Dispositional Need to Belong Moderates the Impact of Negative Social Cues and Rejection on Self-Esteem
Abstract
Abstract. In two studies, we examined how need to belong as a dispositional variable influences the relational interpretation of social cues and the subsequent effect on self-esteem. Across both studies, the results from a negative (vs. positive) social cue condition showed that individuals high in need to belong were more negatively affected by (i.e., lower self-esteem, social involvement, and relational value) than those low in need to belong. Results from Study 2 also showed that these negative effects can be attenuated when participants have the opportunity to engage in self-affirmation. In all, the findings contribute to the literature by demonstrating that need to belong at the trait level not only has cognitive effects, but also has important downstream relational effects that influence how people differentially interpret the cues in their social environment.
References
(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
(1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289–304.
(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
(2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14–28.
(2003).
Nonverbal communication skills . In J. O. GreenB. R. BurlesonEds., Handbook of communication & social interaction skills (p. 184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.(1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193–214).
(1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 19–41.
(2002).
Nonverbal signals . In M. L. KnappJ. DalyEds., Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 240–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(1984). The relevance of the microstructure of interaction to relationship change. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 239–264.
(1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 89–114.
(2001). Emotion, attention and the “negativity bias”, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal Psychophysiology, 41, 75–85.
(2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310.
(1987). The nature of conversational involvement and nonverbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13, 463–494.
(2008). Why does writing about important values reduce defensiveness? Self-affirmation and the role of positive, other-directed feelings. Psychological Science, 19, 740–747.
(2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741.
(2010). An Update of the Empirical Case for the Need to Belong. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 66, 93–115.
(1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910.
(1984). Choices, values, and frames. The American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
(2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730.
(1997). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
(2001).
The self we know and the self we show: Self-esteem, self-presentation, and the maintenance of interpersonal relationships . In G. J. O. FletcherM. ClarkEds., Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 457–477). Malden, MA: Blackwell.(2001). Deconfounding the effects of dominance and social acceptance on self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 898–909.
(2012). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.
(2014). Helping the self help others: Self-affirmation increases feelings of self-compassion and pro-social behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 421.
(1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
(2006). Experimental manipulations of self-affirmation: A systematic review. Self and Identity, 5, 289–354.
(2005).
The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues as an adaptive response to social exclusion . In K. D. WilliamsJ. P. ForgasW. Von HippelEds., The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). New York, NY: Psychology Press.(2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107.
(2011).
Empathic accuracy and inaccuracy . In L. M. HorowitzS. StrackEds., Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 146). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.(2011). Re-writing the self-fulfilling prophecy of social rejection: Self-affirmation improves relational security and social behavior up to two months later. Psychological Science, 22, 1145–1149).
(2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.
(2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on ostracism and interpersonal acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 38, 174–180.
(1998). The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 117–141.
