Alterations in Movement Dynamics in a Tool-Use Task
The Role of Action-Relevant Inertial Tool Properties
Abstract
This research evaluated how the inertial properties of a tool influence tool-using actions. Grip patterns and movements of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children and adults were recorded while hammering. Results revealed that both number of pegs driven and movement amplitude increased developmentally and changed as a function of inertial properties of the tool but other aspects of motor control (i.e., period, grip position) did not. This suggests that both children and adults were able to discriminate and modulate only those parameters that had the largest impact on performance (i.e., the delivery of force with the hammer). Even though the ability to adjust tool movements as tool characteristics change is evident during preschool years, the ability to do so did not reach adult levels and appears to continue to develop beyond preschool.
References
(2002). Development of the infant’s ability to retrieve food through a slit. Infant and Child Development, 11, 43–56.
(1997). Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 62, I–VI–1–158.
(2008). What is the shape of developmental change? Psychological Review, 115, 527–543.
(2004). Variations of tool and task characteristics reveal that tool use postures are anticipated. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 303–315.
(2003). Geometrics and dynamics of a rod determine how it is used for reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 4–22.
(2004). Geometric, but not kinetic, properties of tools affect the affordances perceived by toddlers. Ecological Psychology, 16, 129–158.
(2010). The role of expertise in tool use: Skill differences in functional action adaptations to task constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 825–839.
(2009). Mutuality in the perception of affordances and the control of movement. In , Progress in motor control: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 271–289). New York, NY: Springer.
(1989). The emergence of a tool-using skill in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 894–912.
(1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the “muscular sense”. Neuroscience, 60, 551–568.
(2010). Dynamic touch perception in preschool children. Ecological Psychology, 22, 89–118.
(1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
(2002). Perceiving heaviness by dynamic touch: An investigation of the size-weight illusion in preschoolers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 171–183.
(2007). Using vision and dynamic touch to perceive the affordances of tools. Perception, 36, 750–772.
(2001). Somatosensory attunement to the rigid body laws. Experimental Brain Research, 136, 133–137.
(1997). Spoon handling in two-to-four year old children. Ecological Psychology, 9, 113–129.
(1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 35–48.
(2001). Affordances and inertial constraints on tool use. Ecological Psychology, 13, 173–195.
(2003). Haptically creating affordances: The user-tool interface. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 175–186.
(2004). Chosen-striking location and the user-tool-environment system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 267–280.
