Skip to main content
Original Article

Assessing Individual Differences in the Need for Interpersonal Touch and Need for Touch

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000157

The present study investigates individual differences in the automatic use of haptic information from interpersonal touch. We present a questionnaire assessing individual differences in the need for interpersonal touch (NFIPT), which was validated within an unrelated product-evaluation task. Before entering the laboratory, participants were briefly touched on the shoulder or received no touch. Assessing confidence and frustration within the following product-evaluation task, we examined moderating effects of NFIPT and additionally effects of need for touch (NFT). Results showed that higher NFIPT participants were more confident when they were briefly touched. Effects on frustration were only found for NFT. Results show that frustration was greater for individuals with higher NFT, when they could not touch the product during the evaluation task.

References

  • Baron, R. M. , Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burgoon, J. K. , Walther, J. B. , Baesler, E. J. (1992). Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19, 237–263. doi 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00301.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Citrin, A. V. , Stem, D. E. , Spangenberg, E. R. , Clark, M. J. (2003). Consumer need for tactile input. An internet retailing challenge. Journal of Business Research, 56, 915–922. doi 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00278-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collani, G. (2007a). Eine deutsche Skala zum Bedürfnis nach Bewertung (Need to Evaluate) [A German scale to the Need to Evaluate]. In A. Glöckner-Rist, (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente (Acceptance of documentation: ZIS 7.00, 2003). ZIS Version 11.00. Bonn: GESIS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Collani, G. (2007b). Eine deutsche Skala zum Konstrukt “Bedürfnis nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit (NFCC)/Persönliches Strukturbedürfnis (PNS)” [A German scale of the construct “Need for Cognitive Closure/Personal Need for Structure”]. In A. Glöckner-Rist, (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente (Acceptance of documentation: ZIS 7.00, 2003). ZIS Version 11.00. Bonn: GESIS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crusco, A. H. , & Wetzel, C. G. (1984). The Midas touch: The effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 512–517. doi 10.1177/ 0146167284104003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Erceau, D. , Guéguen, N. (2007). Tactile contact and evaluation of the toucher. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 441–444. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fornell, C. , Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi 10.2307/3151312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Field, T. (2002). Infants’ need for touch. Human Development, 45, 100–103. doi 10.1159/000048156 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fisher, J. D. , Rytting, M. , Heslin, R. (1976). Hands touching hands: Affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry, 39, 416–421. doi 10.2307/3033506 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Francis, S. , Rolls, E. T. , Bowtell, R. , McGlone, F. , O’Doherty, J. , Browning, A. , ... Smith, E. (1999). The representation of pleasant touch in the brain and its relationship with taste and olfactory areas. NeuroReport, 10, 453–459. doi 10.1097/00001756-199902250-00003 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gallace, A. , Spence, C. (2009). The cognitive and neural correlates of tactile memory. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 380–406. doi 10.1037/a0015325 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gallace, A. , Spence, C. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 246–259. doi 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. (2002a). Kinds of touch, gender, and compliance with a request. Studia Psychologica, 44, 167–172. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. (2002b). Touch, awareness of touch, and compliance with a request. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 355–360. doi 10.2466/pms.2002.95.2.355 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. (2007). Courtship compliance: The effect of touch on women’s behavior. Social Influence, 2, 81–97. doi 10.1080/ 15534510701316177 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. , Afifi, F. , Brault, S. , Charles-Sire, V. , Leforestier, P.-M. , Morzedec, A. , & Piron, E. (2011). Failure of tactile contact to increase request compliance: The case of blood donation behavior. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 8, 2–8. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. , & Fischer-Lokou, J. (2003a). Another evaluation of touch and helping behavior. Psychological Reports, 92, 62–64. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. , & Fischer-Lokou, J. (2003b). Tactile contact and spontaneous help: An evaluation in a natural setting. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 785–787. doi 10.1080/00224540309600431 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. , & Jacob, C. (2005). The effect of touch on tipping: An evaluation in a French bar. Hospitality Management, 24, 295–299. doi 10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. , Jacob, C. , & Boulbry, G. (2007). The effect of touch on compliance with a restaurant’s employee suggestion. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26, 1019–1023. doi 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.12.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haans, A. , IJsselsteijn, W. A. , Graus, M. P. , Salminen, J. A. (2008). The virtual Midas touch: Helping behavior after a mediated social touch. In Extended abstracts of CHI 2008 (pp. 3507–3512). New York: ACM Press. doi 10.1145/1358628.1358882 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hertenstein, M. J. , & Keltner, D. (2011). Gender and the communication of emotion via touch. Sex Roles, 64, 70–80. doi 10.1007/s11199-010-9842-y First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hertenstein, M. J. , Keltner, D. , App, B. , Bulleit, B. A. , & Jaskolka, A. R. (2006). Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion, 6, 528–533. doi 10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornik, J. (1987). The effect of touch and gaze upon compliance and interest of interviewees. The Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 681–683. