Seeing More Than Others
Identification of Subtle Aggressive Information as a Function of Trait Aggressiveness
Abstract
Abstract. Researchers have long argued that aggressive individuals automatically tend to perceive hostile intent in others, even when it is in fact absent (hostile attribution bias). Wilkowski and Robinson (2012) recently showed, however, that aggressive individuals were particularly accurate in the identification of subtle cues of facial anger, indicating greater perceptual sensitivity to anger information rather than a biased perception or interpretation. We tested the generality of this finding in four paradigms with different stimuli. As predicted by Wilkowski and Robinson, the more aggressive participants were, the more accurately they identified subtle aggressive information, whereas accuracy in the identification of nonaggressive emotional information was not a function of self-reported aggressiveness. The discussion focuses on the generality and limitations of the findings.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(2008). Creating your own hostile environment: A laboratory examination of trait aggressiveness and the violence escalation cycle. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 462–473.
(2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.
(2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322.
(1997). A longitudinal study of emotion recognition and preschool children’s social behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 107–128.
(2008). On the consideration of automatic as well as controlled psychological processes in aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 117–129.
(2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751–777.
(2012). The affect misattribution procedure: Hot or not? Emotion, 12, 403–412.
(2015). Automatic processes in aggression: Conceptual and assessment issues. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 44–50.
(1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452.
(1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.
(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349.
(2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.
(1980). Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162–170.
(2006). Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 791–814.
(2009). Examining the validity of the modified Taylor competitive reaction time test of aggression. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 121–135.
(2001). Is mood congruency an effect of genuine memory or response bias? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 210–214.
(2014).
Implicit measures in social and personality psychology . In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.(2004). A signal-detection analysis of sex differences in the perception of emotional faces. Brain and Cognition, 54, 248–250.
(2006). Self-reported aggression and the perception of anger in facial expression photos. Journal of Psychology, 140, 255–267.
(1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.
(2013).
Gender differences in nonverbal communication . In J. A. HallM. L. KnappEds., Nonverbal communication (pp. 639–669). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.(1998). FAF – Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Aggressivitätsfaktoren. Handanweisung
[FAF – Questionnaire for the assessment of aggression factors. Manual] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.(2003). Faktorstruktur, Gütekriterien und Konstruktvalidität der deutschen Übersetzung des Aggressionsfragebogens von Buss und Perry
[Factor structure, psychometric criteria, and construct validity of the German translation of the aggression questionnaire of Buss and Perry] . Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 311–323.(2008). Kurzfragebogen zur Erfassung von Aggressivitätsfaktoren (K-FAF)
[Short questionnaire for the assessment of aggression factors] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.(2010). Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta Psychologica, 135, 278–283.
(1998).
The role of social information processing and cognitive schemas in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior . In R. G. GeenE. DonnersteinEds., Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for policy (pp. 73–109). New York, NY: Academic Press.(2011). An inkblot for sexual preference: A semantic variant of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 676–690.
. (2008). Inquisit 2.0.61004.7 [Computer software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
(2004). The conditional reasoning measurement system for aggression: An overview. Human Performance, 17, 271–295.
(2006). Violent media consumption and the recognition of dynamic facial expressions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 571–584.
(2008). Personality-linked biases in perception of emotional facial expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1093–1104.
(2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377–1388.
(2002). Cynical hostility and the accuracy of decoding facial expressions of emotions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 285–292.
(1969). Skalen zur Messung manifester Angst (MAS) und sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM)
[Scales for the assessment of anxiety and social desirability] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.(1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces – KDEF. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet.
(1998, June). The AR Face Database. CVC Technical Report #24.
(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
(2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934.
(2013). Increasing recognition of happiness in ambiguous facial expressions reduces anger and aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 24, 688–697.
(2010).
Prediction of behavior . In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 255–277). New York, NY: Guilford Press.(2008). Mechanisms linking early experience and the emergence of emotions: Illustrations from the study of maltreated children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 370–375.
(2002). Effects of early experience on children’s recognition of facial displays of emotion. Developmental Psychology, 38, 784–791.
(2008). Automatic processes and individual differences in aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 423–430.
(2005). Hot sauce, toy guns, and graffiti: A critical account of current laboratory aggression paradigms. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 407–419.
(2013). Feind oder Freund? Zum Zusammenhang von Emotionserkennung und Aggressivität
[Friend or enemy? On the relation between emotion recognition and aggressiveness] . Unpublished bachelor thesis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.(2014). Blinded by rage? An investigation of the hostility bias towards ambiguous facial cues in antisocial violent offenders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 264, 61–96.
(1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität
[The social-desirability-scale-17 (SES-17). Development and first results on reliability and validity] . Diagnostica, 45, 173–177.(1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450.
(1996). Limitations of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 163–177.
(2002). Automatic sources of aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 53–68.
(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Weasley.
(2009). Motivated perception in the mood of the crowd task. Talk given at the colloquium of the department of social psychology and methodology, Institute for Psychology, University of Freiburg.
(2007). How to make your own response boxes: A step-by-step guide for the construction of reliable and inexpensive parallel-port response pads from computer mice. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 797–801.
(2008). The cognitive basis of trait anger and reactive aggression: An integrative analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 3–21.
(2010). The anatomy of anger: An integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression. Journal of Personality, 78, 9–38.
(2012). When aggressive individuals see the world more accurately: The case of perceptual sensitivity to subtle facial expressions of anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 540–553.
