Democratic and Authoritarian Government Preferences in Times of Crisis
An Experimental Investigation
Abstract
Abstract: Prior studies have linked societal threats to a surge in conservative attitudes. We conducted three studies (N = 1,021) to investigate whether hypothetical threat situations impact peoples’ attitudes toward democracy or alternative systems. Study 1 shows that individuals under threat devaluate representative and participatory government types and show relatively stronger endorsement of less democratic alternatives. Study 2 clarifies that extranational threats elicit a greater shift toward nondemocratic ‘solutions’ than intranational threats and that citizens generally find a just process less important in times of crisis. Study 3 shows that the effect of threat on support for technocracy can be explained by heightened anticipated anxiety. We find no evidence that anticipated emotions consistently account for the observed shifts in government preferences under threat.
References
(2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
(2021). Humanity's Attitudes about democracy and political leaders: Patterns and trends. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(4), 957–986. 10.1093/poq/nfab056
(2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the me or the we? International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 35–49. 10.1080/00207594.2012.695075
(2022). Economic decline, social identity, and authoritarian values in the United States. International Studies Quarterly, 5(1), 1–14. 10.1093/isq/sqab027
(2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. 10.1353/jod.2016.0012
(2017). Technocratic attitudes: A citizens’ perspective of expert decision-making. West European Politics, 40(2), 430–458. 10.1080/01402382.2016.1242046
(2018). De-democratization in Hungary: Diffusely defective democracy. Democratization, 25(8), 1481–1499. 10.1080/13510347.2018.1485015
(2022). Boix–Miller–Rosato dichotomous coding of democracy, 1800–2020. Harvard Dataverse, 10.7910/DVN/FENWWR
(2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 311–323. 10.1207/s15324834basp2804_4
(2013). Death goes to the polls: A meta‐analysis of mortality salience effects on political attitudes. Political Psychology, 34(2), 183–200. 10.1111/pops.12005
(2006). Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 259–265. 10.1002/ejsp.294
(2021). Pandemic backsliding: Violations of democratic standards during Covid-19. Social Science and Medicine, 285, Article
114244 . 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114244(2021). Revenge of the experts: Will COVID-19 renew or diminish public trust in science? Journal of Public Economics, 193, Article
104343 . 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104343(2023). Leaving democracy? Pandemic threat, emotional accounts and regime support in comparative perspective. West European Politics, 46(3), 477–499. 10.1080/01402382.2022.2097409
(2019). Reimagining democracy: Lessons in deliberative democracy from the Irish front line. Cornell Selects.
(1990). Technocracy and the politics of Expertise. SAGE Publications.
(2018). Direct democracy in Switzerland. Routledge.
(2011). Collective reactions to threat: Implications for intergroup conflict and for solving societal crises. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5(1), 101–136. 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01027.x
(2014). Military rule. Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 147–162.
(2023). Towards a multifaceted measure of perceived legitimacy of participatory governance. Governance.
(2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
(2012). Public participation, procedural Fairness, and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 815–840. 10.1093/jopart/mur064
(2003). Anatomy of a rally effect: George W. Bush and the war on terrorism. Political Science and Politics, 36(1), 37–42. 10.1017/S1049096503001665
(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
(2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007. 10.1177/0146167207301028
(2017). “Rally Around the flag” effect. How and why support of the authorities grows during international conflicts and tragedies? Polis. Political Studies, 1(1), 136–146. 10.17976/jpps/2017.01.12
(2017). Can democracy be deliberative & participatory? The democratic case for political uses of mini-publics. Daedalus, 146(3), 85–105. 10.1162/DAED_a_00449
(2021). Simulation-based power analysis for factorial analysis of variance designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), Article
251524592095150 . doi:10.1177/2515245920951503(2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1083–1101. 10.1111/pops.12403
(2020). Pandemic backsliding: Does Covid-19 put democracy at risk? V-Dem Institute Policy Brief.
(2017). Measuring emotional response: Comparing alternative approaches to measurement. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(4), 733–754. 10.1017/psrm.2015.65
(2022). Does process matter? Experimental evidence on the effect of procedural fairness on citizens’ evaluations of policy outcomes. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 103–117. 10.1177/0192512120908874
(1963). Threat, attraction to group, and need for strong leadership: A laboratory experiment in a natural setting. Human Relations, 16(4), 317–334.
(2013). Pathogens and politics: Further evidence that parasite prevalence predicts authoritarianism. PLoS ONE, 8(5), Article
62275 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0062275(2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 901–907. 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.013
(2013). Internal and external threat in relationship with right‐wing attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 233–248. 10.1111/jopy.12011
(2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. 10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
(2023). Fear of terrorism and support for non-democratic rule in democracies. International Interactions, 49(4), 587–611. 10.1080/03050629.2023.2208726
. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
(2015). Terrorism risk and democratic preferences in Pakistan. PSN: Public Opinion/Support (Topic).
(2020). A democratic emergency after a health emergency? Exposure to COVID‐19, perceived economic threat and support for anti‐democratic political systems. Social Science Quarterly, 101(6), 2193–2202.
(2008). Why some hate to dilly-dally and others do not: The arousal-invoking capacity of decision-making for low-and high-scoring need for closure individuals. Social Cognition, 26(3), 333–346. 10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.333
(2013). Comparing the performance of autocracies: Issues in measuring types of autocratic regimes and performance. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 35–54. 10.1080/13569775.2013.773201
(1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. 10.1037/h0077714
(2020). Facing natural disasters through the endorsement of authoritarian attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, Article
101412 . 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101412(2019). Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727–740. 10.1111/padm.12615
(2013). The dimensional structure of people's fears, threats, and concerns and their relationship with right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 6–17. 10.1080/00207594.2012.696651
(2013). ‘Direct democracy now!’: The Greek indignados and the present cycle of struggles. Current Sociology, 61(4), 443–456. 10.1177/0011392113479744
(2018). Authoritarian neoliberalism and democratic backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the narratives of progress. South European Society and Politics, 23(2), 197–217. 10.1080/13608746.2018.1479945
(2024, January 15). Democratic and authoritarian government preferences in times of crisis: An experimental investigation [Data, Materials]. https://osf.io/823vx
(2003). Democracy versus efficiency? Comparing local government reforms across Europe. In N. KerstingA. Vetter (Eds.), Reforming local government in Europe: closing the gap between democracy and efficiency (pp. 11–28). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11258-7_1
(2020, July 23). Many across the globe are dissatisfied with how democracy is working. Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/04/29/many-across-the-globe-are-dissatisfied-with-how-democracy-is-working/
