How Dyads Reminiscence Moderates the Relations Between Familiarity, Trust, and Memory Conformity
Abstract
We examined memory conformity about an experience among dyads. Specifically, we tested the extent to which interpersonal familiarity and trust among dyads predicted their memory conformity to each other, and the extent to which the reminiscence mode (verbal discussion vs. nonverbal revision) moderated these relations. Participants (N = 100) in pairs (dyads = 50) either discussed verbally (discussion dyads = 25) or exchanged their written details nonverbally (revision dyads = 25) about a novel, shared experience in the laboratory. Discussing a new, shared event with a partner (vs. comparing each other’s written testimonies) predicted corrective memory conformity (personal memory improvement) and distortive memory conformity (personal memory errors). The data did not support an alternative model. Results thus suggest that familiarity and trust predict memory conformity, corrective and distortive, but only when people directly discuss their memories about an experience. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the two social psychological variables familiarity and trust in the context of memory conformity.
References
1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939
(1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–211. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350090303
(2009). Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1069–1076. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1069
(2009). The role of narratorship and expertise in social remembering. Social Psychology, 40, 119–129. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.119
(2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x
(2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33, 770–782. doi: 10.3758/BF03193073
(1991). Mixed messages: The multiple audience problem and strategic communication. Social Cognition, 9, 25–46. doi: 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.25
(2008). You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. Memory, 16, 262–273. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801491
(2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533–543. doi: 10.1002/acp.885
(2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215–227. doi: 10.1348/1355325041719428
(2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480–485. doi: 10.3758/BF03193873
(1994). Communication during prose recall conversations by young and old dyads. Discourse Processes, 17, 149–165. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544863
(1996). Shared reality: How social verification made the subjective objective. In R. M. SorentinoE. T. HigginsEds., Handbook of motiviation and cognition: Foundations of social behaviour, (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford.
(2011). We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48, 267–303. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2010.541854
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 55–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340
(2001). Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions. Memory & Cognition, 29, 394–404. doi: 10.3758/BF03196390
(2008). “With a little help from my friends”: The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica, 127, 476–484. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010
(2011). The adaptive nature of memory and its illusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 312–315. doi: 10.1177/0963721411416571
(2000). Do elderly couples have a better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121–133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<121::AID-ACP626>3.0.CO;2-A
(2005). Compensating strategies in collaborative remembering in very old couples. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 349–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00465.x
(1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306–1317. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1306
(2010). Shared-reality effects on memory: Communicating to fulfill epistemic needs. Social Cognition, 28, 353–378. doi: 10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.353
(1980). Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, 595–604. doi: 10.2307/351903
(2011). Local and global evaluations: Attitudes as self regulatory guides for near and distant responding. In K. D. VohsR. F. BaumeisterEds., Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application (2nd ed.). (pp. 226–243). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 995–1009. doi: 10.3758/BF03194318
(2002). Contexts, functions, forms, and processes of collaborative everyday problem solving in older adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 6–15. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000283
(1968). Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 26–30. doi: 10.1037/h0026384
(1999). Eyewitness testimony and the Oklahoma bombing. The Psychologist, 12, 292–295.
(2007). The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and retrospective eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 231–247. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9047-7
(2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083–1099. doi: 10.1002/acp.1261
(2003). The familiar stranger: Anxiety, comfort, and play in public places. Proc. SIG CHI Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 269–286). New York, NY: ACM Press.
(2006). Comparing two perceived characteristics of autobiographical memory: Perceptions of memory detail and perceptions of accessibility. Memory, 14, 471–485. doi: 10.1080/09658210500478434
(2001). The social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365–371. doi: 10.3758/BF03196174
(1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1467.1967.tb01454
(2004). Older adults’ strategic behavior: Effects of individual versus collaborative cognitive training. Educational Gerontology, 30, 587–610. doi: 10.1080/03601270490466985
(2004). Effects of post identification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334–346. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.334
(2007). Co-witness feedback in line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 489–497.
(2009). Susceptibility to post-identification feedback is affected by source credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 506–523. doi: 10.1002/acp.1470
(2004). The effects of social disclosure on the affective intensity provoked by autobiographical memories. Self and Identity, 3, 285–309. doi: 10.1080/13576500444000065
(1977). Relationships in marriage and family. New York, NY: Macmillan.
(1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading post-event information. Memory & Cognition, 14, 329–338. doi: 10.3758/BF03202511
(2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189–202. doi: 10.1348/000712600161781
(1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 934–945. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934
(