–105. doi: 10.1177/1043463111434697 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Opp, K. D. & Brandstätter, H. (2010). Political protest and personality traits: A neglected link. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 15, 323–346. doi: 10.17813/maiq.15.3.p73861l1625021u1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reicher, S. D. (1996). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the context of social psychology. In P. RobinsonEd., Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 317–337). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reicher, S. D. (2001). Crowds and social movements. In M. HoggS. TindaleEds., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182–208). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rothmund, T., Gollwitzer, M., Baumert, A. & Schmitt, M. (2012). The psychological functions of justice in mass media. In R. TamboriniEd., Media and the moral mind (pp. 170–197). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schumann, S. (2015). How the Internet shapes collective actions. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Segerberg, A. & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197–215. doi: 10.1080/10714421.2011.597250 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Solak, N. (2015). The role of emotions and emotion regulation in the system justification process (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Soon, C. & Kluver, R. (2014). Uniting political bloggers in diversity: Collective identity and web activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 500–515. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12079 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stürmer, S. & Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263–277. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256690 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tufekci, Z. & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tzelgov, J. & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524–536. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.524 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Uluğ, Ö. M. & Acar, Y. (2015). ‘We are more than alliances between groups’: A social psychological perspective on the Gezi Park protesters and negotiating levels of identity. In I. DavidK. F. ToktamışEds., ‘Everywhere Taksim’: Sowing the seeds for a new Turkey at Gezi (pp. 77–89). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Laer, J. & van Aelst, P. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13, 1146–1171. doi: 10.1080/13691181003628307 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W. & Spears, R. (2010). Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1055–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vissers, S., Hooghe, M., Stolle, D. & Mahéo, V.-A. (2012). The impact of mobilization media on off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects medium-specific? Social Science Computer Review, 30, 152–169. doi: 10.1177/0894439310396485 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T. & Bichard, S. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networks on political attitudes and behaviors. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 75–92. doi: 10.1177/0894439309335162 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar