Skip to main content
Original Article

Because I’m Worth It! (More than Others ...)

Cooperation, Competition, and Ownership Bias in Group Decision-Making

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000109

In group decision-making, people take insufficient account of the information coming from others. We hypothesize that this can be explained by an ownership bias that would especially occur in competition, rather than in cooperation. In a two-phase decision-making situation, people reached an initial decision and then evaluated the value of their own information and the consistent and inconsistent information of others under different conditions of goal interdependence (cooperation or competition). Finally, then had to reach a final decision regarding a road accident. Results showed an ownership bias in information value which is stronger in competition than in cooperation. Moreover, decision quality was lower in competition than in cooperation, an effect mediated by the ownership bias, beyond the preference effect.

References

  • Alicke, M. D. , Klotz, M. L. , Breitenbecher, D. L. , Yurak, T. J. , Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation and the better than average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804–825. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchs, C. , Butera, F. , & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource in(ter)dependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24, 291–314. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, K. W. , & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A metaanalytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chernyshenko, O. S. , Miner, A. G. , Baumann, M. R. , Sniezek, J. A. (2003). The impact of information distribution, ownership, and discussion on group member judgment: The differential cue weighting model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 12–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Darnon, C. , Muller, D. , Schrager, S. , Pannuzzo, N. , Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766–776. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, J. H. , Laughlin, P. R. , Komorita, S. S. (1976). The social psychology of small groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 501–541. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Carnevale, P. J. D. (2003). Motivational bases for information processing and strategic choice in conflict and negotiation. In M. P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 235–291). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Conflict and creativity: Threat-rigidity or motivated focus? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648–661. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. , Nijstad, B. A. , van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Van Knippenberg, D. (2005). The possessive self as a barrier to constructive conflict management: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 345–357. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dickerson, S. S. , Gruenewald, T. L. , Kemeny, M. E. (2004). When the social self is threatened: Shame, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality, 72, 1192–1216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunning, D. , Meyerowitz, J. A. , Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082–1090. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faulmüller, N. , Kerschreiter, K. , Mojzisch, A. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 653–671. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41–80). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greitemeyer, T. , & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckhausen, J. , & Krueger, J. (1993). Developmental expectations for the self and most other people: Age-grading in three functions of social comparisons. Developmental Psychology, 29, 539–548. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206–219. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Creative controversy: Intellectual challenge in the classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Interaction Book Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. (1998). Enhancement bias in the description of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 505–516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. , Heckhausen, J. (1993). Personality development across the adult life span: Subjective conceptions versus cross-sectional contrasts. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 100–108. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Larson, J. R., Jr. , Foster-Fishman, P. G. , Keys, C. B. (1994). Information sharing in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446–461. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McFarland, C. , & Miller, D. T. (1990). Judgments of self-other similarity: Just like others only more so. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 475–484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mojzisch, A. , Grouneva, L. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Biased evaluation of information during discussion: Disentangling the effects of preference consistency, social validation, and ownership of information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 946–956. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muller, D. , Butera, F. (2004). On being concerned about bragging. Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 159–179. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. , & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roese, N. J. , Olson, J. M. (1994). Attitude importance as a function of repeated attitude expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 39–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, M. , Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sedikides, C. , Campbell, W. K. , Reeder, G. , Elliot, A. J. (1998). The self-serving bias in relational context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 378–386. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Toma, C. , Butera, F. (2009). Hidden profiles and concealed information. Strategic information sharing and use in group decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 793–806. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Toma, C. , Gilles, I. , & Butera, F. (in press). Strategic use of preference confirmation in group decision-making: The role of competition and dissent. British Journal of Social Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Swol, L. M. , Savadori, L. , Sniezek, J. A. (2003). Factors that may affect the difficulty of uncovering hidden profiles. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 285–304. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winquist, J. R. , & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371–377. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wittenbaum, G. M. , Hollingshead, A. B. , Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286–310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar