Abstract
This research examined the influence of directional reading/writing habits on the representation of depth in a scene. Participants with English vs. Arabic language backgrounds were asked to represent an imagined scene containing two houses, a “near house” and a “far house.” Nearly all participants drew the near house larger than the far house and drew the near house before drawing the far house. However, significant group differences in spatial strategies and movement biases were noted. Whereas the majority of native English readers drew the near house on the left side of the page and the far house to the right of it, native Arabic readers showed a slight right bias in placement of the near house and tended to place the far house to the left of the near house. This effect of script direction characterized right-handed and left-handed users of each group. Taken together, the findings support a cultural account of asymmetries in representational drawing reflecting biases arising from prolonged experience in reading and writing in a particular direction.
References
1991). Cultural influences on visual scanning patterns. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 22, 525–534.
(1958). Nearness as a function of lateral orientation in pictures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 135–141.
(1989). A cerebial origin for “directionality”. Neuropsychologia, 27, 563–573.
(2006). Orthographic directionality and thematic role illustration in English and Arabic. Brain and Language, 97, 306–316.
(2008). Is it what you see, or how you say it? Spatial bias in young and aged subjects. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14, 562–570.
(1993). Representation of depth by children: Spatial strategies and lateral biases. Developmental Psychology, 29, 466–479.
(2002). The role of handedness in graphic production: Interactions between biomechanical and cognitive factors in drawing development. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 581–599.
(1948). The accuracy of positioning reactions as a function of their direction and extent. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 167–182.
(2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 351–367.
(2005). Writing direction influences spatial cognition. In , Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412–417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1995). Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation. Neuropsychologia, 33, 643–648.
(2002). On the origin of free-viewing perceptual asymmetries. Cortex, 38, 109–112.
(1995). Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(1), 51–58.
(2000). Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(1–2), 45–49.
(2007). How writing systems and age influence spatial representations of actions. Psychological Science, 18, 487–491.
(1974). Directionality trends as a function of handedness and of reading and writing habits. American Journal of Psychology, 87, 247–253.
(2003). The effects of reading-writing direction on the asymmetry of space perception and directional tendencies: A comparison between French and Tunisian children. Laterality, 8, 39–52.
(2007). Mental time lines follow writing direction: Comparing English and Hebrew speakers. In , Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1007–1010). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
(1950). Right and left in pictures. The Art Quarterly, 13, 312–331.
(2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110.
(2010, September). Effect of language environment on the spatial action representation of phrases in bilingual-bidirectional readers. Poster presented at Neurobilingualism Conference, Donostia, Spain.
(2010). Interactions of space and language: Insights from the neglect syndrome. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62, 188–193.
(1970). Perceptual exploration in Israeli children. Child Development, 41, 1125–1131.
(1979). Impact of learning to read on directionality in perception: A further cross-cultural analysis. Human Development, 22, 406–415.
(1972). Perceptual exploration in Israeli children and Bedouin children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3, 345–352.
(1988). Asymmetries in processing horizontal and vertical dimensions. Memory and Cognition, 16, 377–382.
(1975). Directionality in copying: Memory, handedness and alignment effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 863–872.
(1976). Lateral dominance and aesthetic preference. Neuropsychologia, 14, 431–445.
(1975). Developmental trends in directionality in drawing in Jewish and Arab Israeli children. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 6, 504–511.
(2007). How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fist fight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior. Social Cognition, 25, 833–852.
(2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14, 296–301.
(2003). Descriptions of simple spatial scenes in English and Japanese. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 3–42.
(1981). Cross-cultural differences in directionality. International Journal of Psychology, 16, 199–211.
(1985). Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 161–174.
(1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
(2002). Directional scanning effect and strength of reading habit in picture naming and recall. Brain and Cognition, 48, 484–490.
(2010a). Handedness and script directionality in relation to graphic production, perception, and esthetic preference of visual stimuli. Undergraduate honors thesis, Texas A & M University.
(2010b). The “right way”. Explorations: Journal of Undergraduate Research, Texas A & M University, 2, 31–33.
(1979). Graphological patterns as a function of handedness and culture. Neuropsychologia, 17, 457–465.
(2000). Reading/writing vs. handedness influences on line length estimation. Brain and Cognition, 43, 398–402.
(1991). Cross cultural and developmental trends in graphic production. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.
(1998). Cultural versus biomechanical influences on a graphic production task. Brain and Cognition, 37, 75–78.
(2011). Asymmetries in representational drawing: Alternatives to a laterality account. In , Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 233–256). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2011, July). Script directionality affects spatial representation of scenes. Poster presented at International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Xi’an, China.
(2002). Stroke direction asymmetry in figure drawing: Influence of handedness and reading/writing habits. Brain and Cognition, 48, 597–602.
(1984). Drawing and cognition: Descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(