Abstract
Abstract. This research extends the better-than-average (BTA) effect commonly observed in judgments of abilities and personality traits to the domain of attitudes. Participants reported their attitudes toward 18 sociopolitical issues and estimated the attitudes of most other people toward these issues. Consistent with the research on pro-norm and anti-norm deviance, for issues high (vs. low) in the injunctive norm, participants perceived their attitudes to be more supportive (vs. deprecatory) than the attitudes of the majority. This effect was stronger for issues that participants judged to be personally important as well as when participants estimated others’ attitudes before indicating their own attitudes.
References
2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 163–182. doi: 10.1177/1368430202005002922
(2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906–912. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906
(1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630.
(2005).
(The better-than-average effect . In M. D. AlickeD. A. DunningJ. I. KruegerEds., The Self in social judgment (pp. 85–108). New York, NY: Tailor & Francis Group.1951).
(Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment . In H. GuetzkowEd., Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001
(1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376. doi: 10.1521/soco.1986.4.4.353
(2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 209–219. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432763
(2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813
(2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–622.
(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.
(1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082–1090. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082
(2002).
(Frequency judgment and retrieval structures: Splitting, zooming, and merging the units of the empirical world . In P. SedlmeierT. BetschEds., Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 67–87). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.2014). Regressive judgment: Implications of a universal property of the empirical world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 361–367. doi: 10.1177/0963721414546330
(2009). On splitting and merging categories: A regression account of subadditivity. Memory & Cognition, 37, 383–393. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.383
(2008). Unrealistic optimism and event threat. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 193–201. doi: 10.1080/13548500701426745
(2015). Self-enhancement diminished. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1003–1020. doi: 10.1037/xge0000105
(1993). Social comparison of health risks: Locus of control, the person-positivity bias, and unrealistic optimism1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 291–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01088.x
(2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248–264. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2
(2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69. doi: 10.1037/a0028347
(1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221–232. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.221
(1984). Thinking one’s abilities are unique and one’s opinions are common. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 203–208. doi: 10.1177/0146167284102005
(2009). Expressing deviant opinions: Believing you are in the majority helps. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 740–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.008
(2014). The limits of direct replications and the virtues of stimulus sampling. Social Psychology, 45, 299–300.
(2008). Distinguishing between silent and vocal minorities: Not all deviants feel marginal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 871–882. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.871
(2010). Nonconformity defines the self: The role of minority opinion status in self-concept clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 297–308. doi: 10.1177/0146167209358075
(1996). Context effects in the measurement of comparative optimism in probability judgments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 80–101. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.80
(1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243
(1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x
(2016). BTA effect in attitudes (Germany). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. 2016-03-14. doi: 10.3886/E64441V1
(2002). When different becomes similar: Compensatory conformity in bicultural visible minorities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1131–1142.
(1970). Personality, involvement and extremity of judgement. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9, 108–121. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1970.tb00650.x
(1995). Asking comparative questions: The impact of the direction of comparison. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 347–372. doi: 10.1086/269481
(1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181–1193. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1181
(