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hornik, J. (1992a). Effects of physical contact on customers’ shopping time and behavior. Marketing Letters, 3, 49–55. doi 10.1007/BF00994080 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornik, J. (1992b). Tactile stimulation and consumer response. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 449–458. doi 10.1086/ 209314 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornik, J. , Ellis, S. (1988). Strategies to secure compliance for mall intercept interview. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 539–551. doi 10.1086/269129 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, W. B. G. , & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172–194. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, S. E. , Yarbrough, A. E. (1985). A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communication Monographs. Communication Monographs, 52, 19–56. doi 10.1080/03637758509376094 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joule, R.-V. , Guéguen, N. (2007). Touch, compliance, and awareness of tactile contact. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 581–588. doi 10.2466/pms.104.2.581-588 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klatzky, R. J. , & Lederman, S. J. (2003). Touch. In A. F. Healy, R. W. Proctor, (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 147–176). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kleinke, C. L. (1977). Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 218–223. doi 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90044-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, R. J. , Derlega, V. J. , Shankar, A. , Cochard, E. , & Finkel, L. (1997). Nonverbal correlates of confederates’ touch: Confounds in touch research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 821–830. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindgren, L. , Westling, G. , Brulin, C. , Lehtipalo, S. , Andersson, M. , Nyberg, L. (2012). Pleasant human touch is represented in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex. NeuroImage, 59, 3427–3432. doi 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lynn, M. , Le, J.-M. , & Sherwyn, D. (1998). Reach out and touch your customers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39, 60–65. doi 10.1177/001088049803900312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Montagu, A. (1986). Touching: The human significance of the skin (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moors, A. , De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nuszbaum, M. , Voss, A. , Klauer, C. K. , Betsch, T. (2010). Assessing individual differences in the use of haptic information using a German translation of the Need for Touch Scale. Social Psychology, 41, 263–274. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Patterson, M. L. , Powell, J. L. , Lenihan, M. G. (1986). Touch compliance and interpersonal affect. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 41–50. doi 10.1007/BF00987204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peck, J. , Childers, T. L. (2003a). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “Need for Touch” scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 430–442. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peck, J. , Childers, T. L. (2003b). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67, 35–48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peck, J. , Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59, 765–769. doi 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peck, J. , Wiggins, J. (2006). It just feels good: Customers’ affective response to touch and its influence on persuasion. Journal of Marketing, 70, 56–69. doi 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.56 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raven, J. , Raven, J. C. , Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 1: General overview. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reite, M. (1990). Touch, attachment, and health: Is there a relationship? In K. E. Barnard, T. B. Brazelton, (Eds.), Touch: The foundation of experience (pp. 195–228). Madison, WI: International Universities Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Remland, M. S. , & Jones, T. S. (1988). Cultural and sex differences in touch avoidance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 544–546. doi 10.2466/pms.1988.67.2.544 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rolls, E. T. , O’Doherty, J. , Kringelbach, M. L. , Francis, S. , Bowtell, R. , & McGlone, F. (2003). Representations of pleasant and painful touch in the human orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 308–317. doi 10.1093/cercor/13.3.308 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rose, S. A. (1990). The sense of touch. In K. E. Barnard, T. B. Brazelton, (Eds.), Touch: The foundation of experience (pp. 299–324). Madison, WI: International Universities Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2006). The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Psychologica, 121, 41–64. doi 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, D. E. , Gier, J. A. , Willis, F. N. (1982). Interpersonal touch and compliance with a marketing request. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 35–38. doi 10.1207/ s15324834basp0301_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stephen, R. , Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1986). The effect on tipping of a waitress touching male and female customers. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 141–142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Webster, D. M. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whitcher, S. J. , & Fisher, J. D. (1979). Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 87–96. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.87 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilhelm, F. H. , Kochar, A. S. , Roth, W. T. , Gross, J. J. (2001). Social anxiety and response to touch: Incongruence between self-evaluative and physiological reactions. Biological Psychology, 58, 181–202. doi 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00113-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, S. J. , & Willis, F. N. (1978). Interpersonal touch among preschool children at play. Psychological Record, 28, 501–508. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willis, F. N. , & Hamm, H. K. (1980). The use of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 49–55. doi 10.1007/BF00987054 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27. doi 10.1037/ h0025848 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar