Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000175

How do people know what interacting with others would be like? This research examines how subjective feelings of difficulty in imagination can influence judgments in the context of social interaction. Participants imagined behaviors of members of a group while difficulty of imagination was manipulated, and reported outlook of future interactions with them. Study 1 revealed that after imagining target group members’ reactions in situations that are inherently more difficult, participants had more negative outlook of future interaction with them. Perceived difficulty of imagination partly explained this effect. In Study 2, when incidentality of the association between the situations and the target group was made explicit, the outlook of future interaction with the targets was less negative. The findings extend research on metacognition to interpersonal context while offering several interesting contrasts with previous studies. Limitations and possible future directions are discussed.

References

  • Alden, L. E. , Wallace, S. T. (1995). Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful social interactions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 497–506. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alter, A. L. , Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340–353. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, R. M. , Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Briñol, P. , Petty, R. E. , Tormala, Z. L. (2006). The malleable meaning of subjective ease. Psychological Science, 17, 200–206. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crawford, M. T. , Sherman, S. J. , Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1076–1094. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duck, S. , Rutt, D. , Hurst, M. , & Strejc, H. (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships. Human Communication Research, 18, 228–267. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilbert, D. T. , Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gorn, G. J. , Goldberg, M. E. , Basu, K. (1993). Mood, awareness and product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 237–256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gudykunst, W. B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status. In R. L. Wiseman, (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 8–58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gudykunst, W. B. , Shapiro, R. B. (1996). Communication in everyday interpersonal and intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 19–45. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackmann, A. , Surawy, C. , Clark, D. M. (1998). Seeing yourself through others’ eyes: A study of spontaneously occurring images in social phobia. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26, 3–12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, D. L. , Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hebl, M. , Tickle, J. , & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. Hebl, J. G. Hull, (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 275–306). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hirsch, C. R. , Clark, D. M. (2004). Information-processing bias in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 799–825. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Islam, M. , & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived outgroup variability, and outgroup attitude: An integrative model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mandel, N. , Petrova, P. K. , Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 57–69. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muraven, M. , Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petrova, P. K. , Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Fluency of consumption imagery and the backfire effects of imagery appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 442–452. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pettigrew, T. F. , Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Plant, E. A. , Devine, P. G. (2003). Antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 790–801. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. , Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior, Research, Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. , Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raghunathan, R. , Pham, M. T. , Corfman, K. P. (2006). Informational properties of anxiety and sadness, and displaced coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 596–601. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rapee, R. M. , Lim, L. (1992). Discrepancy between self and observer ratings of performance in social phobics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 727–731. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reber, R. , & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338–342. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reber, R. , Winkielman, P. , Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richeson, J. A. , Trawalter, S. (2005). Why do intergroup interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 934–947. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubin, M. , Paolini, S. , Crisp, R. J. (2010). A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 21–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlenker, B. R. , Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. , Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgment of well-being. Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. , Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins, A. Kruglanski, (Eds.), Social psychology. A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed). (pp. 385–407). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, B. L. , Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1074–1083. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E. , Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siemer, M. , & Reisenzein, R. (1998). Effects of mood on evaluative judgements: Influence of reduced processing capacity and mood salience. Cognition & Emotion, 12, 783–805. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt, (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Song, H. , & Schwarz, N. (2008). If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stephan, W. G. , Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–176. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, S. , Rapee, R. M. (2002). The effect of situational structure on the social performance of socially anxious and non-anxious participants. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 91–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Topolinski, S. , Strack, F. (2009a). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39–63. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Topolinski, S. , Strack, F. (2009b). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1465–1503. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Towles-Schwen, T. , Fazio, R. H. (2003). Choosing social situations: The relation between automatically-activated racial attitudes and anticipated comfort interacting with African Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 170–182. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, R. N. , Crisp, R. J. , Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tversky, A. , Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Unkelbach, C. , Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In C. Unkelbach, R. Greifeneder, (Eds.), The experience of thinking (pp. 11–32). London, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dick, R. , Pettigrew, T. F. , Wolf, C. , Smith Castro, V. , Wagner, U. , Christ, O. , … Jackson, J. S. (2004). Role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211–227. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Voci, A. , & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice towards immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vorauer, J. D. , Hunter, A. J. , Main, K. J. , Roy, S. (2000). Meta-stereotype activation: Evidence from indirect measures for specific evaluative concerns experienced by members of dominant groups in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 690–707. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vorauer, J. D. , Main, K. J. , O’Connell, G. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 917–937. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • West, K. , & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Nice and easy does it: How perceptual fluency moderates the effectiveness of imagined contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 254–262. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winkielman, P. , Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation increases positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winkielman, P. , Schwarz, N. , Fazendeiro, T. , Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch, K. C. Klauer, (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar