Skip to main content
Original Article

Life Satisfaction and Value Congruence

Moderators and Extension to Constructed Socio-Demographic Groups in a Russian National Sample

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000268

Abstract. Congruence between own and reference group values promotes life satisfaction. Does this effect extend to value congruence with others with whom one does not interact but who share socio-demographic characteristics? We constructed 36 socio-demographic categories in a representative Russian national sample (N = 961). Correlations of individuals’ values with the mean value of their category indexed value congruence. Both a meta-analysis across the constructed groups and an individual level regression analysis confirmed a positive value congruence – life satisfaction effect. This effect held even when controlling for age, gender, education, religiosity, region, religion, and the 19 values on which the congruence score was based. Self-direction-action values moderated the effect: it was stronger the less important independence of action was to individuals.

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1–70. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Assouline, M. & Meir, E. I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 319–332. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E. & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. WyerT. K. SrullEds., Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A. (2006). Agenda 2006: What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 147–168. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, P. N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W. & Matz, D. C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1295–1310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, A. E. & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120, 573–594. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1969). Profile similarity coefficient invariant over variable reflection. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 281–284. doi: 10.1037/h0026865 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K. & Ethier, K. A. (1995). Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 280–291. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. & Clifton, D. (2002). Life satisfaction and religiosity in broad probability samples. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 206–209. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Diener, E. & Fujita, F. (2013). Social comparisons and subjective well-being. In B. P. BuunkF. X. GibbonsA. BuunkEds., Health, coping and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory (pp. 329–358). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dyrenforth, P. S., Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B. & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, J. R. & Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 85–129. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frijters, P. & Beatton, T. (2012). The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82, 525–542. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P. & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification. The American Economic Review, 94, 730–740. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greer, T. (2007). Minority-related stressors and coping processes among African American college students. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 388–404. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modeling, 20, 331–360. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henson, J. M., Derlega, V. J., Pearson, M. R., Ferrer, R. & Holmes, K. (2013). African-American students’ responses to racial discrimination: How race-based rejection sensitivity and social constraints are related to psychological reactions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32, 504–529. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Higgins, J. P. T. & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lubbers, M. J., Kuyper, H. & Van Der Werf, M. P. C. (2009). Social comparison with friends versus non-friends. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 52–68. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luo, S. & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304–326. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. I. & Crandall, C. S. (2015). Social norms and social influence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 147–151. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Musiol, A.-L. & Boehnke, K. (2013). Person-environment value congruence and satisfaction with life. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3, 57–65. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 92–913. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oarga, C., Stavrova, O. & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). When and why is helping others good for well-being? The role of belief in reciprocity and conformity to society’s expectations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 242–255. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pérez-Asenjo, E. (2011). If happiness is relative, against whom do we compare ourselves? Implications for labour supply. Journal of Population Economics, 24, 1411–1442. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Realo, A. & Dobewall, H. (2011). Does life satisfaction change with age? A comparison of Estonia, Finland, Latvia, and Sweden. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 297–308. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roccas, S., Horenczyk, G. & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Acculturation discrepancies and well-being: The moderating role of conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 323–334. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sagiv, L. & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruence effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V. & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. ZannaEd., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 42, 249–288. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. & Butenko, T. (2014). Values and behavior: Validating the refined value theory in Russia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 799–813. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 1010–1028. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 171–185. doi: 10.1037/a0015546 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sortheix, F. M. & Lonnqvist, J.-E. (2015). Person-group value congruence and subjective well-being in students from Argentina, Bulgaria and Finland: The role of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 34–48. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O. & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). Single parents, unhappy parents? Parenthood, partnership, and the cultural normative context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 134–149. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., Schlosser, T. & Fetchenhauer, D. (2011). Are the unemployed equally unhappy all around the world? The role of the social norms to work and welfare state provision in 28 OECD countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 159–171. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tesch-Romer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A. & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85, 329–349. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Praag, B. (2011). Well-being, inequality and reference groups: An agenda for new research. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 111–127. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A. & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar