Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

Processing of Social Identity Threats

A Defense Motivation Perspective

Published Online:January 01, 2013https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000133

Abstract

The underlying process of reactions to social identity threat was examined from a defense motivation perspective. Two studies measured respondents’ social identification, after which they read threatening group information. Study 1 compared positive and negative group information, attributed to an ingroup or outgroup source. Study 2 compared negative and neutral group information to general negative information. It was expected that negative group information would induce defense motivation, which reveals itself in biased information processing and in turn affects the evaluation of the information. High identifiers should pay more attention to, have higher threat perceptions of, more defensive thoughts of, and more negative evaluations of negative group information than positive or neutral group information. Findings generally supported these predictions.

References

  • Aiken, L. S. , West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindsey, (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 680–740). New York, NY: Oxford University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Branscombe, N. , Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, B. Doosje, (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Branscombe, N. , & Wann, D. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–657. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, R. , Condor, S. , Matthews, A. , Wade, G. , Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cadinu, M. R. , & Cerchioni, M. (2001). Compensatory biases after ingroup threat: “Yeah, but we have a good personality.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 353–367. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chaiken, S. , Giner-Sorolla, R. , Chen, S. (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. M. Gollwitzer, J. A. Bargh, (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553–578). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chaiken, S. , Liberman, A. , Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh, (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, S. , Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken, Y. Trope, (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coull, A. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. , Castano, E. , Paladino, M. , Leemans, V. (2001). Protecting the ingroup: Motivated allocation of cognitive resources in the presence of threatening ingroup members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 327–339. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Hoog, N. , Stroebe, W. , de Wit, J. B. F. (2005). The impact of fear appeals on the processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 24–33. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dietz-Uhler, B. (1999). Defensive reactions to group-relevant information. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2(1), 17–29. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ditto, P. H. , Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617–626. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gaertner, L. , Sedikides, C. , Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5–18. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hewstone, M. , Rubin, M. , & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J. , & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365–383. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J. , Oppes, T. , & Svensson, A. (2002). “It’s OK if we say it, but you can’t”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293–307. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luhtanen, R. , Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 772–781. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Dwyer, A. , Berkowitz, N. H. , Alfeld-Johnson, D. (2002). Group and person attributions in response to criticism of the in-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 563–588. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preaches, K. J. , & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pyszczynski, T. , & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 297–340). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sherman, D. K. , & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183–242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp, (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. , Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, W. G. Austin, (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, M. S. Wetherell, (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 68–88). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar